history supreme yacht youtube

Find anything, super fast.

• Destinations
• Documentaries

History Supreme: The £3 Billion Gold Plated Yacht

By Ben Roberts

Intriguing reports have emerged regarding the world’s most expensive superyacht today. Worth almost ten times more than Eclipse, the largest yacht in the world, the 30.48m Gold plated superyacht, History Supreme, has now apparently hit the water.

History Supreme has been a well kept secret in the Superyacht Industry, which is understandable as the yacht itself is reportedly worth over £3 billion. Containing around 100,000kg of gold and platinum, History Supreme was designed by Stuart Hughes, the world renowned luxury designer, and took just over three years to complete.

Her hull and exterior design are both wrapped in the most sought after precious metals on the planet, coating elements of the deck, dining area, rails and even the anchor.

History Supreme also holds one of the most unique interior features to ever grace a yacht; a wall feature which is made from meteor stone and Tyrannosaurus Rex bone.

However, we feel it is highly unlikely that a superyacht adorned to this level will ever actually grace the waters, and if the reports are in fact true, it would be far better suited to a museum exhibit than a life on the ocean.

Related News

Featured events.

The Midas Touch: $4.8 Billion History Supreme Most Expensive Yacht Ever Sold

We’ve seen some opulent yachts, but the 100-foot History Supreme takes the gold-encrusted cake. Stuart Hughes, a British purveyor of luxury gadgets, took a break from his role as an iPad alchemist to create the $4.8 billion superyacht, covered in platinum and gold from bow to stern.

Purchased by an anonymous Malaysian businessman, History Supreme is the most expensive yacht ever sold, according to Luxury Launches. The Daily Mail reports that the impressive vessel took three years to complete and used over a staggering 220,462 pounds of precious metals. Everything – from the base of the boat, to the deck, dining area, rails and anchor – were decked out in gold and platinum.

The exorbitant price tag is also the result of the lavish master bedroom, adorned in platinum with a wall feature that is made from meteoric stone and a genuine T-Rex dinosaur bone. It is rumored that Robert Kuok purchased the superyacht, worth 10 times the amount Roman Abramovitch (previous title holder for world’s most expensive yacht) paid for the Eclipse megayacht. Kuok is one of only three Malaysians with a net worth of $5 billion or more, according to Forbes billionaire’s list . If the purchase price is accurate, “the most likely buyer is Robert Kuok , the richest man in Malaysia, with a net worth of $12.5 billion,” reports Business Insider .

We may not have any gold-fringed yachts for sale , but Atlantic Yacht & Ship features a wide variety of yachts and boats for sale that will suit even the most distinguishing tastes. Check our listings and contact a sales rep today to tour any vessel at 1-888-230-0439.

Categories for this Article

• luxury yachts

Explore Articles by Category

• 42Yellowfin
• AY&S News
• Bertram Yachts
• Boat Inventory
• center consoles for sale
• Custom Motor Yacht
• Florida Motor Yachts
• Florida Sport Fishing
• Fort Lauderdale News
• Fort Lauderdale Yachts
• Leopard Yacht
• Luxury Yacht Charter
• Maritime Industry
• Miami Yacht Show
• Motor Yacht Detailing & Maintenance
• Motor Yacht for Sale
• Navigator Yacht
• Palm Beach Yacht
• Pearl Yacht
• Pre Owned Motor Yachts
• Quality Motor Yachts
• Sabre Yacht
• Sport Fishers
• sportfish for sale
• Tri Deck Motor Yacht
• Uncategorized
• Viking sport fish
• World Travel
• Yacht Shows
• Yachting News

Find anything you save across the site in your account

The World’s Most Expensive Yachts—Including Some That Cost Billions

Though superyachts are already among the most costly consumer items available, the prices of the most expensive yachts in the world are still astounding. In recent decades, those with money to burn have settled on these floating palaces as an ideal locus for demonstrating their prosperity, and, as such, the global luxury yacht industry is undergoing a golden age. The world’s überwealthy think of their motor yachts as toys, and they’re constantly trying to outdo each other in scale, design, amenities, materials, and sheer profligacy.

Knowing this, what features does it take to own one of the most expensive yachts in existence? And how much do these opulent vessels actually cost? To that end, AD has compiled a list of the five priciest superyachts currently out on the water. As with many things connected to the very wealthy, details are shrouded in secrecy—often intentionally—to shield the assets from taxation or seizure, or to protect privacy.

Below, dive into the five reportedly most expensive yachts in the world.

5. Dubai ($400 million)

This 531-foot yacht is reportedly owned by United Arab Emirates Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai. Though it was originally planned for another Middle Eastern potentate, Prince Jefri Bolkiah of Brunei, he suddenly voided the contract in 2001. With exteriors designed by Andrew Winch and interiors by Platinum Yachts, this German-built Blohm + Voss vessel features several Jacuzzis, a pool inlaid with handmade mosaic tiles that is reportedly large enough to hold 115 people, a circular staircase, a discotheque with an appropriately sized dance floor, squash courts, a movie theater, a dining room for 90 guests (the other 25 presumably have to eat in the pool?), a helipad, and a submarine.

4. Topaz ($527 million)

Resembling a stealth bomber, this 483-foot ship is reportedly owned by Russian fertilizer and coal oligarch Andrey Melnichenko. With exteriors by Tim Heywood Design Ltd. and interior designs by Terence Disdale Design, this German-built Lürssen Yacht features a 2,500-square-foot primary bedroom, six guest suites (with moveable walls so they can be transformed into four grand staterooms), glassware and tableware fashioned from French crystal, a helicopter hangar, a 30-foot speedboat tender, and three swimming pools, including one with a glass-bottom dangling menacingly above a disco.

3. Azzam ($600 million)

This 590-foot ship is currently thought to be the largest private yacht in the world and one of the fastest, with a top speed of 35 miles per hour. To achieve this immense scale and speed, it required a pair of gas turbines and two stratospherically potent diesel engines, rendering it very difficult to build. It is reportedly owned by a member of the royal family of the UAE, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan. With exteriors by Nauta Yacht and interiors by French decorator Cristophe Leoni, this yacht was also built by Lürssen in Germany. The vessel is set apart by its early 19th-century Empire-style veneered furniture, as well as its state-of-the-art security systems, including a fully bulletproof primary suite and a high-tech missile deterrence capabilities.

2. Eclipse ($1.5 billion)

In addition to being the second-costliest, this 533-footer is thought to be the world’s second-largest private yacht. Owned by Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich , the ship was claimed to be located in Turkey and may be impounded as part of the United Kingdom’s sanctions against Russia. Designed by Terry Disdale and built by Blohm + Voss, it features two-dozen guest cabins, two swimming pools, two helipads, and multiple hot tubs. For privacy and security reasons, it hosts a missile detection system, bulletproof windows in the primary bedroom and on the bridge, an anti-paparazzi shield, and, when all of that fails, a mini-submarine that can take a few VIPs 164 feet under the ocean’s surface.

1. History Supreme ($4.8 billion)

History Supreme has never actually been seen in a major port, and rumors suggest that the yacht may not be real and instead just a publicity stunt. Reportedly owned by Malaysia’s richest man, Robert Kuok, and designed by Stuart Hughes in the UK, the yacht is only a paltry 100 feet long. Its worth is said to be derived from its lavish finishes, including a statue constructed from genuine Tyrannosaurus rex bones, a liquor bottle embedded with an 18.5-carat diamond, and a primary bedroom with one wall made from meteorite and another from a 24-karat gold Aquavista Panoramic Wall Aquarium. If you see it somewhere, let us know.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much is Jeff Bezos’s yacht?

This is why people like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos work to keep their yachts out of the public eye. Though we are not including Jeff Bezos’s yacht, Koru (Maori for “coil”), in this list because it is a sailing yacht and thus excluded from the realm of these motor yachts, it created controversy in the Netherlands when its presence became known. Jeff Bezos’s abided the $500 million price tag of Oceanco, the Dutch custom yacht builder, to create the 417-foot megayacht. But when the company, at Bezos’s behest, requested that a local bridge be dismantled to make way for its gigantic mast on its journey from the shipyard, public sentiment turned against the cento-billionaire, and Oceano shelved its request. Maybe a port like Monaco would be more accommodating?

Also not on this list is the world’s largest private yacht, reportedly owned by Alisher Usmanov. Though size and cost typically scale in the world of superyachts, this is not always the case (see #1 in this list.) Also, Somnio, the 728-feet dream-monikered yacht liner that tops our list of the world’s largest private yachts , isn’t quite done being constructed. And it is not, like most of the largest superyachts, privately owned by one individual or family—it’s a kind of floating condo, with 39 eight-figure homes available to potential owners solely by invitation.

