blue water cruising catamaran vs monohull

Yachting Monthly

• Digital edition

Monohull or multihull: which is best for blue water?

• Chris Beeson
• March 29, 2016

As former editor of Yachting World, David Glenn has plenty of experience of both monohull and multihull cruising. Here he weighs up the pros and cons

One hull, or two? Your choice will define your life afloat Credit: David Glenn

Through the binoculars I could see masts off Basil’s Bar on Mustique. Their lack of movement suggested a fine anchorage, sheltered from the tradewind-driven swell that builds up in the channel between Mustique and Bequia. It soon became apparent that most belonged to cats, immune from the rolling monohulls like ours would endure if we were to stop in this otherwise enticing bay.

More anchorages in a multi

Cats galore off the Soggy Dollar Bar, Jost van Dyke: too shallow for a fixed keel monohull of similar size

Stability is one of the truly great advantages of a cruising multihull. Not just at sea where the tiresome business of heeling is something that simply doesn’t – or shouldn’t – happen to any great extent, but at anchor too. It dramatically widens one’s choice of anchorages to include those affected by swell – not uncommon in the Caribbean, for instance, where a subtle change in wind direction can make a previously flat calm anchorage unbearable in a monohull. Its comparatively shoal draught widens the choice still further.

I grew up with monohulls, own one, and frankly wouldn’t consider a multihull for the sort of sailing I do. In northern European waters, marina berthing is a regular necessity and completely safe open anchorages are few and far between.

No rolling or heeling, 360° views and one-level living, as here on a Lagoon 52, appeal to many

But if I were to undertake some serious blue water cruising and I wanted family and friends genuinely to enjoy being afloat, particularly those less experienced, a multihull would have to be a consideration. I would have to put aside the question of aesthetics – let’s face it, they’re ugly beasts – and forego that unique and satisfying sensation of a yacht sailing well, because to date I have not experienced it in a cruising multihull. And that’s quite a sacrifice.

More space in a multi

My attitude changed after chartering catamarans in the Caribbean and Mediterranean. The need to accommodate two families comprising largely of teenage children made the choice of a multihull a no-brainer. In a 46-footer we could accommodate a party of 10 in comfort and the paraphernalia demanded by youth, like surfboards, windsurfers, kites and snorkelling kit, without feeling jammed in.

One-level living makes a big difference when sailing as a famly

The cavernous berths in the ends of the hulls, the wide saloon-cum-galley with its panoramic view and the inside/outside lifestyle made possible by the juxtaposition of the big aft deck and the same level saloon, got the entire crew onside instantly.

As an outside living space, with a trampoline at one end and a massive aft deck at the other, there is simply no comparison with a monohull of the same length. So space, linked to stability, makes for an experience that everyone, even the timid and novices, will find hard not to enjoy.

No speed difference

A multihull, like this Moorings 46, has abundant stowage on deck and below, but filling it all will slow her down

Load-carrying ability is a double-edged sword. On the up side there is room for a big crew and its kit, much more fresh water tankage than a monohull, eliminating the need for an expensive, temperamental watermaker, and finding space for a generator should be easy.

On the down side the temptation to overload will probably cancel out any perceived performance advantage. Multihulls can be relatively quick in the right offwind conditions, but if they are heavily laden – as they will be for blue water cruising – there really is no significant speed advantage.

The Gunboat 66 Phaedo 1 piles on the speed, but for blue water cruisers, comfort and stowage is more important than pace

Some new designs such as Gunboat and Outremer have concentrated on performance, but most clients aren’t overly concerned about outright speed and are happy to trade performance for the considerable comfort offered by brands like Lagoon, Broadblue, the Fontaine Pajot stable, Leopard, Catana, Privilege and others.

Mono sails better

Monohulls, like this Amel 55, sail better upwind, and her ballast keel adds displacement, which means comfort when it’s rough. Multihulls can develop an unpleasant motion in a big sea

Upwind, most cruising multihulls won’t point like a monohull with a deeper keel, and when it gets lumpy and fresh, the motion can become distinctly unpleasant. You have to keep a particularly careful eye on sail area too, but more of that in a moment.

In 2011 I was involved in a test of three cruising catamarans and among my fellow judges was multihull design legend Nigel Irens. He pointed out that catamaran buyers have voted for accommodation (which means weight) over performance, so the dilemma of mixing the two has largely disappeared. With it went the spectre of capsize because, relative to their displacement and beam, the modern cruising catamaran is under-canvassed. But that doesn’t mean that sailors can simply set sail and go in any weather.

‘Speed limits’ on a multi

On a multihull, it’s more important to know when to reef. Set speed limits and stick to them

Also on the panel was Brian Thompson, the lone Brit on board the 130ft French trimaran Banque Populaire V that sailed around the world in under 46 days. He told me that the tell-tale signs for knowing when to reef are far more subtle on a multihull. Apart from instinct, Brian suggested monitoring boat speed closely and having a speed limit to trigger reefing. It is easy to overlook a building breeze when bowling along downwind in a multihull, which is going faster and faster. ‘Keep your boat speed within safe limits you should not get into too much trouble,’ he said.

People often ask about anchoring a multihull, which is important as a multihull will spend a lot of time at anchor. Squeezing into a marina can be nigh on impossible, and expensive if you can get in. An essential piece of kit, which should be standard with a new boat, is a bridle that runs from either hull and keeps the anchor cable on the centreline. In many ways this is easier than anchoring a monohull as it prevents the ground tackle from fouling the hulls.

If you do get alongside a marina pontoon you will soon discover another modern cruising multihull issue: excessive freeboard. It’s worth investing in a portable ladder for those marina moments. Of more concern is MOB recovery. There are bathing platforms on both hulls of most new boats, but it’s not the place to be if a yacht is pitching in a heavy sea. So considerable thought needs to be applied to retrieving an MOB if the worst happens.

The recent and dramatic increase in numbers of multihulls going blue water cruising is certainly testament to their appealing ‘lifestyle’ attributes, but one must bear in mind that they are not a fix for all liveaboard cruising challenges. It’s just a different way of doing things. The elements remain the same and can inflict just as much punishment for the unwary on a multihull as they can on a monohull.

Enjoyed reading this?

A subscription to Yachting Monthly magazine costs around 40% less than the cover price .

Print and digital editions are available through Magazines Direct – where you can also find the latest deals .

YM is packed with information to help you get the most from your time on the water.

• Take your seamanship to the next level with tips, advice and skills from our experts
• Impartial in-depth reviews of the latest yachts and equipment
• Cruising guides to help you reach those dream destinations

Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram.

Catamaran vs. Monohull: We Changed, Should You?

There are two schools of thought when it comes to monohull versus catamaran. We have done extensive cruising and lived aboard two monohulls and four catamarans over the past 25+ years . We experienced the good and the bad for both single hull and multihulls first hand. Quite honestly, the pluses for catamarans far outweigh the minuses. There are multiple benefits of catamarans. They are faster, more stable and spacious, and have shallower drafts allowing safer anchorage closer to shore. Being on a stable platform with no heeling cuts down on crew fatigue and seasickness leaving the crew more alert and in control of the vessel. Even novice sailors feel more confident on catamarans.

When we built our monohull Royal Salute in the early 90s, catamarans were not established and were looked upon with extreme suspicion by most cruisers, including ourselves. “Safety and the capsize” issue were always the first things to come up against sailing catamarans. It is a fact that monohulls can get rolled in heavy seas but will right themselves because of the heavy lead keel, and while crew and vessel will be battered, the roll is survivable.

However a catamaran once capsized, will remain upside down (jokingly referring to this state of the catamaran as “reaching its most stable position when upside down”). The inability of a catamaran to self-right was and still is a major bone of contention. However, what is not often discussed is that a monohull has about a 5,000 pound keel of lead that is constantly trying to drag the boat to the bottom of the ocean versus a catamaran that has no ballast and is in most cases with modern catamarans, unsinkable.

So the options are to either sail the world on a boat that, if it springs a leak, will sink like a stone or a vessel that cannot self-right in the event of a capsize but will not sink no matter what. So from a practical point of view, here are our observations over the last 25+ years of living aboard, on the advantages and disadvantages of a catamaran.

ADVANTAGES OF A CATAMARAN

1. speed equals safety.

The speed of a catamaran makes it possible to outrun bad weather. While catamarans do not point as high into the wind as a monohull (or if it does, it makes more leeway or slides sideways), it is about 20% faster than a monohull. This means that even if you sail upwind at a slightly wider angle to the wind than a monohull and have to cover more distance, you will still arrive at your destination long before a monohull.

A modern performance catamaran with daggerboards and good quality sails will point as high as a similar sized monohull. It will point the same as a comparable monohull and sail much faster and therefore arrive at an upwind position much sooner than a the monohull. It is important to note that most of the production catamarans on the market are under-powered and are equipped with standard smaller sails. In lighter breezes many of these designs perform poorly unless fitted with bigger headsails, a Code Zero and a square-top mainsail.

While we believe that more comfortable and safer in rough weather , we have to concede that when the weather gets really bad (60 knots of wind or more) we would personally prefer to be on a monohull from the standpoint of surviving. I would say that a monohull is preferable for serious offshore single-handed sailing because you can more easily hove-to in a monohull. We have been in some extreme weather on a number of catamarans and never really felt that we were in danger, although it takes some nifty seamanship.

A monohull could capsize in extreme weather or even roll in a storm, but they generally come back upright. A catamaran on the other hand, will not right itself. But the cat will generally stay afloat, offering a good place to survive while you wait out the storm or until help comes along. Well-designed modern catamarans are very hard to capsize though.

Having said all that, most catamarans can do 200 to 250 miles a day and with modern technology allowing one to pull down weather at will, there is no good reason why you should get caught in extreme weather. A faster boat is a safer boat as it will in many cases be able to outrun bad weather. With good weather routing information a catamaran can avoid most serious weather and, at worst, place itself in the most favorable position to avoid the brunt of a storm.