History Supreme Yacht Most Expensive: Exploring the Ultimate Luxury Vessel

The History Supreme yacht is a marvel in the world of luxury and wealth, often touted as the most expensive yacht ever built. At an astounding $4.8 billion, this gold-plated superyacht is said to have been purchased by an anonymous Malaysian businessman after taking three years to complete with over 220,462 pounds of precious metals used in its construction source . Measuring 30.48 meters in length, this opulent vessel stands as a symbol of ultimate extravagance, surpassing even the largest yacht in the world, the Eclipse.

However, despite its reputation and jaw-dropping price tag, the existence of the History Supreme yacht is shrouded in controversy. Reports have surfaced stating that the yacht is not actually a real vessel source . The internet is rife with conflicting information, raising questions about the authenticity of this luxurious superyacht and leaving enthusiasts to ponder over its true nature.

Regardless of the uncertainty that surrounds the History Supreme, its legendary status and the sheer extravagance of the materials used in its alleged construction have undoubtedly captivated the world's attention. Whether real or simply a myth, the History Supreme yacht continues to be a fascinating topic of discussion for yacht aficionados and luxury enthusiasts alike.

History Supreme Yacht Overview

Design and features.

The History Supreme yacht, designed by renowned luxury designer Stuart Hughes, is one of the most exclusive and lavish vessels in the world. This stunning creation took over three years to complete and boasts many exquisite details[^( https://www.superyachts.com/news/story/history-supreme-the-andpound3-billion-gold-plated-yacht-1351^ )]. Designed with an emphasis on luxury and extravagance, it includes a variety of opulent amenities catering to the needs and desires of the world's elite.

Some of the standout features in the History Supreme yacht include a lavish dining area, meticulously crafted railings, and an impressive deck area for leisure and relaxation. With every inch of the yacht crafted to perfection and attention to detail, it ensures a truly unparalleled experience for its guests[^( https://www.boatsafe.com/yacht-history-supreme/^ )].

Materials Used

What sets the History Supreme yacht apart from other vessels is its extensive use of precious metals. An astounding 100,000 kg of gold and platinum were utilized in its construction, setting a new benchmark for opulence in the world of yachting[^( https://www.superyachts.com/news/story/history-supreme-the-andpound3-billion-gold-plated-yacht-1351^ )]. This extraordinary use of precious metals extends to nearly every surface on the boat, from the railings and deck to the dining area and even the anchor[^( https://www.boatsafe.com/yacht-history-supreme/^ )].

Purchased by an anonymous Malaysian businessman, the History Supreme yacht holds the title of the most expensive yacht ever sold[^( https://atlanticyachtandship.com/the-midas-touch-4-8-billion-history-supreme-most-expensive-yacht-ever-sold/^ )]. With its staggering use of 220,462 pounds of precious metals and unparalleled attention to detail, it is easy to see why the History Supreme yacht has garnered such acclaim and interest in the world of luxury yachting.

Record-Breaking Price

Factors of supreme value.

The extravagant History Supreme yacht holds the title of the most expensive yacht in the world, with a staggering price tag of $4.8 billion . One of the key factors contributing to its supreme value is the abundance of precious metals used in its construction.

Renowned luxury designer Stuart Hughes designed the History Supreme, employing over 100,000kg of gold and platinum in its creation. The construction process took more than three years to complete, and the result is a breathtaking vessel that stands alone at the pinnacle of luxury.

Some of the extravagantly luxurious features of the History Supreme include:

• Gold-plated rooms
• Base of the boat, deck, and dining area adorned with precious metals
• More than 220,462 pounds of gold and platinum materials

Comparison to Other Luxury Yachts

The History Supreme's incomparable price tag sets it in a league of its own, significantly surpassing even the most luxurious and expensive yachts on the market. By way of comparison, the fifth most expensive superyacht in the world is the Dubai , which has an estimated value of $400 million - a fraction of the History Supreme's monumental price.

In addition to the unmatched value of the precious metals used in the History Supreme, the exclusivity associated with owning the world's most expensive yacht and the remarkable design elements by the acclaimed Stuart Hughes place this vessel in a truly unique category of unparalleled luxury.

Ownership and Origin

Current owner.

The current owner of the History Supreme yacht is Malaysian businessman Robert Kuok . Kuok, a self-made billionaire, runs the Kuok Group, an international corporation with operations all around the world. He reportedly spent a third of his $12.8 billion fortune when he paid $4.8 billion for the History Supreme.

Manufacturer and Designer

The History Supreme yacht is a product of extraordinary craftsmanship and design. It was designed by Stuart Hughes , a world-renowned luxury designer. The project took just over three years to complete, and it is reported to be worth over £3 billion.

Built with around 100,000 kg of gold and platinum, the yacht is truly one of a kind. The precious metals are used to cover nearly every surface on the boat, including the railings, the deck, the dining area and even the base of the boat. The anchor is also made of gold .

The sheer amount of precious metals used in the construction of this magnificent yacht justifies its title as the most expensive yacht in the world.

Controversies and Criticisms

Environmental concerns.

One of the primary criticisms surrounding the History Supreme yacht is its potential environmental impact. The vessel is said to be plated with around 100,000kg of gold and platinum , which raises questions about the sustainability of using such vast quantities of precious metals. Extraction of these metals often leads to environmental degradation, including deforestation and pollution.

Access and Usage Limits

Another controversy related to the History Supreme yacht is the access and usage limitations. As a vessel worth billions of dollars, it's likely that only a select few individuals will be able to enjoy it. The exclusivity of the yacht is often met with criticism, as it highlights the stark differences between the extremely wealthy and the rest of society.

Moreover, the fact that the yacht has been rarely seen since its unveiling has led to speculation and skepticism around its legitimacy and existence. The lack of public access and the secretive nature of its whereabouts have only fueled concerns and criticisms, making the History Supreme yacht a controversial figure in the world of luxury vessels.

Related Articles

Sebastian Inlet State Park: A Comprehensive Guide

Yatch Essentials: Yes, we spelled it "Yatch" on Purpose to Match Common Search Trends

Bonita Springs Boat Show 2024: Discover the Latest Maritime Innovations and Trends

What Is the Risk When a PWC Passes Too Closely Behind Another Boat? Key Safety Concerns Explained

Fishing Boats for Sale: Expert Guide to Top Choices

Best Boat Wax 2024: Top Picks for Ultimate Protection and Shine

What is the Main Advantage of a Type IV PFD? Exploring Its Unique Benefits

The Primary Cause of Many Boating Accidents is Human Error: Insights and Prevention

The $4.8 Billion Vessel: Here's What Makes History Supreme The Most Expensive Yacht In The World

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Kim Kardashian Allegedly Gets An Adrenaline Rush Spending Money

Adele’s mega mansion renovations go over budget by millions, the hunger games movies ranked by box office performance., quick links, supreme history is a boat made of gold, history supreme's luxurious interiors and performance, rumors and speculations on the history supreme.

Billionaires appear to be constantly trying to outdo each other and themselves when it comes to purchasing ridiculously expensive and extravagant items . As such, it's possible that in 2011, an unidentified Malaysian, reported to be business billionaire Robert Kuok , may have gone to the top of the pack by purchasing History Supreme, a yacht composed of solid gold, platinum, meteoric stone, and a tyrannosaurus rex bone. Kuok is the self-made billionaire who runs the Kuok Group, an international corporation with operations all over the world. He reportedly spent a third of his $12.8 billion fortune when he paid $4.8 billion for the History Supreme. It's estimated that the 97-year-old will have a net worth of $12.6 billion by 2021, according to Forbes.

Gold-plated rooms are the norm on boats, where every luxury is taken care of for their guests. There are numerous swimming pools, dance floors, cinema halls, bars, and lounges, as well as a variety of other amenities for the billionaires who own these wonders of architectural design. But that's not all; owners board in helicopters that land on the deck of the boat for added panache. One of the world's top engines powers each yacht, which is a sleek and attractive craft. No one on board notices a jot of discomfort as they soar through the waves at top speed. In order to ensure that their sheen and durability are worth the price tag, the ships are built using the best materials available.