2. A Catamaran is a Stable, Safe Platform Underway

Catamarans have no ballast in the keels like monohulls do and therefor it relies on beam and buoyancy for stability. Typically cruising catamarans will have a beam to length ratio of roughly 50%, although many designs nowadays exceed the 50% rule of thumb. So, a 45-ft long catamaran will be about 22-ft wide, providing a very stable platform when sailing. Unlike catamarans, monohulls cannot overcome the rolling and pitching with their narrow beam and the lead ballast for stability.

This rolling and pitching makes the deck on a monohull very unsafe whereas on walking around on the deck of a catamaran while underway is far easier since the boat is much more stable, and it doesn’t heel. This makes sail changes and reefing much easier and a lot safer for the crew. Without the rolling and pitching motion, the danger of falling overboard on a catamaran is considerably less than on a monohull.

3. Crew Fatigue Reduces on a Catamaran

Because a catamaran does not heel over like a monohull, it offers far more comfort underway because the motion is mostly fore and aft pitching and very little beam-to-beam rolling. On all points of sail, a catamaran tracks upright and significantly reduces crew fatigue and seasickness. Seasickness is usually caused by things like anxiety, fatigue, hunger and cold, which all add to a sense of disorientation. This leads the crew to making bad decisions and seamanship errors that could be fatal to the crew and vessel. The more stable platform of the catamaran will hugely keep those issues at bay, making the crew more alert and energized.

Every action and chore including cooking is much easier on a catamaran when underway. It is much more pleasant to be on the deck level looking out rather than being stuck “down below.” It is also much nicer to sleep on a boat that doesn’t heel. I remember nights at sea in our monohull when I was rolling around in my bunk unless I was properly wedge in a little corner. That is simply not the case on catamarans.

All these factors ensure that your crew will not expend unnecessary energy to simply try and stay upright, onboard and safe on a long passage. Your crew on a catamaran will be well rested and alert and will be able to function well if a stressful situation arises.

4. Comfort at Anchor

Catamarans provide a wide platform and therefore offer lovely spaces to relax at anchor without the rolling motion that monohulls have a tendency to do in a swell. During our 15 years of cruising on a monohull, we have often had to leave anchorages that we really were not finished exploring because of a rolly, uncomfortable anchorage. Big rollers or swells coming into an anchorage can make conditions in an anchorage very uncomfortable and unsafe.

We were anchored off Funchal on the island of Madeira in our monohull Royal Salute once, when we were forced to leave our anchorage. The rolling became so bad, we were rolling from gunnel to gunnel. The anchorage became untenable to remain anchored, forcing us to go out to sea in foul weather in the middle of the night. This is an extreme case but believe me, we have left many an idyllic anchorage because of a rolling swell into the anchorage. Catamarans, on the other hand, do not roll from like monohulls have a tendency to do and are far more comfortable at anchor.

5. Anchor Bridal Setup

Catamarans are fitted with a bridle, attached to both bows and down to the anchor chain, resulting in a very stable position at anchor. What we found with our monohull was that because the bow acts as a sail (because of the high freeboard), the boat tended to sail at anchor in high winds. It sailed in one direction until the chain snatched and tacked over and sailed in the other direction, feeling like it might dislodge the anchor altogether. The catamaran on the other hand sits at anchor a lot more stable and doesn’t sail around as much.

6. Ease of Boarding on a Catamaran

Thank goodness we were much younger and more agile during our monohull days. Royal Salute and most monohulls of her generation or older, have high free-boards, making it quite a feat to get onto the boat from the dinghy. It was one of the most challenging things to do because unlike the more modern monohulls that have a scoop at the back, we had to climb up on the side of the boat to get on and off. We, of course rigged steps, etc. but it was always a hassle compared to the ease of getting on and off a catamaran from a dingy or from the water.

7. Shallow Draft Equals Better Anchorages

Catamarans have significantly shallower drafts than monohulls, allowing for safer anchorages closer to shore. Most catamarans in the 40-ft to 50-ft range draw between 3-ft to 4.5-ft, so they can anchor in places that a monohulls can not even consider. In the shallow waters of the Bahamas for example, the catamarans have a big advantage. We often anchor our own catamaran just a few feet away from a beach. It definitely allows one to be able to explore areas where the water is shallow without the fear of running aground.

The shallow draft also allows for emergency repairs in shallow water and even doing the bottom job when the tide goes out as we have done in places like Mtwapa Creek in Kenya, East Africa. The catamaran easily rests on her keels on the sand without help making it a breeze to do the “annual haul out” even in remote locations.

8. Dinghy Davits & Dinghy Size

All catamarans have a set of davits that make it very easy to raise and lower the dingy. Our monohull and most cruising monohulls do not have an efficient or easily accessible set of davits. This makes raising and lowering the dingy an elaborate production. Catamarans on the other hand, has davits systems easily accessible and some even have platforms to rest the dinghy on.

The lack of beam and difficulty of lifting the dinghy also limits the size and type of dingy that one can reasonably carry on a monohull. As we all know, the dingy is your transport to and from shore and diving or fishing spots, so the bigger and faster the dingy, the better off you are. A catamaran can carry both a heavier and bigger dinghy which makes the popular center consul dinghy so much more possible.

9. Interior Space and Comfort on a Catamaran

We sailed 32,000 NM on our 45-ft monohull, happy as clams, not realizing that sailing does not have to be done lying on your ear 24/7 while on passage or sitting knee-to-knee in the cockpit at anchor with your two other guests at the dinner table! One can liken sitting in a monohull cockpit to sitting in an empty Jacuzzi, you are always nice and close to the other folks.

Now that we are on our fourth catamaran, there are a few things that have become more evident to us than the incredible space and comfort of a catamaran, not only at anchor but also underway. The cockpit and living space in general are huge compared to a monohull, making for very comfortable and spacious living conditions. It feels more like you are at home, rather than just on a camping trip.

Knowing that one spends at least 90% of one’s cruising life at anchor, it’s important to have good open living space, which most modern cats nowadays offer. A lot of cats have walk around beds, lots of storage, every modern appliance including washer/dryer, etc. However, one has to fight the urge to fill the space if you want to keep the cat light and fast.

Sailing with guests onboard for extended periods of time, in close quarters can become claustrophobic but on a catamaran people are spread out and separated. With guests sleeping in one hull and the owners in another, catamarans offer much more privacy and separation. Some cats even have privacy doors that will close off the entire hull and has a separate entrance onto the deck, which really separates you from the guests completely.

There is very little heeling on a catamaran, so there is no need for hand grips and safety harnesses inside the boat. There is nothing better (and safer) than being able to walk from the cockpit into the living room (saloon) on one level or one step down at most. In a monohull, when heeling at a severe angle, you would have to claw your way from the companionway steps down to the living area, while fighting to stay upright, significantly tapping your energy.

Unless you hit extreme conditions, everything stays put on a catamaran reducing the anxiety before doing passages of having to stow and secure everything. This very issue makes a lot of cruisers reluctant to weigh anchor and explore more often. It is just too much effort to pack away all your stuff once comfortable in an anchorage!

One thing you will notice is that the stove on catamarans are not gimbaled like it is on monohulls and this should tell the story in itself. The stability and comfort on a catamaran is far superior. Cooking is easy and safer. I often open a nice cold beer, put it down to do something and forget about it only to find a warm beer later in the same place I left it. This is not something that happens on a monohull.     

10. Redundancy on a Catamaran

Unlike monohulls, catamarans have a lot of critical redundancies. That of course means two hulls to clean and anti-foul, double the engine maintenance, etc. but having two of the critical equipment like engines for instance, outweighs the downside.

With two engines, if one fails you still have adequate propulsion to go anywhere. If by some fluke the second engine also fails, you have a full set of spares to fix at least one of them. Our friends once hit a sleeping whale off Tanzania, and when it dove, it hit the prop, bending it. They limped into the narrow channel on the one engine but at least they could make it to a safe harbor where we surveyed and repaired their damage.

We often only use one engine when motoring while making passage in order to conserve our fuel. The one engine is totally capable of moving the boat along at a good speed unless you are in heavy seas and you may need more power. Other than that we only use two engines to dock or maneuver the boat in close quarters.

Because there are two engines there are also two independent charging systems via the alternator on each engine. If one alternator goes out, there is still another complete charging system. There are two rudders and if one fails or falls off (as has happened to our friends on a monohull off Columbia, where they almost lost their boat) you have a second rudder that is completely capable of steering the boat by itself indefinitely. That holds true for several things on a catamaran!     

11. Maneuverability

The engines are spaced far apart on a catamaran and it makes maneuvering much easier and more precise than monohulls, unless the monohull has a bow thruster. We did not have a bow thruster (not many monohulls do) and had to rely on prop-walk and using prop wash on the rudder. A modern catamaran can do a 360 turn on her own axis. A monohull cannot do this and have a bigger turning circle. However, a monohull under sail is much more maneuverable and certainly will tack a lot faster than a catamaran. The ease in maneuverability under engine on a catamaran in close quarters specifically, is vastly superior comparatively.

12. Rigging

Because of the beam on a catamaran the spinnaker pole has become unnecessary equipment. Hallelujah, I say. That pole on our monohull was a pain the behind and I always hated having to use it. On a catamaran, one can fly an asymmetrical cruising chute or spinnaker, using the bows to tack the clew or run a guy through a block so it is very much simplified, easier and safer.We also sail wing-on-wing with twin headsails when we sail downwind. We use our furling jib and furling Code Zero. It is as easy as one, two, three.

DISADVANTAGES OF A CATAMARAN

1. bridgedeck slamming.

One advantage most monohulls do have when underway is that they don’t slam. Catamarans with a low bridgedeck clearance can experience significant slamming in confused seas sailing upwind. This slamming can be quite disconcerting when you first experience it as we did on a Shuttleworth 44 design, our first ever catamaran experience, 20+ years ago. At times, it felt as though the boat was falling apart. Of course the boat was fine but nevertheless, the stress on the crew from the constant noise and discomfort was significant.