RELATED:  What Makes Stuart Hughes Diamond Edition The Most Expensive Suit In The World

History Supreme is the most expensive boat in the world. A Malaysian businessman, who wishes to remain unknown, commissioned Stuart Hughes to create it. According to media reports, the guy is Robert Kuok, the billionaire creator of Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts. When finished, the 30-meter yacht took three years to build and required about 100,000 kilograms of solid gold and platinum. On the boat's base, a thin film of gold metal has been applied to give it a luxurious look. The deck, dining area, railings, and even the anchor all feature a touch of gold trim. As one example of the yacht's lavish interior design, the major sleeping quarter features a T-Rex bone set on a meteoric stone wall.

A remarkable 220,462 pounds of precious metals were used during the vessel's three-year construction, according to the Daily Mail. It was all gold and platinum: the base of the boat, the deck, dining area, rails, and anchor. As Roman Abramovitch spent ten times as much for Eclipse, it has been believed that Robert Kuok bought the superyacht. The Forbes billionaires' list ranks Kuok as one of only three Malaysians with a net worth of $5 billion or more. The most likely bidder is Robert Kuok, the wealthiest man in Malaysia, with a net worth of $12.5 billion, according to the Business Insider.

There are precious metals used in the eating room, rails, and anchors; the vessel's base is covered in pure gold. In the superyacht's luxurious interior, there are central sleeping quarters and platinum embellishments, including wall features created from meteoric stones and actual T-Rex Dinosaur bones. One of the world's rarest diamonds , an 18.5-carat one, is featured in a luxury liquor bottle on board the ship. Take a look at the diamond-encrusted bespoke iPhone, which features two diamonds that can be swapped out for the home button. It's possible to forget that you're at sea if you don't notice the 24-carat gold-plated panoramic wall aquarium on board the boat.

There has been no mention of the superyacht's performance or other qualities as you may have realized this by now. Despite the thorough quality of the features discussed, it felt like they were just a random assortment of stuff they gave to justify such an excessive price tag. The fact that none of it was real was an even more ridiculous claim than the rumored price of $4.8 billion for a yacht.

When news of History Supreme spread, many representatives for Hughes acknowledged to various media sites, including in emails sent to Business Insider , that the reports contained accurate information. After that, there was complete and utter stillness coming from their end. The name History Supreme made the yacht sound like an insane vessel that not even a wealthy villain would buy, and there's a good reason for it. It was never a thing, and nor was it ever created, and no, it is not out there. History Supreme is likely the biggest boating fraud in the industry, despite what Google and a few reputable yachting websites want you to think.

Baia Yachts, based in Italy, issued a statement saying that the photos allegedly showing History Supreme posted on Hughes' website were stolen from its website and appropriated without permission at some point after the initial story was published. Hughes has not removed the post for whatever reason, and if it were up to him, he would still have you believe that he developed and sold the world's most costly boat, which the manufacturers constructed with more than 220,000 pounds of 24-carat gold.

READ NEXT:  Here's What Makes Pierchic Pizza The Most Expensive Pizza In The World

Sources: Super Yacht Times , Boat International , Lifestyle Asia

• Luxury Lifestyle
• The Rich & Powerful

Inside The Most Expensive Yacht Ever Sold

Billionaires are seemingly always seeking to top one another and themselves when it comes to buying jaw-droppingly expensive and ridiculous objects. In 2011, an anonymous Malaysian man, rumored to be business tycoon Robert Kuok, may have moved to the head of the pack when he allegedly bought the hilariously named History Supreme, a yacht made of such materials as solid gold, platinum, meteoric stone, and the bone of a tyrannosaurus rex. According to Business Insider , Kuok is a notoriously private self-made billionaire who heads the Kuok Group, a multinational conglomerate that owns assorted businesses around the world. When he bought the History Supreme for $4.8 billion, he reportedly spent a third of his $12.8 billion fortune. According to Forbes , in 2021 the 97-year-old is the 171st richest person in the world with a net worth of $12.6 billion.

As reported by the Daily Mail , the History Supreme is made up of over 100,000 kg (that's over 220,000 pounds) of platinum and gold; the entire base of the boat is wrapped in solid gold and the precious metals are used throughout, while the aforementioned meteoric stone and dinosaur bone make up a "wall feature" in the master bedroom. Additional features, per Jetset Magazine , include a luxury liquor bottle adorned with a rare 18.5 carat diamond, a custom iPhone encrusted in 500 diamonds, including two special interchangable home button diamonds, and a panoramic Aquavista wall aquarium made from 24-carat gold, presumably setting a new standard when it comes to panoramic yacht aquariums.

Is the History Supreme a hoax?

The History Supreme yacht is the handiwork of British designer Stuart Hughes who per his website has also made such collectibles for the ultrarich as the world's most expensive suit, the world's most expensive iPhone, the world's most expensive model car, and a solid gold Rolls Royce Phantom. According to Jetset Magazine , the "anonymous Malaysian business man" (probably Robert Kuok, shown above) commissioned Hughes via a friend in his yachting circle; Hughes never met the person for whom the yacht was intended, but was given completely  free reign in terms of the ship's design and construction. The project took three years to complete. 

To add to the History Supreme's mystique, some people don't believe it exists at all. Autoevolution says it "was never real, it was never made and no, it does not exist," noting that Italian company Baia Yachts issued a statement claiming the pictures of History Supreme's interior on Hughes' website were stolen from their site and used without permission. MoneyInc and YachtHarbor also lay out the case for the entire story being a hoax, with MoneyInc noting that at one point Kuok deconstructed his Hong Kong mansion into several smaller homes to avoid an ostentatious display of wealth, which makes his commission of the world's most luxurious yacht seem unlikely. Furthermore, as Kuok is known for staying out of the public eye, perhaps Hughes chose him as the supposed customer because he is hard to reach and therefore will not confirm or deny the yacht's existence. The History Supreme section of Hugh's website remains intact. 

Did the Eclipse get eclipsed?

Before the possible existence of the History Supreme, the title of world's most luxurious yacht belonged to the Eclipse (shown above). Per the Sydney Morning Herald , it was purchased in 2009 by Russian business tycoon Roman Abramovich for $590 million and includes two helipads, a movie theater, a sports complex, its own mini-submarine, and a missile defense system. Created by German shipbuilding company Blohm + Voss, an anonymous Russian yachting expert described it as a "big mansion on water ." When asked why it looked like a military frigate, the expert replied "It's a trend. Private yachts look like military boats these days. The yacht is a statement for many people. It's a statement about power." For those who wanted to try out that sort of morally dubious power without committing, the Eclipse was at one point available for commission for up to 30 guests and 75 crew members via SuperYachtsMonaco at $2 million per week, as reported by Business Insider . It's no longer listed on the site.

Per Robb Report , the world's largest yacht since its construction finished in 2013 has been the Azzam, which comes in at 592 feet and six inches long and can travel at a speed up to 30 knots. Built by yacht company Lürssen , it was commissioned by United Arab Emirates president Khalifa bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan (per Super Yacht Fan ) and has an interior described as sophisticated and luxe. 

• Bang & Olufsen
• Games consoles
• MP3 Players
• Luxury Aquarium
• Luxury Audio / Music systems
• Luxury Cars
• Luxury Fashion
• Luxury Furniture
• Luxury Homes
• Luxury Liquor
• Luxury Yachts

The HISTORY SUPREME

£ 3,000,000,000.00

Description

The worlds most unique yacht â HISTORY SUPREME â probably the most expensive.This project was commissioned for Stuart Hughes of Liverpool U.K. from an anonymous leading Malaysian business man.At 100ft the yacht took 3 years to complete , a circa of 100,000 kilograms of solid gold and platinum were added to make this an exciting project.All features inc deck , dinning area , rails , anchor , made from precious metals.The base of the vessel was wrapped in gold , a thin layer was formed to embrace this huge section.The main sleeping quarter was adorned with platinum accents of which included , wall feature , made from meteoric stone , with genuine Dinosaur bone shaved in from the raptor T – REX. A cost of £3 billion , the most exclusive yacht was born !Similar unique designs can be found on our other site www.goldstriker.co.uk

With great sorrow, we announce the passing of Stuart Hughes, the heart and soul behind Goldstriker International. Stuart’s journey came to a peaceful end, leaving a void in our hearts and an enduring legacy in the realm of luxury and craftsmanship.

Born on March 23, 1971 in the historic city of Liverpool, England, Stuart’s early life was steeped in the rich cultural tapestry of his hometown, known for its contribution to arts, music, and sports. These elements profoundly shaped Stuart, inspiring him to create Goldstriker International, a symbol of exclusivity, innovation, and extraordinary artisanship. Each creation was a testament to Stuart’s meticulous attention to detail, from the items themselves to the handmade boxes that presented them.