Monohulls don’t have a bridgedeck which means no slamming and are therefore a bit more comfortable than l ow bridgedeck catamarans when beating into severe confused conditions or “washing machine” conditions as we call it. Modern catamarans mostly have better bridgedeck clearance and the slamming is significantly less. However, not all cats have a good clear tunnel under the bridgedeck. Some manufacturers build beds into the bridge deck in order to make more space in the chest of the catamaran where the slamming occurs. These protuberances into the bridgedeck tunnel will likely increase slamming. So be mindful of that when selecting a catamaran. We currently own a Bali 5.4 and the bridgedeck clearance on this boat is more than adequate and the tunnel is clear. We therefor experience very little slamming compared to our Prout 45 that we previously owned (picture of sister ship below) with a much lower bridgedeck.

We Explain Bridgedeck Clearance

In the pictures below, the Bali 5.4 has very good clearance from the water to the bridgedeck and has a nice clean tunnel versus the very low bridgedeck of the Sunreef 50. 

2. Sailing Downwind

Monohull spreaders are set at 90 degrees to the mast whereas a catamaran has to have backswept spreaders. The reason is that, on a monohull, there is a backstay and using this, plus the intermediates you can get a nice pre-bend in the mast (the pre-bend is to flatten out the main sail and allow for better performance).

On a catamaran with no back stay, you need to use the back swept spreaders and the diamonds to pre-bend the mast. The reason I point this out is because on a catamaran, if you want to broad reach or run, the mainsail cannot be let out all the way because the backswept spreader tips could punch holes in the fabric.

On a monohull, the spreaders are at 90 degrees so you can let the main and the boom out much further which is, of course, much more effective. This is one of the reasons it is better to broad reach and tack downwind on a catamaran.

Whether a monohull or multihull, sailing dead downwind doesn’t usually make great VMG. Therefor a regular cruising cat, much like a monohull, needs a lot of sail area and has to sail deep downwind if it is to achieve a decent speed made good (VMG). This video demonstrates how we achieve this by sailing wing-on-wing downwind.

It is more difficult to find a dock either as a transient or a permanent slip for a catamaran in general because of the wide beam. But this is changing fast and will soon not be too much of an issue. In the USA dockage is charged by the length of the boat in feet, so there is no disadvantage there but, in some places, (the Mediterranean for example), dockage is charged at length times one and a half because of the additional beam.

Since the catamaran is stable at anchor, we mostly anchor out. We have more privacy, a better breeze and usually a stunning view.We have a nice dinghy with a good outboard engine and is big and comfortable enough to get to shore fast and together with the modern conveniences like the generator, watermaker and washer/dryer, docking becomes a non-issue.

It is definitely more difficult to find a travel lift with enough beam for a catamaran for a haulout, while, for a monohull, there are absolutely no problems anywhere. The wide beam of cats also greatly limits the number of shipyards that can haul them out. Most catamarans over 40-ft must be hauled out with a 50-ton travel lift. This not only increases the cost of the haulout, but greatly limits the choice of the shipyards for repairs and maintenance. With limited choice, prices are high for shipyard services.

Catamarans do tend to have a lot more windage than monohulls. This can be an issue especially when maneuvering in close quarters with a strong wind. But I have found that, provided the engines are powerful enough for the size of catamaran, that twin engines negate this problem. Also, many modern large catamarans now have a bow thruster fitted. It is super easy to dock.

The cost of getting into a catamaran is much higher than that of monohulls. That could put a serious dent in your cruising kitty or require you to put your dream on hold a little longer. Pre-owned monohulls on the other hand are very cheap to buy comparatively, because the supply presently far outweighs the demand.

Catamarans are in high demand and they typically hold their value much better and longer and the trend is now heavily in favor of the catamaran market. When prospective buyers contact us for catamarans under $250,000 the choices are very limited and catamarans under $100,000 is near impossible to buy. In this case, your best bet is to go with a monohull unless you go with much older boats like the Prouts or the less expensive Geminis.

Our Own Catamarans & Monohulls

FYI: Royal Salute , a Bruce Roberts 45 monohull, was the first boat we owned and sailed approx. 30,000NM on. Mythral, a Seafarer 30, was our “toy boat” while we were waiting for our catamaran to be built. Even though this classic little monohull sailed around the world, it didn’t have much in modern conveniences like running water. Siyaya was an Island Spirit 40 catamaran that we sailed from Cape Town to Florida on and then taught live-aboard sailing classes for several years. Zuri I was a Prout 45, a beautifully crafted catamaran but by today’s standards is considered old technology. Our Lagoon 450 SporTop ( Zuri II ) is a fantastic live-aboard catamaran. We lived and taught aboard her for three years but sold her last year and we currently own a Bali 5.4 ( Zuri III or Z3 as we call her now). Read about our various boats .

CONCLUSION: CATAMARAN vs MONOHULL

We were dyed in the wool monohull sailors for 15+ years. We loved the pretty lines of monohulls, the sailing ability and what we believed at the time to be much safer vessels. However, now that we have been avid catamaran enthusiasts, we simply can never go back to monohulls. Catamarans have come of age and with modern technology have overcome most objections that sailors of old had against them. They are well designed and built, are safe, and we simply love that they sail fast and upright. There is not a whole lot to dislike about a catamaran when you live aboard. We have weighed all the pros and cons of catamarans and found that the pros far exceed the cons. We made the change to a catamaran and do not regret it one bit!

We hope that this article will clear things up for all the prospective catamaran owners out there.

Contact us if you have any questions regarding catamarans, Fractional Yacht Ownership or our Charter Management Programs .

Estelle Cockcroft

Join our community.

Get the latest on catamaran news, sailing events, buying and selling tips, community happenings, webinars & seminars, and much more!

4 thoughts on “Catamaran vs. Monohull: We Changed, Should You?”

I read that the engineering on the catamarans were improved over the years. Whats the oldest year would you recommend designwise?

Scott, my apologies for the late reply. We’ve been traveling in Africa. Anyway, catamarans have come a long way and improvements in technology is happening at lightning speed. I reckon that even the older model catamarans are good. It depends on what your needs are. If you want something a little better performance wise, I would go for something no older than 15 years.

After buying a catamaran what is the difference in expense of a catamaran vs a monohull. Many articles state that not only the initial cost of a catamaran is more it the operating cost as well.

Hi Todd, it is more expensive. The annual dockage and haul out as well as maintenance will be more expensive. You obviously have two engines to maintain and various other pieces of equipment to service in both hulls. While there is more equipment there is also more redundancy and of course you have the comfort factor. So, depending on your situation, it’s probably worth it.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recent Posts

First-Annual Virgin Islands Boating Exhibition (VIBE)

VIBE – It’s a Destination Boat Show! Join us May 10 – 12 at

BALI Catamarans Unveils The New Bali 5.8 Flagship

CATANA GROUP launches its 14th BALI CATAMARAN model, the BALI 5.8, for the brand’s

Love Stories At Sea…because it’s valentine’s day

Because it’s Valentine’s day, we wanted to celebrate all the couples that we helped

Your Go-To Resource for all your Catamaran Needs!

Check out our brochure to learn about all we have to offer and why

For more than 30 years, we have been a part of the catamaran community and created Catamaran Guru™ to encourage and educate all the aspiring sailing out there. We understand the dream of traveling the world by catamaran and created a one-stop-shop to make that dream a reality for you.

• Stephen & Estelle
• Testimonials

Get Started

• Yacht Sales
• Used Yachts
• Charter Management
• Boat as Business Programs
• Seminars & Events

• Cruising Compass Media Advertising & Rates
• Blue Water Sailing
• Multihulls Today
• Subscribe Today

• A Guide to 10 Great Blue Water Boats

Every veteran cruiser has his or her list of favorite cruising boats and, because cost is often an issue for many sailors, a lot of those boats will fall in the under-40-foot category. There are certainly many sweet designs under 40 feet that range from the venerable Crealock 37 to the futuristic Outremer 4x performance catamaran.

In the end, boats suitable for offshore sailing are sensible designs that will look after their crew in nasty weather, will survive an occasional grounding and will be capable of carrying enough stores for long passages and weeks off-the-beaten track.

And, it doesn’t matter if you choose a monohull or multihull; the right combinations of the above qualities can be found in both.

The gurus at Sail Universe decided to share their list of Best Boats Under 40 Feet recently and you can read the full story here.

You Might Also Like

• Cruisers Rescue Frantic Castaways off French Coast

• The 37th America’s Cup Defense Begins in August: Here are the Important Dates

Newport International Boat Show Acquired By South Florida Ventures

Read the Summer-Fall Edition of Blue Water Sailing

Read the fall 2023 edition of blue water sailing, recent posts.

• Introducing the New Dufour 44  Modern Family Cruiser

Please Visit Our Sponsor’s Webpages

• Media Advertising & Rates

Published by Blue Water Sailing Media, a division of Day Communications, Inc., Middletown, RI

Publisher & Editor: George Day

Blue Water Sailing Media publishes Blue Water Sailing magazine, Multihulls Today and other titles.

Cruising Compass Advertising Sales:

George Day, Newport, RI [email protected] 401-847-7612

• Survey of the Week

© 2014 Blue Water Media. All rights reserved. | Admin

Yachting World

• Digital Edition

Fast Bluewater Cruisers: the best new performance bluewater catamarans on the market 2018

• Toby Hodges
• August 20, 2018

Many monohull sailors who are thinking of converting to mulithulls for distance cruising seek a combination of the speed and feel of performance cruisers together with the space multihulls provide. To offer proper bluewater cruising ability yet not be too sluggish, a fast cruising cat or tri needs to be smartly designed with payload in mind and built relatively light. Here ’ s where the fast distance cruisers like Outremer, Catana, Swisscat, Seawind, Balance, Atlantic, Neel and Ocean Explorer help offer that potential sabbatical or retirement dream.

Just launched: Outremer 51

The original Outremer 51 launched in 2014 and proved popular, selling more than 50 models. It also garnered a number of European and US yacht of the year titles. But things can always improve, so the French catamaran builder has updated the design with the help of feedback from hundreds of owners. The improvements are superficial and substantial: the interior and exterior styling has been changed, but the boat’s performance has also been tweaked. Not only does this make the boat more fun, it is also “an important safety attribute”, says Outremer. With speeds in excess of 20 knots perfectly achievable, you could certainly outrun bad weather and potentially clock up 400 miles over 24 hours. This sleek-looking boat has on-trend reverse bows, curved coachroof and low-profile steering positions. The helms are slightly raised above the cockpit with a clear 360° view out over the coachroof. It may lack the real estate of a flybridge helm station, but it saves weight and allows the boom to be lower on the mast, all of which helps stability and performance. Control lines all lead back across the coachroof to winches within easy reach of the helmsman, except for the mainsheet, which runs along a track on the aft crossbeam behind the cockpit.

The saloon has comfortable seating and a table for six to eight, with a forward-looking navstation that is a good size. Accommodation is three or four cabins, depending on whether you opt for an owner’s-only hull. If you do, there’s a separate heads and shower, desk, seating and storage. Outremer makes much of the boat’s quietness, free from the grinding and cracking noises you hear as some cats flex. For liveaboards this could be a welcome feature.

First impressions

Outremer has done an impressive job of updating its most popular model, outside and in. I like the modern, muscular look of the sculpted-out topsides and dreadnought bows. Improved build techniques – partly acquired since its takeover of Gunboat – have also allowed the yard to save 600kg over the original model. The 51 has enough of a go-faster appeal for those converting from performance monohulls – the majority of Outremer’s clients, says sales manager Matthieu Rougevin-Baville – while at the same time retaining the seaworthy build and features for which the brand is known. It’s about keeping things simple, good-looking yet durable. For those with the budget, this is the ideal size of boat, in terms of speed bought by long waterline length, volume for accommodation and payload capacity (3 tonnes), for long-term, fast bluewater sailing.

At a glance…

LOA: 51ft 3in (15.65m) Beam: 24ft 4in (7.42m) Draught: 3ft 1in-7ft 7in (0.94m-2.31m) Displacement: 13.7 tonnes Price: from €735,000 Contact: Catamaran Outremer

Just launched: Ocean Explorer 60

Rubbing shoulders with Nautor’s Swan in Jakobstad, Finland, the new team behind this boat have a long track record in building low-impact yachts with high performance. And it’s not just a postcode they share with Swan – German Frers is also the designer of this yacht. The OE60 is the first in a range running to 78ft. There is carbon 
load-point reinforcing and an 
all-carbon rig for performance, with the further option of a carbon hull as well. Cutter rigged with a self-tacking jib and staysail, it has a long, sculpted bowsprit for launching downwind sails. Dual helm stations on each hull have long clear views ahead.

I wrote about this catamaran during its conception five years ago, but La Grande Motte was the first time I had seen one. Wow, talk about worth the wait… this is quite simply one of the most impressive luxury multihulls I have been aboard. Four main subcontractors to Nautor’s Swan and Baltic Yachts formed the company and the quality of their craftsmanship is, as you would expect, world class. It is the first production cat for Frers, yet the Argentinian designer has managed to maintain his reputation for alluring lines – this is a long, low and particularly elegant design. I like the helms right in the quarters, a more familiar position for monohull sailors, while the glass-based coachroof allows the helmsman a reasonable sight to the opposite bow. Step inside and it is the true panoramic view these vertical windows all combine to give that really appeals. The forward cockpit is a practical area for manning halyards or standing watch. I also like the clean, spreader-less rig and massive yet practical stowage areas. The skipper told me he had sailed a Gunboat 60 across the Pacific and that this OE60 matches its performance. A key is the C-foils, the most reliable appendage system he has used. This was the second OE60 to be built (the first has done four Atlantic and one Pacific crossing in four years) and is being used for charter. What I’d give for a week aboard this…

LOA: 60ft 7in (18.50m) Beam: 29ft 8in (9.07m) Draught: 2ft 6in-6ft 6in (0.85m-2.00m) Displacement: 18 tonnes Price: from €3.6m Contact: Frers

Just launched: Seawind 1600

The new flagship performance cruiser from the Australian brand made a welcome world debut at La Grande Motte in April. The Reichel Pugh design sits in a similar market to the Outremer 51 – a fast composite cruiser, aimed at couples going long-distance cruising. The first six 1600s sold off plans and Seawind, which owns Corsair, now builds in Vietnam. All boats are built using vinylester and Diam foam. The 1600 is Reichel Pugh’s first production multihull and has a practical air about it that sailors will appreciate. “It has been properly designed to sail fast when loaded,” says Seawind sales manager Jay Nolan. The helmsman can steer from under the solid bimini or can stand outboard, with a good view over the low coachroof. Retractable, captive daggerboards, along with foam-cored lifting rudders in cassettes, allow true shoal draught capability. The daggerboards are housed underdeck and controlled from the cockpit. The running rigging is, unusually, led under the coachroof and bridgedeck aft to a single central winch on the aft crossbeam. Reefing lines and the self-tacking jib sheet also lead to this protected, vertically mounted winch. The cockpit is smallish, linked to the interior via a huge sliding window.

I quickly took to this boat. The choice of performance monohull specialists to design a cruising cat is unusual, yet here the combination of Reichel Pugh’s reputation for winning lines and Seawind’s three decades of catamaran building experience has worked admirably. Sailors will appreciate the practical elements incorporated throughout. The design itself has particularly narrow hulls at waterline level, a low freeboard and coachroof, and the incorporation of a proper payload capacity into the light displacement. The use of captive boards and rudder cassettes allow for both sailing to windward and shoal cruising. The cassettes also create the option to replace 
or repair a blade easily and the low coachroof allows proper forward visibility 
from either helm. With the addition of larger portholes in the cabins, the 1600 gives an interesting fast cruising option for couples.

LOA: 51ft 8in (15.74m) Beam: 25ft 10in (7.90m) Draught: 8ft 6in-2ft 1in (2.6m-0.54m) Displacement: 13 tonnes Price: from €740,000 Contact: Seawind 

If you enjoyed this….

Yachting World is the foremost international magazine for bluewater cruisers and offshore sailors.  Every month we have practical features to help you plan and prepare to realise your sailing dreams. Build your knowledge month by month with a subscription delivered to your door – and at a discount to the cover price.  S ee our latest offers now.

Catamaran Vs Monohull

Last Updated by

Daniel Wade

August 30, 2022

Monohulls and traditional sailboats, once ubiquitous, are giving way to modern catamarans. But how do these designs differ?

Monohulls have a single hull, and catamarans have two hulls side-by-side. Catamarans are faster than monohulls of the same length and displacement, but monohulls are stronger and more spacious. Monohulls are also cheaper and easier to build than multi-hulls.

In this article, we’ll cover the differences between catamarans and monohulls, along with the benefits and drawbacks of each design. We’ll also cover the sailing characteristics of each and why catamarans so easily outrun equivalently-sized monohulls.

We sourced the information used in this article from trusted sailboat design resources, along with manufacturer specifications and boat market analysis.

Table of contents

‍ What is a Catamaran?

Catamarans are a kind of multi-hull sailboat with two hulls joined together. They are often short and wide, resembling a square or rectangle from above.

Catamarans are colloquially distinct from outriggers, which are double-hulled vessels with one large primary hull and a small outboard stabilizing hull.

Catamarans usually have hulls that mirror each other, both in size and arrangement. Sometimes, the interior layouts are mirrored, too—but this varies between designs and manufacturers. Catamaran hulls are narrower and taller than most monohull designs of equal lengths.

Catamarans have limited commercial and military utility, as these applications favor space and ease-of-construction over handling characteristics. That said, there are some commercial uses for catamaran designs—most commonly passenger and car ferries.

What is a Monohull Sailboat?

A monohull is probably what you traditionally think of as a boat. Monohulls are longer than they are wide. It features a single hull—it’s that simple. Sailing monohull designs have evolved over the centuries into many distinct types, usually distinguished by keel type.

Monohulls come in many shapes and sizes . For example, sailing monohulls designed for offshore use have long keels that sometimes extend much further below the waterline than the freeboard and cabin extend above it.

Monohull sailboats are also designed for other purposes, such as inland sailing and racing. These vessels have more contemporary characteristics, such as rounded shallow ‘canoe’ bottoms, V-bottoms, and fin keels.

Monohulls aren’t just sailboats. Virtually every cargo and container ship, warship, and many passenger ships are monohulls due to their strength, ease of construction, and high cargo capacity.

Are Monohull Sailboats More Common?

Monohulls are more common in every application, though multi-hulls are becoming more common for ferries. Monohulls have numerous benefits over multi-hulls, and these benefits only increase with scale.

Monohulls are easy to construct. They’re also cheap. Large monohull ships, such as container ships, can be built with very little material and effort. This is because the vast majority of the length of a monohull is just a box, with a bow and stern welded onto the end.

Sailboat construction is more intricate, but the costs are still lower. Plus, monohull designs are robust, and cabin space is plentiful. There’s a lot more study in the field of monohull design, which was the universal truth until somewhat recently.

But all in all, the reason why monohull sailboats are more common is that they work just fine. Most sailboat owners aren’t interested in breaking speed records or hosting dozens of people aboard their boats. As a result, a standard, simple, and easy-to-control monohull are more than sufficient.

Are Catamarans Faster than Monohulls?

Catamarans are most certainly faster than monohulls. This is almost always the case. Even the fastest production monohulls can’t hold a candle to the average cruising catamaran.

But why is this the case? Aren’t catamarans restricted by the same hydrodynamic forces as monohulls? As it turns out, they aren’t. This has to do with the unusual way hull waves impact speed.

Hull Speed Limitations

Monohull speed is limited by something called hull speed. Hull speed is determined using a formula that calculates the maximum speed a displacement hull can travel under normal power and conditions.

When a displacement hull moves through the water, it kicks up a set of waves at the bow and stern. These waves travel along the side of the vessel and create drag, which slows down the boat. Normally, the power of the wind can overcome this drag—but only to a point.

At a certain speed, the waves kicked up by the bow will sync with the waves kicked up at the stern and begin ‘working together’ against the boat. The speed at which this occurs is the hull speed, which is calculated from the length of the boat.