Stuart’s warmth and gracious spirit were as remarkable as his professional achievements. He navigated life and business with a serene confidence, an effortless charm that made every interaction memorable. His genuine kindness and approachable demeanor endeared him to all, leaving lasting impressions that went beyond the exquisite creations he brought into the world.

As we bid farewell to Stuart, we also acknowledge the closing of Goldstriker International. Without Stuart’s unique vision and passion, the continuation of the business he so lovingly built is unthinkable. This decision, though difficult, honours the fact that Goldstriker was a reflection of one man’s dream and exceptional talent.

Our hearts go out to Stuart’s family — his mother Helen, his children Daniel and Harry, Uncle Philip, Marie and Zara, and his beloved granddaughter Summer. We share in your sorrow and offer our unwavering support during this trying time.

As we reflect on Stuart’s remarkable life and legacy, we invite our cherished clients and friends to join us in celebrating the indelible mark he has left on our lives and the luxury industry. Stuart’s spirit and values will continue to inspire us, reminding us of the beauty of pursuing one’s passions with kindness, humility, and a gentle spirit.

With deepest sympathy and respect,

Stevan Brash Webmaster and Friend

How Supreme Court’s immunity ruling ‘transforms’ US presidency

Experts say shielding official presidential action from prosecution undermines rule of law and enables abuse of power.

Washington, DC –  The Supreme Court’s ruling on the scope of presidential immunity will “transform” the United States government, experts say, warning that the decision may undermine the rule of law in the country.

On Monday, the US top court weighed the broad claims former President Donald Trump made that his actions, while in office, were immune from prosecution. He currently faces criminal charges over his conduct during the final days of his presidency, when he was accused of attempting to overturn the 2020 elections .

Keep reading

Trump has immunity for official acts, us supreme court rules, ‘proud to go to prison’: ex-trump aide steve bannon begins sentence, us supreme court rules partial immunity for donald trump.

The court gave Trump a partial victory, ruling that former US presidents cannot be prosecuted for official actions taken while in office. “He is entitled to at least presumptive immunity,” the court majority wrote.

Monday’s ruling will likely delay two of Trump’s criminal cases beyond the presidential elections in November, as a lower court will first need to hear arguments over what constitutes an official action.

But beyond its immediate effect, the decision will have a “remarkable” impact on presidential powers, said David Super, a law professor at Georgetown University.

“This fundamentally transforms the presidency,” Super told Al Jazeera. “Here, the court says the president is still subject to the law, but they’ve made that much, much narrower than it ever was before. These are certainly the kinds of powers that are much more familiar to dictators than they are to presidents of democratic countries.”

The Supreme Court’s six conservative justices approved the ruling on Monday, while their three liberal counterparts opposed it.

The majority argued that, unless official actions were shielded from legal repercussions, a president could face retribution from political opponents upon leaving office.

But in the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that there are limits to presidential immunity.

“The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official,” Roberts wrote.

“The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.”

Presidents can still be prosecuted for robbing a liquor store, as Super put it, but not for any decision taken within their powers under the Constitution.

In fact, in its decision on Monday, the Supreme Court gave specific examples of where Trump’s behaviour in the election subversion case constituted official actions.

For example, the court ruled that conversations between Trump and Justice Department officials are “absolutely immune” from prosecution.

Federal prosecutors had argued that Trump tried to improperly influence the Justice Department to reverse his 2020 loss to Democratic President Joe Biden . Trump, the prosecutors said, also used “the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations”.

But by deeming Trump’s conversations with agency officials to be “official actions”, experts fear the Supreme Court may have endangered the independence of the Justice Department.

While the president appoints the attorney general, prosecutors are expected to operate without political interference and apply the law equally, in accordance with longstanding norms.

‘Assassinate a political rival? Immune’

While a lower court will decide how Monday’s ruling affects Trump’s criminal case, Claire Finkelstein, a professor of law and philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, said the “real import” of the decision is that it may allow future presidents to act with impunity.

“The long-term significance of this ruling should not be underestimated,” Finkelstein told Al Jazeera in a TV interview.

“What it says is that, if Donald Trump becomes president again, he can use his official capacity — in particular his core constitutional functions — to subvert the law, to shield himself from criminal liability, to distort justice in ways that favour himself.”

Matt Dallek, a political historian and professor at George Washington University, also said the court’s decision is “appalling”.

“The ruling is an assault on the constitutional limits to guard against abuses of power,” he told Al Jazeera.

In her dissent, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor forcefully rejected the ruling as well.

“The President of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution,” she wrote. “Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune.”

Super, the law professor, said Sotomayor’s assertion is not hyperbolic. The president is the commander-in-chief of the military.

“There’s no other official that can overrule the president in the command of the military. And so his giving the military an order would be absolutely immunised by this decision,” he told Al Jazeera.

Before Trump, no former US president had ever been indicted. The former president is facing four sets of criminal charges, including two related to election subversion.

Earlier this year, he was convicted in New York on charges of falsifying business documents to cover up hush-money payments made to a porn star ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Trump has denied wrongdoing in all cases, describing the charges against him as a “witch-hunt” driven by political rivals — chiefly Biden. He is running against Biden in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump, however, is not the first president to test the limits of presidential immunity. Richard Nixon could have faced charges over the Watergate scandal — when he used government resources to spy on political rivals — but he was pardoned by his successor, Gerald Ford, in 1974.

In response to another case against Nixon, the Supreme Court found that presidents were immune from civil damages as well.

Several officials in the Ronald Reagan administration were also indicted in the Iran-Contra affair, which saw the US illegally sell weapons to Iran to fund a rebel group in Nicaragua. But Reagan, who denied knowledge of the complex transactions, never faced charges.

More recently, Barack Obama’s administration refused to pursue legal charges against executive branch officials who authorised torture during the George W Bush presidency.

Chris Edelson — an assistant professor of government at the American University and author of Power Without Constraint: The Post 9/11 Presidency and National Security — said that, in modern history, US presidents have exercised power without “meaningful” restrictions.

“What’s different now is the court has now endorsed that, and we have a candidate for president who has made clear he will seek to rule as a dictator,” Edelson told Al Jazeera.

Trump said last year that he would be a dictator only on his first day in office, in order to “close the border”.

Edelson also called the court’s decision “radical”. He drew a comparison with Nixon’s time, when broad claims of presidential immunity drew outcry.

“When Richard Nixon famously said in a 1977 TV interview that, when the president does something, that means it’s not illegal, this was seen as a breathtaking statement,” he said.

“The court today has said that Nixon was actually right.”

Brian Osgood contributed to this report.

• Let’s Celebrate 90 Years of Impact!
• Become a $90-for-90 Supporter!
• Become a print subscriber
• Sign up for e-Newsletter

• Black History Month
• Women’s History Month
• Perspectives From Within
• Word on the Street
• Reaching Out From Within
• Mellaneous by Mel Reeves
• Help Is Here
• Women’s Wellness
• Parenting Today
• Minnesota Cancer Alliance Breast Cancer Gaps Project
• Timberwolves/NBA
• MN Wild/NHL
• Vikings/NFL
• Small Business Month Celebration
• Black Business Spotlight
• Finances FYI
• Arts + Culture
• Photo of the Week
• Announcements
• MSR Legacy Archives
• MSR Archives Search via MHS
• Submit an event!
• Sister Spokesman
• MSR 90th Anniversary Gala
• MSR Legacy Yacht Cruise

AOC files impeachment articles against Justices Thomas and Alito

New York Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, renowned for her unyielding and fiery approach to governance, has taken unprecedented steps against Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito by introducing articles of impeachment on Wednesday. This decisive action comes as accusations of corruption fly along with a deepening constitutional crisis.

Ocasio-Cortez arrived in Congress in 2019 with a flare, temperament, and youthful enthusiasm not seen in a long time. She also arrived as part of “The Squad,” and the 34-year-old firebrand, better known as AOC, has taken a no-holds-barred approach to governing, something rarely seen in Democrats. Now, she’s leading the charge against a heavily right-leaning and potentially corrupt U.S. Supreme Court.

“The unchecked corruption crisis on the Supreme Court has now spiraled into a Constitutional crisis threatening American democracy writ large,” Ocasio-Cortez declared in a press release. She condemned the justices for their “pattern of refusal to recuse” from cases involving their personal and financial interests and their “failure to disclose” millions of dollars in gifts spanning decades.