Hull speed limitations for monohulls aren’t universally true all the time. Some vessels exceed it, and some don’t—but the number is a useful estimate of the limitations of monohull designs. Modern monohulls with clever hull shapes can defeat hull speed calculations.

Do Hull Speed Limitations Apply to Catamarans?

Surprisingly no—hull speed calculations don’t work for catamarans. This is because, for one, the hulls are shaped differently. Alone, catamaran hulls wouldn’t float correctly. But together, they create different hydrodynamic effects and cancel out the effects of hull speed.

This means that catamarans can easily exceed the speeds of even the fastest monohulls of equal length—and sometimes beat them by a margin of 50% or more. It’s not unheard of for 40-foot catamarans to exceed 20 knots, whereas 40-foot monohulls rarely get past 10.

Are Catamarans More Comfortable than Monohulls?

Catamarans can be much more comfortable than equivalently-sized monohulls—up to a point. This is because catamarans engage in ‘wave piercing’ and have a wider and more stable footprint on the water.

Catamaran hulls, when properly designed, can slice through parts of a wave instead of riding over every peak and trough. This effectively reduces the height of the weight, which reduces the amount the boat rolls.

Additionally, the wide footprint of a catamaran allows some waves to simply pass right under it, keeping the boat level for longer durations. Catamarans also don’t heel under sail—instead, they plane slightly, raising the bows out of the water and reducing bumps.

Monohull Benefits

Monohulls are proven in all conditions. A well-designed displacement monohull sailboat can ride out the strongest storms, and monohull workboats can support enormous loads and move them efficiently. They can be fast, comfortable, and also easy to sail (even for beginners).

Monohulls are cheap to build and forgiving, as precision doesn’t have to be microscopic to get them to sail right. They’re robust and strong, featuring a naturally stress-resistant hull shape. They’re also easy to modify and aren’t required to meet as strict of dimensional ratios to operate.

With a monohull sailboat, you have a lot of interior room to work with. This means that monohulls are available in numerous cabin layouts and are just as easy to modify as they are to build. Monohulls often have a center of gravity at or below the waterline, which enhances stability at steep heel angles.

On the water, displacement monohulls can weather extreme conditions with ease. They lack the initial stability of multi-hulls, but they can recover from knockdowns on their own, and they’re very difficult to push past their rollover point.

Why do Catamarans Cost More than Monohulls?

Catamarans cost more than monohulls because they’re more expensive to build, more complex to engineer, and require more material. This isn’t always the case, but the design of catamarans requires much more careful engineering and strength-of-materials analysis than comparatively simple monohulls.

There are several critical structural points on catamarans that monohulls lack. In fact, the very shape of a monohull is physically strong—so it has inherent durability. Catamaran hulls must be joined in the middle, and the mast must have a strong point far from the inherently sturdy hulls.

This requires stronger materials and more care during design or construction. This is why catamarans remain a premium part of the sailboat market and why they still aren’t the most popular sailboats despite their numerous performance and comfort benefits.

Catamaran Cabin Layout

Catamaran cabins are split between the two hulls, and there’s usually a large pilothouse in the center. Pilothouse catamarans can be quite spacious, primarily due to the large space between the hulls.

The pilothouse is usually where kitchen and sitting areas are located, along with cockpit access and the controls of the sailboat. The mast is also located in this area.

Catamaran cabins sometimes mirror each other. For example, each hull may contain two identical bedroom/bathroom combos, while the center console area contains the kitchen and living spaces.

The two identical hulls sometimes make for unusual design decisions (such as small catamarans with four master bedrooms), but owners say this gives their passengers a much better experience than a monohull cabin.

Monohull Cabin Layout

Monohull cabins, with the exception of split-cabin sailboats with a center cockpit, have only one large interior space to work with. It’s usually much wider than catamarans of equal length.

Monohull cabins are usually accessible from the bow (via a flush deck hatch) and the stern via a traditional companionway. They run the span of the hull between the bow and the cockpit and sometimes include spare berths under the cockpit seats.

These spare berths are often used as convenient sea cabins, as they offer quick access to controls in case of an emergency. Catamarans often have convertible berths in the center console for the same reason.

Monohull cabins are traditional and include everything that catamaran cabins do—albeit with slightly less room overall. That said, individual spaces are often much wider, and facilities are more appropriate.

Related Articles

I've personally had thousands of questions about sailing and sailboats over the years. As I learn and experience sailing, and the community, I share the answers that work and make sense to me, here on Life of Sailing.

by this author

Learn About Sailboats

Most Recent

What Does "Sailing By The Lee" Mean?

October 3, 2023

The Best Sailing Schools And Programs: Reviews & Ratings

September 26, 2023

Important Legal Info

Lifeofsailing.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon. This site also participates in other affiliate programs and is compensated for referring traffic and business to these companies.

Similar Posts

Affordable Sailboats You Can Build at Home

September 13, 2023

Best Small Sailboat Ornaments

September 12, 2023

Discover the Magic of Hydrofoil Sailboats

December 11, 2023

Popular Posts

Best Liveaboard Catamaran Sailboats

December 28, 2023

Can a Novice Sail Around the World?

Elizabeth O'Malley

June 15, 2022

4 Best Electric Outboard Motors

How Long Did It Take The Vikings To Sail To England?

10 Best Sailboat Brands (And Why)

December 20, 2023

7 Best Places To Liveaboard A Sailboat

Get the best sailing content.

Top Rated Posts

Lifeofsailing.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon. This site also participates in other affiliate programs and is compensated for referring traffic and business to these companies. (866) 342-SAIL

© 2024 Life of Sailing Email: [email protected] Address: 11816 Inwood Rd #3024 Dallas, TX 75244 Disclaimer Privacy Policy

Catamaran vs. Monohull: Which Is Better?

Table of Contents

It used to be that sailors and powerboaters (blowboaters and stinkpotters, respectively) used to hold the loudest arguments about which was better– sailboats or powerboats. Today, the debate is centered around catamarans and monohulls— how many hulls are best? Is there a best?

Let’s look at what each boat offers— and continue to read for all Pro Boatsetter Tips .

Got a boat? Put it to work

The benefits of catamarans

Spacious for large crews, easier on your body, shallow drafts, safety system in case of emergencies.

Pro Boatsetter Tip: Did you know catamarans have seen a great surge in popularity over the last decade?

If you’ve got a large crew or plan on throwing parties aboard, you’ll probably benefit from the catamaran’s (also known as “cats”) roominess. Cats offer separation on deck with the aft cockpit , forward lounge or trampoline, and maybe even a flybridge .

Inside, cats have cabins and multiple heads for convenience. A cat of a given length (let’s say 40 feet) has 1.25 x the space of the same length monohull. In other words, it feels the same as a 50-foot monohull. It’s also usually laid out in a more user-friendly manner.

Cats have two hulls, making walking easier for kids, older folks, and pets! Because of its steadiness, you and your crew are less likely to be fatigued by the end of your boat trip. Maybe stay out longer to catch more fish.

Best of all, you’re less likely to feel seasickness because they don’t feel “on their ear” even when sailing in high winds and rough conditions. Not to mention, they’re much easier to sleep on.

Most sailing catamarans have a shallow draft perfect for skinny water cruising like the Chesapeake Bay and Florida. They can venture into areas previously off-limits to deep-draft monohull sailboats.

Most cats have double the systems, including bilge pumps, freshwater pumps, showers, heads, engines, etc. This means if one system fails, you’ve got a backup!

Twin screws also offer easier docking and increased maneuverability. It’s much easier to drive a large sailing cat than a single-engine monohull, especially in a cross-breeze and when docking, backing, or maneuvering in tight quarters.

The benefits of monohulls

• Performance
• Easy cruising
• Familiarity
• Availability & expense

Pro Boat Type Tip: Operating a monohull can be challenging! If this is your first time sailing on a monohull , make sure to rent with one of our pro captains.

Competitive performer

If you want to win a sailboat race, use a monohull. This boat’s design makes it a favorable contender even when weather conditions are working against you.

Let’s add a caveat here for cruising under power– cats tend to be more fuel efficient because they’re lighter and they’re not dragging a heavy keel through the water.

Easier motion

Monohull sailboats have their own groove. This motion is predictable and distinguishable by pro sailors. Cats, on the other hand, depend on the body of water’s condition state. Also, cats pound when going upwind into big seas if their bridge deck is pummeled by waves, while monohulls tend to slice through the waves.

Familiar handling

Monohulls have been around for centuries, and chances are that you learned to sail or powerboat on one, so their handling is more familiar. A cat’s dimensions may seem intimidating at first, especially if you are short-handed.

Availability & cost

Monohulls are more available, especially for rent. There are simply more of them. They’re also usually less expensive to rent and less expensive to moor in a marina.

The good news about catamarans and monohulls

There’s no right or wrong choice. It all depends on your budget but, above all, your boating lifestyle. So the better question is: what will you use your sailboat to do?

Party at hidden coves with your crew. Take the kids out for a fun sailing excursion. Sunset cruises with your partner. Enter a regatta; win! Rent it out for an extra income.

Learn more about boating types, gear, and fun water toys at Boating Resources .

Boatsetter is a unique boat-sharing platform that gives everyone — whether you own a boat or you’re just renting — the chance to experience life on the water. You can list a boat , book a boat , or make money as a captain .

List, rent, earn — Only at Boatsetter.

Zuzana Prochazka is an award-winning freelance journalist and photographer with regular contributions to more than a dozen sailing and powerboating magazines and online publications including Southern Boating, SEA, Latitudes & Attitudes and SAIL. She is SAIL magazines Charter Editor and the Executive Director of Boating Writers International. Zuzana serves as judge for SAIL’s Best Boats awards and for Europe’s Best of Boats in Berlin. 

A USCG 100 Ton Master, Zuzana founded and manages a flotilla charter organization called Zescapes that takes guests adventure sailing at destinations worldwide. 

Zuzana has lived in Europe, Africa and the United States and has traveled extensively in South America, the islands of the South Pacific and Mexico. 

Browse by experience

Explore articles

Yachts vs. Boats: What are the Differences?

2023 Black Friday Gift Guide for Boaters

How to Back Up a Boat Trailer in 7 Easy Steps

Crab Island - Destin, FL: A Complete Boating Guide

Catamaran Vs. Monohull: Which Is Better?

When considering sailboats for cruising or liveaboard purposes, two primary options often come to mind: catamarans vs. monohulls. We know, because we’ve been there!

Having sailed full-time for four years on a monohull before swapping to a catamaran with the impending arrival of baby, we really understand the whole catamaran vs. monohull debate, and it isn’t clear cut.

Both types of vessels have their own unique characteristics, advantages, and considerations. Understanding the differences between catamarans and monohulls can help individuals make an informed decision based on their specific needs and preferences.

Catamarans are known for their spaciousness, stability, and comfort. With their twin-hull design and wide beam, catamarans offer generous living spaces, expansive decks, and increased privacy with separate hulls.

The stability provided by the twin hulls creates a smoother ride, reduced rolling motion, and enhanced comfort in a variety of sea conditions. Catamarans also tend to have better maneuverability, fuel efficiency, and shallow draft capabilities.

On the other hand, monohulls are characterized by their sailing performance and versatility. Their single-hull design, deep keel, and ballast provide excellent upwind performance and responsiveness.

Monohulls offer a traditional sailing experience with the sensation of heeling and a closer connection to the water.

They are often more cost-effective in terms of initial purchase price and maintenance expenses. Monohulls also provide more options for docking in marinas with narrower slips.

Choosing between a catamaran and a monohull ultimately depends on individual preferences, intended use, and priorities.

Factors to consider include space requirements, stability preferences, sailing performance, budget, cruising plans, and personal comfort levels. Spending time on both types of boats and seeking advice from experienced sailors can help in making a well-informed decision.

In the following sections, we will delve deeper into various aspects of catamarans and monohulls, exploring their advantages and considerations, including stability, speed, cost, maintenance, maneuverability, and more.

By examining these factors, individuals can gain a comprehensive understanding of which type of sailboat may be more suitable for their specific needs and aspirations.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We also earn from other affiliate programs. This means we may receive a small commission on products purchased through our links at no extra cost to you.

Table of Contents

Which is better catamaran vs. monohull, the advantages of catamarans, the advantages of monohulls, the disadvantages of catamarans, the disadvantages of monohulls, are monohulls safer than catamarans, maintenance, ability to maneuver.

• Fuel Efficiency

Which Is Better In Rough Seas?

• Which makes a better liveaboard Sailboat?

There are lots of advantages to both catamarans and monohulls. Both can be excellent sailing or power vessels and suit various different needs. There is always a big debate among sailors about which is actually better and honestly, we don’t have the answers!

There are so many plus and minus points for each that it’s hard to come to a logical conclusion without knowing a certain sailor’s needs first.

What advantages does one have over the other? Let’s explore that now to help you decide which one is right for your individual needs.

Catamarans offer several advantages that make them popular choices for various marine applications.

One key advantage is their superior stability. The two parallel hulls provide a wide base, which distributes the weight evenly and reduces the likelihood of tipping or rolling. This stability is especially beneficial in rough seas, making catamarans a preferred choice for cruising, offshore sailing, and passenger transportation.

Another advantage of catamarans is their speed performance. The twin hulls reduce drag and increase buoyancy, allowing them to achieve higher speeds with less power.

Catamarans are often faster than monohull boats of similar size, making them popular for racing, chartering, and personal use. The speed advantage of catamarans can be particularly appealing for those who enjoy thrilling water sports or need to reach their destinations quickly.

Catamarans are also known for their fuel efficiency. The design of catamarans minimizes drag and weight, enabling them to achieve higher speeds with less power and fuel consumption compared to monohull boats.

This advantage becomes especially significant during long-distance cruising, where fuel costs can be substantial. The fuel efficiency of catamarans not only saves money but also contributes to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly boating experience.

In addition to stability, speed, and fuel efficiency, catamarans offer other advantages as well. Their wide beam provides ample deck space, offering more room for socializing, entertaining, and enjoying outdoor activities.

Catamarans often feature spacious cabins, making them comfortable for extended periods on the water, whether for leisurely cruising or living aboard. The dual hulls also provide increased buoyancy, allowing for shallower drafts and access to more secluded anchorages and cruising grounds.

Furthermore, catamarans generally have shallower keels compared to monohulls, which allows them to navigate in shallower waters and access remote areas that might be inaccessible to deeper-draft vessels . This versatility opens up a broader range of exploration possibilities for catamaran owners.

Overall, the advantages of catamarans, including stability, speed, fuel efficiency, spaciousness, and versatility, make them attractive options for a variety of boating enthusiasts.

Whether for leisurely cruising, racing, chartering, or living aboard, catamarans offer a unique combination of features that enhance the boating experience.

Monohull boats offer several advantages that make them popular among sailors.

One of the key advantages is their excellent seaworthiness, particularly in challenging conditions. The deep, V-shaped hulls of monohulls provide stability and a smoother ride through waves and choppy waters.

This design allows monohulls to cut through the water efficiently, making them well-suited for offshore sailing and bluewater cruising.

When out in huge waves during an unexpected storm I found it hard to imagine how a catamaran would cope compared to our heavy bluewater monohull that just plowed through the waves as though they were butter.

Another advantage of monohulls is their superior upwind performance. The single hull design allows them to tack more effectively and maintain a higher pointing ability, making them ideal for sailors who frequently navigate against the wind. This advantage is particularly important for racing sailors and those who enjoy exploring areas where upwind sailing is common.

Monohull boats are typically more maneuverable than catamarans. The single hull allows for sharper turns and greater agility, which can be advantageous in tight spaces, marinas, or when docking.

The ability to maneuver easily makes monohulls more versatile in navigating narrow channels, entering small harbors, or handling in confined areas.

Additionally, monohulls offer a wide availability and variety of models, sizes, and configurations. They have been the traditional and widely available choice in the boating industry for a long time. This abundance of options allows boaters to select a monohull that suits their specific preferences, needs, and budget.

Monohull boats also often have a lower initial cost compared to catamarans of similar size and quality. The construction and design of a monohull are typically simpler, resulting in a more affordable purchase price.

This cost advantage can be significant for individuals or families entering the boating world on a limited budget.

Finally, monohull boats are generally easier to dock and berth in standard marina slips. Their single hull design allows for straightforward docking procedures and fitting into narrower slips designed for monohulls.

This advantage simplifies the process for boaters who frequently visit marinas or require regular docking facilities.

It’s important to note that the choice between a monohull and a catamaran ultimately depends on individual preferences, intended use, and specific requirements. Both types of vessels have their unique advantages and considerations, and it’s crucial to carefully evaluate these factors when selecting a boat that best suits your needs.

Catamarans, despite their advantages, also have some disadvantages that should be taken into consideration.

One notable disadvantage is the cost. Catamarans are generally more expensive than comparable monohull boats. The construction, materials, and design complexity of catamarans contribute to their higher price tag.

Additionally, maintenance, docking fees, and insurance costs can be higher due to the larger size and wider beam of catamarans. We’re only just starting to find out just how much more they cost, and it isn’t insignificant!

Another disadvantage of catamarans is the limited availability of berthing options. The wider beam of catamarans can pose challenges when it comes to finding suitable berths in marinas. Many marina slips are designed to accommodate monohull boats and may not have sufficient space for catamarans.

This limitation may require catamaran owners to seek specialized marinas or rely more frequently on anchoring.

The wider beam of catamarans can make maneuvering more challenging, especially in tight spaces, narrow channels, or crowded marinas. The increased width may require additional care and skill when docking or navigating in confined areas. Catamarans may also require specialized docking arrangements or wider slips to accommodate their size.

In heavy weather conditions, catamarans may experience some performance limitations. While they generally provide excellent stability, their wider beam can make them more susceptible to windage and slamming.

The larger surface area exposed to the wind can result in more resistance and difficulties maintaining course in strong winds. Skillful handling and careful sail management are necessary to optimize performance in challenging weather conditions.

Additionally, some sailors enjoy the heeling sensation experienced on monohulls when sailing close to the wind. Catamarans, with their stable platform, lack this sensation since they do not heel to the same degree.

This absence of heeling can be seen as a disadvantage for sailors who enjoy the dynamic experience of monohull sailing.

Monohull boats also have their own unique set of disadvantages.

One of the main disadvantages is their stability compared to catamarans. Monohulls typically have a narrower beam and a single hull, which can make them less stable in certain conditions, particularly in rough seas.

This may result in more rolling and pitching motions, which can be uncomfortable for some passengers.

Another disadvantage of monohulls is their potential for heeling. When sailing close to the wind, monohulls have a tendency to heel or lean to one side. While this is a characteristic appreciated by many sailors, it can be a disadvantage for those who prefer a more stable and level sailing experience.

Monohulls also tend to have limitations when it comes to living space and interior layout. The narrow beam of monohulls can result in smaller cabins and reduced interior space compared to catamarans. This can be a consideration for individuals or families looking for more spacious accommodations on their boat.

Additionally, monohull boats may have more limited access to shallow or restricted areas due to their deeper draft. The single keel design of monohulls often requires a deeper depth requirement, which can limit their ability to explore certain cruising grounds or navigate shallow waterways.

Lastly, monohull boats generally have a lower initial stability when at rest compared to catamarans. This means that while they may have better stability underway, monohulls can feel less stable and more susceptible to rolling when anchored or at the dock.

This may require additional measures such as stabilizers or careful weight distribution to enhance stability at rest.

Comparing Catamarans Vs. Monohulls

We’ve compared some of the most important factors to consider when choosing a boat.

Ultimately, I don’t think either a monohull or a catamaran is superior to the other, but simply superior to the individual sailors’ needs. Before you decide which is right for you it’s a good idea to spend some time on both and work out what your priorities are when it comes to choosing a vessel.

Hopefully these comparisons will help a little!