The impeachment resolutions are rooted in allegations that Thomas and Alito have repeatedly failed to disclose significant financial gifts and have refused to recuse themselves from cases with clear conflicts of interest. Thomas faces additional scrutiny for not recusing himself from cases involving his wife’s legal and financial interests. At the same time, Alito is accused of presiding over cases where he had a personal bias.

Ocasio-Cortez’s bold move follows a contentious 6-3 Supreme Court ruling that granted presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution, a decision that favored former President Trump amidst his multiple felony charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. “Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on social platform X.

Their affiliations with the “Stop the Steal” movement, which questioned the validity of the 2020 election, have made the allegations against Thomas and Alito worse. Thomas’s wife played a significant role in the movement, and Alito faced criticism for a flag associated with the movement flying over his home. Both justices have refused calls to recuse themselves from related cases, raising serious concerns about their impartiality.

In parallel with Ocasio-Cortez’s impeachment resolutions, Democratic lawmakers have proposed reforms to increase accountability within the Supreme Court. These include imposing term limits on justices, establishing an enforceable code of ethics, expanding the number of judges, and enhancing congressional oversight.

This week, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate Justice Clarence Thomas for potential violations of ethics, false statements, and tax laws. They highlighted solid evidence of Thomas’s failure to disclose over $267,000 in forgiven debt for a luxury motorcoach and numerous other undisclosed gifts from billionaire benefactors.

The senators stressed the need for thorough investigation and accountability, noting that no government official should be above the law. “Presented with opportunities to resolve questions about his conduct, Justice Thomas has maintained a suspicious silence,” they wrote.

Ocasio-Cortez underscored the gravity of the situation, concluding, “The integrity of our democracy is at stake. We must act decisively to uphold the rule of law and ensure that no one is above it, not even Supreme Court Justices.”

Stacy M. Brown is the NNPA Newswire senior national correspondent.

Support Black local news

Help amplify Black voices by donating to the MSR. Your contribution enables critical coverage of issues affecting the community and empowers authentic storytelling.

Donate Now!

Nil becomes college sports’ free agency , former mps supt. bernadeia johnson sounds alarm on kidney failure, stacy m. brown, you might also like.

Man subdued at Southdale sues police

High waters force Devin Brown to suspend Mississippi River trek

Survey finds Black adults develop unique coping skills for racism

Minneapolis unveils NARCAN vending machine to combat opioid overdoses

Taste of Minnesota delivers hometown flavor

Minnesota part of deeper look into ‘988’ crisis line effectiveness

Join the conversation below. Cancel reply

Read our latest e-Edition!

Blacklight On Sports w/Lisa Lissimore

• Home/Office Delivery
• Weekly e-newsletter
• MSR Newsstand Locations
• Send a news tip
• Privacy Policy

© 2023 Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder

• MN Cancer Alliance Breast Cancer Gaps Project
• Submit an Event
• MSR 90th Anniversary Gala Tickets
• MSR Legacy Yacht Cruise Tickets
• Become a $90-for-90 Supporter

Advertisement

Supreme Court Says Trump Has Some Immunity in Election Case

The ruling makes a distinction between official actions of a president, which have immunity, and those of a private citizen. In dissent, the court’s liberals lament a vast expansion of presidential power.

• Share full article

By Adam Liptak

Reporting from Washington

• July 1, 2024

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that former President Donald J. Trump is entitled to substantial immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to overturn the last election, a blockbuster decision in the heat of the 2024 campaign that vastly expanded presidential power.

The vote was 6 to 3, dividing along partisan lines. Its immediate practical effect will be to further complicate the case against Mr. Trump, with the chances that it will go before a jury ahead of the election now vanishingly remote and the charges against him, at a minimum, narrowed.

The decision amounted to a powerful statement by the court’s conservative majority that presidents should be insulated from the potential that actions they take in carrying out their official duties could later be used by political enemies to charge them with crimes.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Mr. Trump had at least presumptive immunity for his official acts. He added that the trial judge must undertake an intensive factual review to separate official and unofficial conduct and to assess whether prosecutors can overcome the presumption protecting Mr. Trump for his official conduct.

If Mr. Trump prevails at the polls, the issue could become moot since he could order the Justice Department to drop the charges.

The liberal wing, in some of the harshest dissents ever filed by justices of the Supreme Court, said the majority had created a kind of king not answerable to the law.

Broad immunity for official conduct is needed, the chief justice wrote, to protect “an energetic, independent executive.”

“The president therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. “That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy or party.”

The alternative, the chief justice wrote, is to invite tit-for-tat political reprisals.

“Virtually every president is criticized for insufficiently enforcing some aspect of federal law (such as drug, gun, immigration or environmental laws),” he wrote. “An enterprising prosecutor in a new administration may assert that a previous president violated that broad statute. Without immunity, such types of prosecutions of ex-presidents could quickly become routine.”

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the decision was gravely misguided. In a rare move and sign of deep disagreement, she summarized her dissent from the bench, making off-the-cuff remarks that underscored her frustration.

“Today’s decision to grant former presidents criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the presidency,” she wrote. “It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”

In her own dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that “the court has now declared for the first time in history that the most powerful official in the United States can (under circumstances yet to be fully determined) become a law unto himself.”

Mr. Trump embraced the outcome on social media, celebrating the ruling. “Big win for our constitution and democracy,” he wrote in all-capital letters. “Proud to be an American!”

President Biden warned that the decision set a dangerous precedent. “The power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even including the Supreme Court of the United States,” he said, urging voters to prevent his Republican rival from winning a second term. “The only limits will be self-imposed by the president alone.”

The chief justice’s opinion recounted the events surrounding the assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in an understated, almost antiseptic summary, while the dissents called them a singular threat to democracy. And where the chief justice stressed the importance of protecting all presidents, the dissents focused on Mr. Trump.

Chief Justice Roberts wrote that it was not the Supreme Court’s job to sift through the evidence and to separate protected conduct from the rest. “That analysis,” he wrote, “ultimately is best left to the lower courts to perform in the first instance.”

But he issued guideposts for Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, of the Federal District Court in Washington, who is overseeing the case.

Mr. Trump, the chief justice wrote, is “absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department officials.”

He added that Judge Chutkan should determine whether prosecutors can overcome Mr. Trump’s presumed immunity for his communications with Vice President Mike Pence.

“We therefore remand to the district court to assess in the first instance, with appropriate input from the parties, whether a prosecution involving Trump’s alleged attempts to influence the vice president’s oversight of the certification proceeding in his capacity as president of the Senate would pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the executive branch,” he wrote.

Other parts of the indictment against Mr. Trump, the chief justice said, require “a close analysis of the indictment’s extensive and interrelated allegations.”

That includes, he wrote, Mr. Trump’s statements on Jan. 6, among them ones he made at the rally on the Ellipse.

“Whether the tweets, that speech and Trump’s other communications on Jan. 6 involve official conduct may depend on the content and context of each,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a characteristically noncommittal passage.

He added, in a kind of refrain that ran through his opinion: “This necessarily fact-bound analysis is best performed initially by the district court.”

In all, the majority opinion was a broad defense of executive power and a detailed recipe for delay.

It was joined by the other Republican appointees: Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and, in part, Amy Coney Barrett.

In dissent, Justice Sotomayor wrote that “the long-term consequences of today’s decision are stark.”

“The court effectively creates a law-free zone around the president, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the founding,” she wrote, adding: “The president of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution.”

She gave examples: “Orders the Navy’s SEAL team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold on to power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”

Chief Justice Roberts rejected the prosecutors’ arguments that evidence about official acts could be presented to the jury for context and information about Mr. Trump’s motives.

Mr. Trump contended that he was entitled to absolute immunity from the charges, relying on a broad understanding of the separation of powers and a 1982 Supreme Court precedent that recognized such immunity in civil cases for actions taken by presidents within the “outer perimeter” of their official responsibilities.

Lower courts rejected that claim.

“Whatever immunities a sitting president may enjoy,” Judge Chutkan wrote , “the United States has only one chief executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong ‘get out of jail free’ pass.”

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed. “For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant,” the panel wrote in an unsigned decision . “But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as president no longer protects him against this prosecution.”

In agreeing to hear the case, the Supreme Court said it would decide this question: “whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.”

The court heard two other cases this term concerning the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.

In March, the court unanimously rejected an attempt to bar Mr. Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which makes people who engage in insurrection ineligible to hold office. The court, without discussing whether Mr. Trump was covered by the provision, ruled that states may not use it to exclude candidates for the presidency from the ballot.