The safety of monohulls vs. catamarans is a topic that can vary depending on several factors. It is important to note that both types of vessels have their own safety considerations, and the overall safety can depend on various factors, including design, construction, maintenance, and the skill of the captain and crew.

One aspect to consider is stability. Catamarans generally offer better initial stability due to their wide beam and twin hulls.

This stability can provide a more stable platform for passengers and crew, reducing the likelihood of rolling or heeling in rough seas. However, it’s important to note that catamarans can still capsize if pushed beyond their design limits or operated improperly.

Monohulls, on the other hand, have a narrower beam and a single hull, which can result in a higher tendency to heel or roll. However, monohulls are designed to recover from heeling due to their deep keel and ballast system.

They generally have a higher risk of capsizing compared to catamarans but will right themselves if this happens. This is a big thing to consider. Do you want a boat that is less likely to capsize but will be far more catastrophic if it does, or a boat that is designed to capsize and then right itself again?

Seaworthiness is another consideration. Both monohulls and catamarans can be designed and built to be seaworthy.

The quality of construction, design integrity, and adherence to safety standards play a significant role in the seaworthiness of any vessel. A well-maintained and properly equipped boat, regardless of its type, can handle a wide range of sea conditions safely.

Another aspect to evaluate is motion comfort. This can be subjective and may vary depending on individual preferences.

Some people may find the gentle rocking motion of a monohull more comfortable, while others may prefer the stability and reduced motion of a catamaran. It’s essential to consider personal comfort levels and any potential motion-related concerns when choosing a boat.

Lastly, it’s important to emphasize that the safety of any vessel depends on factors beyond the boat itself, such as the skill and experience of the captain and crew, adherence to safety protocols, and proper maintenance.

Regular inspections, safety equipment, and knowledge of emergency procedures are crucial for ensuring safety on any type of vessel.

In conclusion, the safety of monohulls versus catamarans is not a straightforward comparison. Both types of boats can be safe when used appropriately and in accordance with good seamanship practices.

It’s essential to consider the specific design characteristics, maintenance standards, and individual preferences when assessing the safety of a particular vessel.

When comparing the stability of catamarans vs. monohulls, it’s important to consider their inherent design characteristics.

Catamarans, with their twin hulls and wide beam, generally offer better initial stability than monohulls. The separation of the hulls provides a larger base and increased resistance to rolling.

This stability advantage is particularly noticeable at rest and in calm or moderate sea conditions. Catamarans tend to have a more level sailing experience and minimal heeling, which can be appealing to those who prefer a stable platform.

On the other hand, monohulls have a single hull and a narrower beam. This design makes them more prone to heeling, especially when sailing close to the wind or in stronger gusts.

However, monohulls are designed with deep keels and ballast systems to provide stability and the ability to recover from heeling. The combination of their keel and ballast works to counterbalance the forces acting on the sails, enhancing stability and minimizing excessive rolling.

It’s important to note that the stability of both catamarans and monohulls can be influenced by factors such as weight distribution, sail plan, and sea conditions. Improper loading or sail handling can affect the stability of any vessel, regardless of its design.

In terms of overall stability, catamarans often provide a more initial stable platform due to their wider beam and twin hulls. However, monohulls can offer a different kind of stability through their ability to recover from heeling and their long-established track record of safe offshore passages.

We would advise you to experience both types of boats firsthand, if possible, to get a better sense of their stability characteristics and determine which suits your needs and preferences best.

Speed: Catamarans vs. Monohulls

When it comes to speed, catamarans and monohulls have distinct characteristics and performance capabilities.

Catamarans are generally known for their high-speed potential. The design of a catamaran, with its two hulls separated by a wide beam, offers reduced drag and increased stability, allowing them to sail at higher speeds.

The wide beam also provides a larger surface area for sail plans, enabling catamarans to harness more wind power.

Due to their lightweight construction and reduced resistance in the water, catamarans can often achieve faster speeds, especially in reaching and downwind conditions.

Monohulls, on the other hand, have a single hull and a narrower beam. Their design may result in increased drag and slower speeds compared to catamarans, particularly in light wind conditions.

However, monohulls are well-suited for upwind sailing, thanks to their ability to heel and make use of the lift generated by their sails. This characteristic allows monohulls to excel in close-hauled or beating angles, which can be advantageous when sailing against the wind.

It’s important to note that the specific design, size, and rigging of a catamaran or a monohull can greatly influence their speed potential.

Different models, materials, and sailing configurations will have varying performance characteristics. Additionally, the skill of the captain and crew in optimizing sail trim and harnessing the wind’s power also plays a significant role in achieving maximum speed.

The cost of catamarans and monohulls can vary significantly based on several factors, including the size, age, brand, construction materials, and overall condition of the vessel.

It is essential to consider both the initial purchase price and the ongoing costs associated with owning and maintaining the boat.

Catamarans, in general, tend to be more expensive than monohulls of similar size and condition. The construction, materials, and design complexity of catamarans often contribute to their higher price tag.

The wider beam, twin hulls, and larger deck spaces of catamarans require more materials and labor during the construction process, leading to increased costs. Additionally, the popularity and demand for catamarans can also impact their pricing.

Maintenance costs can be higher for catamarans compared to monohulls. Catamarans typically have more deck space, more systems and equipment, and two hulls to maintain, which can result in increased maintenance and repair expenses.

Furthermore, the cost of haul-outs, bottom paint, and other services may be higher for catamarans due to their wider beam and potentially larger size.

Docking fees in marinas can also be higher for catamarans. Many marinas charge slip fees based on the length overall (LOA) and beam of the vessel. Catamarans, with their wider beam, may require larger slips, resulting in higher docking fees compared to monohulls.

However, it’s worth noting that docking fees can vary between marinas and regions, so it’s important to research and compare the costs in the specific areas where you plan to moor your boat.

Insurance costs for catamarans are typically higher than for monohulls. Insurance premiums are influenced by various factors such as the value of the boat, its size, cruising area, and the owner’s experience.

Catamarans often have higher values, and their wider beam may result in higher insurance premiums compared to monohulls. It is crucial to obtain insurance quotes specific to the vessel you are considering to understand the potential costs involved.

It’s important to keep in mind that these cost considerations are general observations, and individual circumstances may vary. Factors such as age, condition, location, and market trends can all influence the actual costs of catamarans and monohulls.

You can definitely buy an older catamaran in bad condition for less than a newer, ready to sail monohull as we did! Or opt for a small catamaran for cruising instead of a larger monohull.

Conducting thorough research, consulting with experts, and obtaining specific quotes and estimates are advisable when evaluating the cost implications of owning either type of vessel.

In conclusion, while catamarans generally tend to be more expensive to purchase, maintain, and insure compared to monohulls, the actual costs can vary significantly based on individual factors.

It’s crucial to assess your budget, intended use, and long-term financial considerations when deciding between a catamaran vs. a monohull.

The maintenance requirements for catamarans and monohulls can vary based on factors such as size, age, construction materials, and the specific equipment and systems onboard.

Catamarans typically have more deck space and systems to maintain compared to monohulls. With two hulls, there are generally more areas to clean, inspect, and maintain.

This includes the hulls, decks, and various components such as trampolines, rigging, and bridge decks. The larger deck areas and additional systems, such as two engines, may require more time and effort for cleaning, maintenance, and routine checks.

The hulls of catamarans often require regular cleaning and antifouling to prevent the growth of marine organisms and maintain optimal performance. Due to their wider beam, catamarans may have a larger underwater surface area, which can result in increased costs for haul-outs, bottom paint, and related services.

Monohulls typically have a single hull and a more streamlined shape, which may make certain maintenance tasks more straightforward. The single-hull design can simplify tasks like hull cleaning, inspection, and maintenance.

However, monohulls may have deeper keels and other appendages that require attention and occasional maintenance, such as keel bolts, rudders, and through-hull fittings.

Both catamarans and monohulls have various onboard systems and equipment that require regular maintenance, such as engines, generators, plumbing, electrical systems, and navigation equipment.

The maintenance requirements for these systems can be similar regardless of the hull type, as they depend on the quality of the equipment, usage patterns, and adherence to recommended maintenance schedules. On a catamaran though, remember you’ll have double of most things!

It’s important to note that maintenance needs can also be influenced by the quality of construction, materials used, and overall condition of the vessel. A well-maintained and properly cared-for boat, whether a catamaran or a monohull, is likely to require less maintenance and be more reliable in the long run.

Regular inspections, maintenance checklists, and adherence to manufacturer guidelines and recommendations are crucial for ensuring the safety and longevity of any vessel.

In conclusion, while catamarans may have more deck space and systems to maintain, the specific maintenance requirements can vary depending on individual factors. Regular cleaning, inspection, and upkeep of hulls, systems, and equipment are essential for both catamarans and monohulls to ensure their safe and reliable operation.

When comparing the ability to maneuver, catamarans and monohulls have some differences based on their design characteristics.

Catamarans generally have better maneuverability in certain aspects. Due to their twin-hull design, catamarans typically have a smaller turning radius, allowing them to make tighter turns compared to monohulls. This can be advantageous when navigating in tight spaces, such as marinas or narrow channels.

The wide beam of catamarans provides inherent stability, which can contribute to a more predictable and controlled maneuvering experience. They have a reduced tendency to heel, allowing them to maintain a more level sailing platform while executing maneuvers. This stability can be particularly beneficial when sailing in challenging conditions or when performing quick maneuvers.

Monohulls, on the other hand, have different maneuvering characteristics. Their single-hull design allows them to tack more efficiently when sailing upwind, taking advantage of the lift generated by their sails. Monohulls can often point closer to the wind compared to catamarans, making them more effective in beating angles.

Monohulls with deep keels and rudders may have better tracking ability and may be more responsive to helm inputs compared to catamarans. This can make monohulls more agile and responsive during maneuvers such as jibing or changing course.

However, it’s important to note that the maneuverability of any boat depends not only on its design but also on factors such as size, weight, sail plan (how many sailboat masts ), rigging, and the skill of the captain and crew. The performance and maneuverability of a vessel can be influenced by the specific model, its handling characteristics, and the experience of those operating it.