On Friday, the court ruled that federal prosecutors had improperly used an obstruction law to prosecute some members of the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. Two of the four charges against Mr. Trump are based on that law. In a footnote on Monday, Chief Justice Roberts wrote that “if necessary, the district court should determine in the first instance” whether those charges may proceed in light of the decision last week.

The court decided the case restoring Mr. Trump to the ballot at a brisk pace, hearing arguments a month after agreeing to and issuing its decision a month after that.

The immunity case has moved at a considerably slower tempo. In December, in asking the justices to leapfrog the appeals court and hear the case immediately, Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the prosecution, wrote that “it is of imperative public importance that respond­ent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this court.” He added that “only this court can definitively resolve them.”

The justices denied Mr. Smith’s petition 11 days after he filed it, in a brief order without noted dissents.

After the appeals court ruled against Mr. Trump, he asked the Supreme Court to intervene. Sixteen days later, on Feb. 28, the court agreed to hear his appeal, scheduling arguments for almost two months later, on the last day of the term. Another two months have passed since then.

At the argument, several of the conservative justices did not seem inclined to examine the details of the charges against Mr. Trump. Instead, they said, the court should issue a ruling that applies to presidential power generally.

“We’re writing a rule for the ages,” Justice Gorsuch said.

The court’s announcement of that rule on Monday elicited some of the sharpest dissents ever by justices of the Supreme Court.

Justice Jackson, for instance, said the practical consequences of the majority opinion “are a five-alarm fire that threatens to consume democratic self-governance and the normal operations of our government.”

Before reading from her prepared remarks, Justice Sotomayor appeared to address the chief justice directly: “Saying it so doesn’t make it so.”

She quoted mockingly from the majority’s opinion on how criminal prosecutions would have an even more chilling effect on the ability of a president to take “bold and unhesitating action.”

“Think about that — that makes no sense,” she said.

In her written dissent, Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Jackson and Elena Kagan, said: “The relationship between the president and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.”

Justice Sotomayor ended her opinion in unusual fashion. “With fear for our democracy,” she wrote, “I dissent.”

Chief Justice Roberts said the dissents were overwrought.

“They strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate,” he wrote, “to what the court actually does today — conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the president and his attorney general, and then remand to the lower courts to determine ‘in the first instance’ whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.”

Linda Qiu contributed reporting.

Adam Liptak covers the Supreme Court and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law for 14 years before joining The Times in 2002. More about Adam Liptak

• Entertainment
• Latest Mortgage Rates
• Credit Cards
• Restaurants
• Food & Drink
• Lamborghini
• Aston Martin
• Rolls Royce
• Harley Davidson
• Honda Motorcycles
• BMW Motorcycles
• Triumph Motorcycles
• Indian Motorcycles
• Patek Philippe
• A. Lange & Söhne
• Audemars Piguet
• Jaeger-LeCoultre
• Vacheron Constantin
• Electronics
• Collectibles

A Closer Look at the $4.8 Billion History Supreme

Most of us do not wish for much money; a million dollars is enough to make us turn our lives around, but there are always people who are looking for more. While you are praying for a car, another wants a private jet; while you are looking for more space in your garage, another is preparing to buy an entire house. We are not equal, and that is the reason why when you hear that someone is willing to buy a yacht for $4.8 billion, you have to ask who it is. A yacht that goes by the name "History Supreme" has you thinking that it contains lots of history either in its construction or decorations yet the only thing historical about the $4.8 billion yacht is the use of extinct bones. Stuart Hughes made the headlines eight years ago with the declaration that he had taken three years to complete building History Supreme, so we had to learn more about it.

Why be valued so highly?

Multi-billionaires have competed against each other to see whose yacht is the longest and when we think that we have found the winner another boat is made and it outshines the rest. History Supreme was not about being the longest; it only was going to be 100 feet long, but the materials used to make it would ensure that no other yacht ever came close to its price. Manufacturers value their products depending on the cost of production and for Stuart, the boat which he also claimed the buyer had given him free rein to make, the construction meant going all out hence the astronomical price. History Supreme was reportedly made from:

Precious metals

As little girls boast of wearing nothing but gold-coated earrings since any other will cause them to have allergic reactions, they already feel like they own the world with their jewelry all because it has a touch of gold. Well, imagine owning a vessel whose base is made from solid gold. The anonymous businessman who bought the History Supreme took pride in owning a yacht whose base was made from gold; a thin layer is formed to coat its entire base, according to Stuart Hughes.

The sleeping quarters were allegedly made from platinum and together, both the platinum and gold used weighed 100,000 kilograms. As if that is not enough of the costly expenses, holding down the vessel was an anchor also made from precious metals while the railings, dining area, and deck also were constructed from precious metals, according to Luxury Launches.

Bones of an extinct animal

The moment you learn that something no longer exists, you can be sure that finding it is going to be nearly impossible and when you do, the value will be too high for you to afford probably. Such is the case with the History Supreme, which only a multi-billionaire would dare think about buying. Stuart allegedly used the bones of an extinct dinosaur named "Tyrannosaurus Rex" or simply "T. Rex." Why anyone would choose to have the bone shavings of a carnivorous dinosaur in their bedroom is a question that only Stuart can answer given that he supposedly came up with the design.

Meteoric stone

Stuart was looking to outdo renowned yacht designers when he said that History Supreme also contained Meteoric stones in the construction of the walls of the main sleeping quarters. The significance of having meteoric stones is still about driving the price of History Supreme upwards. Although Stuart did not reveal the exact meteoric stones used, maybe the fact that they are rarer than gold and a pound could be worth as much as $1 million is enough to make us believe that History Supreme is worth every penny included in its high cost.

Time spent constructing it

Everyone values their time differently; Josh Turner sang that time is love, but to a businessman, time is money. Stuart valued his time so much that he must have factored in the three years spent constructing History Supreme in the price when he quoted the £3 billion cost.

Too good to be true

In 2011, mainstream media went into a frenzy with the news that Stuart Hughes was going to make the most expensive in the world after Stuart claimed the project had been commissioned from an anonymous Malaysian businessman. The cost of the project was £3 billion according to Stuart Hughes and at such an amount is was apparent that someone somewhere was ready to splurge on a luxurious yacht, but the question remained as to who the mysterious buyer was.

As always when questions are unanswered, curiosity gets the better of us as we wonder if what we are being told is the truth or fabricated stories. Business Insider had assumed that the billionaire who bought the yacht was Robert Kuok but later discovered that the businessman whose net worth stood at a staggering $12.5 billion at the time, had deconstructed his Hong Kong mansion to avoid displaying his wealth. Now, that is not the behavior of someone who would spend $4.8 billion on a yacht.

We are always warned that if it sounds or looks too good to be true, it usually is, and in this instance, that was the case. Upon investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was but a hoax which the media had been gullible enough to believe in without doing their due diligence before reporting the lies to the public. It is shocking how far people are willing to go to make a name or themselves because Stuart Hughes was desperate enough to be noticed. According to Yacht Harbour, he went to the website of Baia Yachts and took pictures from there which he used to try and fool the public into believing he was making the most expensive yacht worldwide.

Our instincts should, however, have told us that billionaires are not interested in having a connection with the extinct animals by building a yacht with their bones. It is all about ego and for a billionaire a yacht should be something that gives him personal satisfaction, like Roman Abramovich's Eclipse which he had built to eclipse every other boat in the sea with regards to length.

Written by  Dana Hanson

Related articles, appreciating the work of british yacht designer mark berryman.

A Closer Look at the 351-Foot Sailing Yacht "Project Sonata"

A Closer Look at the Royal Huisman's Striking Blue Superyacht PHI

The top 20 celebrity yachts in the world.

A Closer Look at David and Victoria Beckham's Yacht SeaFair

17 Most Expensive Yachts in the World

A closer look at tankoa's t500 tethys, a closer look at x-yachts new x49e electric sailing boat.

Wealth Insight! Subscribe to our Exclusive Newsletter

• Newsletters
• Account Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content Account Sign out

Trump Immunity Ruling Will Be John Roberts’ Legacy to American Democracy

This is part of  Opinionpalooza , Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. Alongside  Amicus , we kicked things off this year by explaining  How Originalism Ate the Law . The best way to support our work is by joining  Slate Plus . (If you are already a member, consider a  donation  or  merch !)

Is the Supreme Court obtuse or disingenuous? In its awful immunity ruling on Monday benefiting Donald Trump, the court seems so worried about future threats to democracy that could come from the possibility of bogus future criminal prosecutions of former presidents that it is willing to let a legitimate election subversion prosecution over a current threat against democracy go by the wayside.

As Mark Joseph Stern explained , the court’s ruling gives an exceedingly broad scope to the immunity afforded presidents from liability for official acts. It defined official acts so broadly as to include not only communications with officials at the Justice Department but even giving public speeches, as Trump did on Jan. 6, 2021, that encouraged political violence at the Capitol: “most of a President’s public communications are likely to fall comfortably within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities.” And even as to unofficial acts for which there is no immunity, a prosecutor could not rely on any official acts to overcome that immunity. The bottom line is that trying to prosecute a former president for criminal activity during the president’s time in office will be all but impossible.

The writing was on the wall back in the April oral arguments in Trump v. United States when Justice Neil Gorsuch said the Supreme Court’s task was writing an opinion “for the ages” and when Justice Samuel Alito opined, from some bizarre alternative universe, that it is the threat of criminal liability after the end of the presidential term (as opposed to its absence) that could cause an incumbent president not to leave office peaceably. Indeed, the intentional delay the court took—to the benefit of Trump—was clear way before then, when the court refused to expedite this case as the special counsel requested back in December and when it slow-walked the case , setting it for the last day of arguments (and now releasing the opinion on the last day of the term).

These justices were always thinking about an abstract problem that could occur in 2072 or 2114 with presidential power and not about the problems the United States faces today with the attempt at election subversion undertaken by Donald Trump and his allies in 2020.

Months ago, many of us were wondering why the court was dragging its feet, and I even naïvely suggested the court could behind the scenes be crafting a “grand bargain” where it decided in favor of Trump when Colorado tried to remove him from the ballot, to be followed by a quick rejection of immunity, allowing his election subversion trial to move forward before the election. Reality was in fact the opposite. In Monday’s opinion, the court accused the lower courts of moving way too quickly and not engaging in thorough enough legal analysis and factual development. Their message was, Hey guys, take it slow, presidential immunity for criminal acts is really important .

The court was right about importance, but not in the way that it thought. We have an ongoing threat to American democracy going on today, right now, in this country. In 2020, the incumbent president tried to overturn the results of a fairly conducted election by trying to manipulate the rules for states to certify their presidential electors and Congress to count those Electoral College votes. He did that by making wholly unsubstantiated claims of fraud and irregularities and pressuring Justice Department officials, state election administrators, state legislators, and others to change fair results. When that failed, he aimed and fired his armed supporters at the U.S. Capitol to disrupt the proceedings for certifying the election and block the peaceful transfer of power.

Not only did this presidential candidate not face any legal consequences yet for these actions, but he is the front-runner to be president again, now armed with a new Supreme Court opinion that gives him vastly expanded powers that he would no doubt use if he is put back in office. Who knows what he will do in 2025 with a green light to engage in all kinds of criminal activity?

Tellingly, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion spends not a moment condemning the violence in the Capitol on Jan. 6 or saying how awful the allegations against Trump are if true, or even celebrating peaceful transitions of power and reaffirming American democracy. It fell to Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson to do this in their dissenting opinions in this case, in the Fisher case, and in Trump v. Anderson , the case holding that Colorado could not remove Trump from the ballot on grounds that Trump engaged in insurrection in violation of Section 3 of the 14 th Amendment.

It is not as though Roberts does not know how to celebrate democracy or call for its protection when he thinks it’s important. In a 2014 campaign finance case , for example, Roberts opened with the line:

There is no right more basic in our democracy than the right to participate in electing our political leaders. Citizens can exercise that right in a variety of ways: They can run for office themselves, vote, urge others to vote for a particular candidate, volunteer to work on a campaign, and contribute to a candidate’s campaign. This case is about the last of those options.

Near the end of his majority opinion in the immunity ruling, Roberts plays the role of the faux minimalist, as he often likes to do, pretending that when he is making major changes in the law he is really doing very little. He did this, for example, in the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder case killing off a key part of the Voting Rights Act. There he told us that Congress could tinker and fix the formula used to figure out which states need federal supervision of their voting rules, and that there were other voting rights protections under the law. He wrote that knowing Congress would not act. The Roberts court would then whittle away those other protections in subsequent years.

In Monday’s opinion, Roberts pushes back against dissents that “strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today—conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the President and his Attorney General, and then remand to the lower courts to determine ‘in the first instance’ whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.” At best, the process that Roberts has set out will take months, and future appeals to the United States Supreme Court before any trial could even be possible, under rules that make Trump almost a prohibitive favorite to defeat the claims before there is even a trial. At worst, a reelected Trump will simply shut down the prosecution once he’s back in office.

Even putting aside the risks for future presidential authoritarianism, Roberts offers no acknowledgement that the court’s fact-intensive, slow-moving process has let Donald Trump run out the clock on claims of election subversion in 2020. Roberts surely was aware that this was an implication of the decision and surely the risks to democracy from this decision had to have crossed his mind.

Roberts’ failure to even acknowledge those risks, even if he thought the risks were worth taking because of larger principles at stake of protecting the presidency from bogus prosecutions in the future, is going to be Roberts’ legacy for American democracy. That is, if our democracy survives.

• AMERICA’S CUP
• THE OCEAN RACE
• VENDÉE GLOBE

History Supreme, the solid gold yacht

The solid gold yacht

Robert Kuok, the richest man in Malaysia, with a net worth of $ 12.5 billion, spent an incredible $ 3.8 BILLION on a yacht, made of solid gold.

This yacht, with gold and dinosaur bones, is worth ten times more than Roman Abramovitch’s Eclipse, which previously held the title of the most expensive yacht in the world.

Kuok is the founder of the Shangri La hotel group, which operates luxury hotels in Asia, but most of his wealth comes from his stake in Wilmar, the world’s largest publicly traded palm oil company. .

The luxury took three years to complete and is covered in 100,000 kilograms of precious metals, including a solid gold hull. The master bedroom is particularly luxurious: it is adorned in platinum and has wall art made of meteoric stone and the bones of a Tyrannosaurus Rex.

However, it stands out from the History Supreme at 98.4 feet.

Details about the ship, including why it was so expensive, had nothing to do with onboard technology, amenities, performance, or even fuel efficiency.

The project was commissioned to Stuart Hughes, famous British designer and jeweler of high-end gadgets, which includes among his extravagant creations an iPhone version produced with 135 grams of 24-karat gold and 600 white diamonds. and a rare black diamond, valued at $ 16 million. And since he wanted a truly exclusive container, he gave the designer carte blanche to lead the way in the use of precious materials.

Another work of the designer, available with the superyacht, is a bottle of luxury liquor with an 18.5 carat diamond, the D ’Amalfi Limoncello Supreme, valued at $ 35 million. Because alcohol is never good enough in a normal bottle. There is also a panoramic wall aquarium made from solid 24 karat gold, around 150 pounds.

It turns out that History Supreme was designed to be the most decadent piece of naval architecture ever created. It’s literally wrapped in solid gold and platinum, includes gemstones in the design, and depending on who you believe, it comes with several other famous Hughes creations, some more quirky than others.

The entire container actually includes about 220,463 pounds of solid gold as a building material. The base is wrapped in gold, and is also incorporated into the deck, dining room, railings and anchor, and kitchenware. The stairs on the upper deck are said to be made of solid gold.

Platinum is also used a lot, especially in the chef’s kitchen and master suite, which, to boot, also features a wall made from meteoric stone and a sculpture made from real T-Rex dinosaur bone sourced from Arizona. The bone is only worth about $ 89,000.

In total, the British jeweler applied 100,000 kilos of 24-karat gold to the construction of the History Supreme.

“It was the most ambitious project I have done so far. It took three years of planning, ”revealed designer and jeweler Stuart Hughes.

Share this:

One 16 : the spanish project that turns your jet ski into a boat, zeelander yachts – showcase at palm beach international boat show 2024, navier 30 electric hydrofoil boat – the future of motion.

Most Popular

Final at big air kite and wingfoil world championship in gran canaria, sailgp launches fan-first ar and vr app experience, tp52 world championship in newport, big air kitesurfing world cup in gran canaria, riva yacht presents his 76 ’perseo super, narke gt95 electric jet ski, iddes yachts earth 300 explorer yacht.

What Is Yacht History Supreme? (The Fascinating Story Behind It)

For centuries, luxury yachting has been a long-time favorite among the wealthy, a symbol of their wealth and success.

Today, one yacht stands out among the rest for its sheer opulence and grandeurthe Yacht History Supreme.

This remarkable vessel has been at the center of attention for its luxurious amenities and features, as well as its mysterious owner.

This article will explore the fascinating story behind the Yacht History Supreme, from its history of luxury yachting to its recent sightings.

Get ready to explore the world of super yachts and experience the grandeur of the Yacht History Supreme!.

Table of Contents

Short Answer

Yacht History Supreme is a luxury yacht constructed by the Australian company, History Supreme.

It was designed by the British designer, Luiz de Basto, and is constructed from 100,000 kg of solid gold and platinum.

It is said to be the most expensive yacht in the world, with an estimated cost of $4.

The yacht features a master bedroom that is made from a single piece of 24-carat gold, and a sculpture of a T-Rex dinosaur made from bone-like material.

History of Luxury Yachting

The history of luxury yachting dates back centuries, when wealthy European families would use their ships to explore the world, show off their status, and even host extravagant parties.

The history of luxury yachting has evolved over time, as advances in technology have made it easier to build bigger and more luxurious vessels.

Today, luxury yachting is a billion-dollar industry, with people from all over the world investing in some of the most expensive and extravagant yachts ever built.

One of the most iconic yachts in the luxury yachting world is the Yacht History Supreme.

Built in 2011 by the Dutch-based firm, Lrssen Yachts, the Yacht History Supreme is one of the worlds most expensive and luxurious yachts.

It measures over 100 meters in length and features a gold-plated exterior, diamond-encrusted furnishings, and a helipad.

It also has a master suite, two VIP cabins, and other luxurious amenities.

The yacht is owned by an anonymous Malaysian businessman and is often seen off the coast of Monaco.

The Yacht History Supreme is a testament to the advances in technology and luxury that have been made in the world of yachting over the years.

It is a stunning symbol of the progress that has been made in the luxury yachting industry and a reminder of the importance of creating the most luxurious and opulent experiences for those who can afford it.

Yacht History Supreme Overview

Yacht History Supreme is a luxury yacht that stands out from the rest.

Built in 2011 by the prestigious Dutch-based firm, Lrssen Yachts, the vessel is one of the worlds most expensive and luxurious yachts, featuring a golden exterior, diamond-encrusted furnishings, and a helipad.

Measuring over 100 meters in length, the yacht has a master suite, two VIP cabins, and other luxurious amenities.

Its owner is an anonymous Malaysian businessman who has chosen to remain anonymous and is often seen off the coast of Monaco.

The interior of the yacht is just as stunning as its exterior.

The main deck features a luxurious salon and a dining room with an impressive glass table.

The yacht also features a gym and a sauna, as well as a private movie theater.

The upper deck is also filled with luxurious amenities, such as a bar and a jacuzzi.

The exterior of the yacht is just as luxurious and impressive.

The golden exterior is encrusted with diamonds, and the yacht also features a helipad.

The vessel is powered by two MTU diesel engines and is capable of reaching a top speed of 17 knots.

Yacht History Supreme is a symbol of luxury and extravagance, and its impressive features make it stand out from the rest.

Its golden exterior and diamond-encrusted furnishings make it one of the most luxurious yachts in the world.

Its no wonder that this yacht is often seen off the coast of Monaco, as its owner enjoys the luxury and extravagance of the vessel.

Features of Yacht History Supreme

Yacht History Supreme is a marvel of luxury and engineering, built in 2011 by the renowned Dutch-based firm Lrssen Yachts.

This luxurious yacht is an impressive 100 meters in length, and features a golden exterior, diamond-encrusted furnishings, and a helipad.

Inside, the yacht is outfitted with an opulent master suite, two VIP cabins, and other luxurious amenities.

The interior is decorated with fine woods, marble floors, and crystal fixtures.

The exterior features a large area for sunbathing, a Jacuzzi, and an outdoor bar.

The yacht also includes a spa, gym, and cinema.

The Yacht History Supreme is owned by an anonymous Malaysian businessman and is often seen off the coast of Monaco.

This impressive vessel is powered by twin MTU 20V4000 M93L engines and boasts a top speed of 16 knots.

It is equipped with the latest navigation, communications, and entertainment systems, making it the perfect choice for a luxurious, stylish getaway.

Luxurious Amenities of Yacht History Supreme

The Yacht History Supreme is truly one of the worlds most luxurious vessels.

Its golden exterior is complemented by its diamond-encrusted furnishings, making it a sight to behold.

The yacht is over 100 meters in length and boasts a master suite, two VIP cabins, and other lavish amenities.

The interior of the yacht is as luxurious as its exterior.

The master suite features a private balcony and a stunning view.

Guests can relax in the VIP cabins, which are equipped with private lounges and bathrooms.

The yacht also has a helipad, allowing for easy access to the vessel.

Other amenities include a spa with a sauna and massage rooms, a gym, a wine cellar, and an outdoor cinema.

It is one of the most expensive yachts in the world, and its luxurious amenities are sure to make any voyage a memorable one.

Whether youre looking to relax in a private balcony or enjoy a movie under the stars, the Yacht History Supreme has something for everyone.

The Yacht’s Owner

The Yacht History Supreme is owned by an anonymous Malaysian businessman, who has chosen to remain unknown to the public.

However, details of the owner have been slowly revealed as the yacht has been seen in various ports around the world.

The yacht is estimated to have cost somewhere between $4.

5 billion dollars, making it one of the most expensive yachts ever built.

This is a testament to the wealth and extravagance of its owner who, it is thought, is a successful businessman from Malaysia.

What makes the Yacht History Supreme so unique is its luxurious design and amenities.

It boasts a golden exterior, diamond-encrusted furnishings, and a helipad, which make it stand out from the rest.

It also measures over 100 meters in length, making it one of the largest yachts ever built.

Inside, the yacht features a master suite, two VIP cabins, and other luxurious amenities.

The Yacht History Supreme is often seen off the coast of Monaco and other locations around the world.

This is believed to be due to its anonymous owner’s preference for privacy and luxury.

The yacht has become a symbol of the wealth and power of its owner, who remains anonymous to this day.

The Yacht’s Grandeur

The Yacht History Supreme is truly a sight to behold.

From the outside, it is coated in a gold-plated finish, giving it a regal and luxurious feel.

The yacht is over 100 meters in length and features a master suite, two VIP cabins, and other luxurious amenities.

Its interior is adorned with diamond-encrusted furnishings, making it one of the most luxurious yachts in the world.

The yacht also has a helipad, allowing its owner to come and go in grand style.

It is the perfect combination of grandeur and luxury, making it the perfect vessel for the well-heeled traveler.

Recent Sightings of Yacht History Supreme

Yacht History Supreme has become a regular sight off the coast of Monaco, often spotted by tourists and locals alike.

Its impossible to miss, with its shining golden exterior and gleaming diamond-encrusted furnishings.

The yacht measures over 100 meters in length, and has a master suite, two VIP cabins, and many other luxurious amenities.

Its owner, an anonymous Malaysian businessman, has been seen on board numerous times, enjoying the sunshine, crystal-clear water, and the sounds of Monaco.

This yacht is often seen in the company of other luxury vessels, including mega yachts, super yachts, and even the occasional cruise liner.

Its a sight to behold, and one thats enjoyed by many who are lucky enough to witness it.

Yacht History Supreme has become an iconic symbol of wealth and luxury, and its not hard to see why.

The yachts helipad is also a popular spot for tourists to take pictures, as it provides a spectacular view of Monacos coastline.

Final Thoughts

Yacht History Supreme is an impressive feat of luxury yacht engineering and craftsmanship.

Its golden exterior, diamond-encrusted furnishings, and other luxurious amenities make it one of the most expensive and luxurious yachts in the world.

Owned by an anonymous Malaysian businessman, Yacht History Supreme has been seen off the coast of Monaco and is a sight to behold.

To truly appreciate the grandeur of Yacht History Supreme, we suggest taking a trip to Monaco and seeing it for yourself.

James Frami

At the age of 15, he and four other friends from his neighborhood constructed their first boat. He has been sailing for almost 30 years and has a wealth of knowledge that he wants to share with others.

Recent Posts

When Was Banana Boat Song Released? (HISTORICAL INSIGHTS)

The "Banana Boat Song" was released in 1956 by Harry Belafonte. This calypso-style song, also known as "Day-O," became a huge hit and remains popular to this day for its catchy tune and upbeat...

How to Make Banana Boat Smoothie King? (DELICIOUS RECIPE REVEALED)

To make a Banana Boat Smoothie King smoothie at home, start by gathering the ingredients: a ripe banana, peanut butter, chocolate protein powder, almond milk, and ice. Blend the banana, a scoop of...