Ultimately, the ability to maneuver a boat effectively depends on the individual’s familiarity with the vessel, understanding of sailing principles, and proficiency in handling various sailing maneuvers.

Practice, training, and experience are key factors in mastering the maneuvering capabilities of any sailboat, whether it’s a catamaran or a monohull.

It’s worth noting that modern catamarans and monohulls often incorporate advanced sail handling systems, such as electric winches and bow thrusters, which can enhance maneuverability and make handling the boat easier in certain situations.

In conclusion, catamarans and monohulls have their own maneuvering characteristics based on their design features. Catamarans generally offer tighter turning radius and better stability, while monohulls may excel in upwind sailing and responsiveness.

However, individual experience, skill, and familiarity with the vessel play significant roles in maximizing maneuverability for either type of boat. I’m terrified of docking the new catamaran considering how much bigger it is, but with practice you can get used to any vessel.

Fuel Efficiency: Catamarans vs. Monohulls

When comparing the fuel efficiency of catamarans vs. monohulls, there are several factors to consider that can impact their respective fuel consumption.

Catamarans, with their wide beam and twin-hull design, generally offer better fuel efficiency compared to monohulls of similar size.

The reduced hull drag and increased stability of catamarans contribute to improved fuel economy. The efficient hull shape and reduced resistance in the water allow catamarans to glide through the water more easily, requiring less power to maintain a given speed.

Monohulls, with their single hull and narrower beam, typically have higher hull drag and may require more power to maintain similar speeds compared to catamarans.

However, modern monohull designs incorporate advancements in hydrodynamics and sail technology, which can help optimize fuel efficiency. Efficient hull shapes, bulbous bows, and streamlined appendages can all contribute to improved fuel economy in monohulls.

The specific speed and conditions of sailing can significantly impact fuel efficiency for both catamarans and monohulls.

Generally, sailing at lower speeds or utilizing downwind conditions can improve fuel efficiency, as it reduces resistance and minimizes the need for engine power. On the other hand, pushing a vessel to its maximum speed or sailing against strong headwinds can increase fuel consumption.

Other factors that can influence fuel efficiency include the size and weight of the vessel, the engine type and power, the sail plan, and the cruising habits of the captain and crew.

Efficient propulsion systems, such as modern diesel engines or hybrid electric systems, can further enhance fuel efficiency for both catamarans and monohulls.

It’s important to note that the fuel efficiency of any boat is also influenced by factors such as maintenance, proper hull cleaning, and overall vessel condition. Fouled hulls, dirty propellers, and inefficient systems can increase drag and reduce fuel efficiency.

Ultimately, the fuel efficiency of a catamaran or a monohull can vary depending on multiple factors, and it’s challenging to make broad generalizations. When considering the fuel consumption of a particular vessel, it’s essential to evaluate the specific design, size, engine setup, and cruising habits to obtain a more accurate understanding of its fuel efficiency capabilities.

In conclusion, catamarans generally offer better fuel efficiency compared to monohulls of similar size, thanks to their reduced hull drag and increased stability.

However, advancements in monohull design and technology have narrowed the gap, and modern monohulls can also achieve respectable fuel efficiency. The specific vessel, its design, engine setup, and cruising habits will ultimately determine the fuel efficiency of a catamaran or a monohull.

When it comes to determining which is better in rough seas, whether a catamaran vs. a monohull, it depends on various factors and personal preferences.

Both types of vessels have their own strengths and considerations in rough conditions and it took us a lot of research to work out that really there isn’t a ‘better vessel’, just different preferences.

Catamarans, with their wide beam and twin-hull design, generally offer better stability and reduced rolling motion in rough seas. The separation of the hulls provides a larger base and increased resistance to rolling, resulting in a more stable platform.

This can contribute to a smoother and more comfortable ride, particularly in waves or when the sea state is challenging.

The inherent stability of catamarans can also be advantageous when sailing in rough seas, as it reduces the tendency to heel excessively and maintains a more level deck. This can enhance safety and comfort for crew and passengers, as well as provide better accessibility to onboard amenities and reduce the risk of items shifting or falling.

Adam and I have always found that the constant rolling on our monohull caused lots of opportunities for accidents, and even sometimes prevented us from checking things on deck because we felt too unsafe to move around up there in heavy seas.

On the other hand, monohulls are known for their ability to handle rough seas and heavy weather conditions effectively.

Their single hull design, with a deep keel and ballast, allows them to slice through waves and provide a more predictable motion in challenging sea states. The weight and ballasting of monohulls contribute to their ability to maintain course stability and resist being pushed around by waves and wind.

Monohulls also have a reputation for their ability to “self-right” in extreme situations, where their inherent stability helps them recover from a knockdown or capsize. This characteristic can provide added safety and reassurance in rough seas.

It’s worth noting that the specific design, size, construction, and condition of a vessel can significantly influence its performance in rough seas.

Heavy weather sailing often requires proper preparation, including reefing sails, securing loose items, and ensuring the boat is seaworthy and equipped with appropriate safety gear.

Additionally, the skill and experience of the captain and crew play a crucial role in handling a boat in rough seas. Understanding the vessel’s limitations, practicing good seamanship, and making sound decisions based on prevailing conditions are vital regardless of the type of boat.

Which Makes A Better Liveaboard Sailboat?

Determining which sailboat makes a better liveaboard depends on individual preferences, lifestyle, and specific needs. Both catamarans and monohulls can offer advantages and considerations for liveaboard sailing.

Catamarans are often preferred as liveaboard sailboats for several reasons:

• Space and Comfort: Catamarans generally offer more interior space and living area compared to monohulls of similar size. The wide beam allows for spacious cabins, larger saloons, and generous deck space , providing a more open and comfortable living environment.
• Stability: Catamarans’ twin-hull design provides inherent stability, minimizing rocking and rolling motion. This stability can contribute to a more comfortable living experience, especially for those prone to seasickness or families with young children.
• Privacy: Catamarans often have separate hulls with cabins located in each hull. This layout can provide increased privacy, making them suitable for couples, families, or individuals who value their own space.
• Accessibility: The level decks of catamarans make it easier to move around the boat, especially for those with mobility challenges or families with young children. The absence of heeling allows for a more stable and safer environment while underway or at anchor.

Monohulls also offer advantages for liveaboard sailing:

• Sailing Performance: Monohulls are known for their sailing performance, particularly upwind. They typically have better windward ability and can handle a wider range of sailing conditions. If sailing and performance are priorities, a monohull may be preferred.
• Cost: Monohulls generally have a lower purchase price and maintenance costs compared to catamarans of similar size and condition. This can be advantageous for those on a tighter budget or looking to minimize expenses.
• Traditional Experience: Many sailors appreciate the traditional experience of sailing a monohull. The heeling sensation and close connection to the water can provide a sense of adventure and immersion in the sailing lifestyle. We have to say, we loved the romance that living on board our monohull gave.
• Docking and Marinas: Monohulls generally require narrower slips, making them more suitable for certain marinas and docking situations where space may be limited. This can provide more flexibility in choosing berthing options (and cheaper too!)

Ultimately, the choice between a catamaran and a monohull as a liveaboard sailboat depends on individual preferences for space, comfort, stability, performance, budget, and intended use. Check out the best shallow draft liveaboard sailboats .

We would recommended you spend time on both types of boats, perhaps through charters or boat shows, to experience firsthand their layout, handling, and suitability for living aboard.

If you can’t do this, then we would suggest you buy a cheap boat to start with and spend six months living aboard to work out what you really want and need from a liveaboard boat.

Consulting with experienced liveaboard sailors can also provide valuable insights and perspectives based on their own experiences, and watching sailing YouTube channels can also help you form an idea of what you might need.

Conclusion: Catamaran Vs. Monohull

In conclusion, the choice between a catamaran and a monohull depends on various factors and personal preferences. Both types of sailboats offer distinct advantages and considerations.

Catamarans excel in areas such as spaciousness, stability, and comfort. Their wide beam provides ample living space, and their twin-hull design offers inherent stability, making them popular choices for liveaboard sailors seeking a comfortable and roomy living environment.

Catamarans also have advantages in terms of maneuverability, fuel efficiency, and shallow draft capabilities.

Monohulls, on the other hand, are known for their sailing performance, particularly upwind. They offer a traditional sailing experience with a heeling sensation and a closer connection to the water.

Monohulls generally have lower purchase and maintenance costs compared to catamarans, making them more budget-friendly options. They can also be advantageous in certain docking situations and marinas that have narrower slips.

It is important to consider factors such as space requirements, stability preferences, sailing performance, budget, and specific cruising plans. It is advisable to spend time on both types of boats to gain firsthand experience and insights into their handling, comfort, and suitability for specific needs.

Consulting with experienced sailors, attending boat shows, and seeking professional advice can also provide valuable guidance in making an informed decision.

Ultimately, selecting the right sailboat, whether a catamaran or a monohull, is about finding the vessel that aligns with your preferences, lifestyle, and goals for the sailing experience.

Similar Posts

Making Your Sailboat Feel Like Home: Must Have Home Comforts

Storm Sails: The Ultimate Guide

How to Make Money While Living on a Sailboat

Sailing Close To The Wind: How And Why You Should

How To Start A Life At Sea

Can You Live On A Boat On Land And What’s It Really Like?

• Search Search Hi! We’re Emily, Adam and Tiny Cat, liveaboard sailors travelling the world on our 38ft sailboat and writing about it as we go. We hope we can inspire you to live the life you’ve always dreamed, whether that’s exploring the world or living a more simple way of life in a tiny home. Find out more. Patreon
• Privacy Policy

Catamaran VS Monohull Sailing – Which Is Best For You?

When it comes to choosing the right boat for your sailing adventures, the debate between catamarans and monohulls is a hot topic. Many novice and experienced sailors face the challenge of deciding which type of boat best suits their needs, preferences, and sailing goals.

Each of these vessels has its unique characteristics, and your choice will ultimately depend on factors such as the intended use, the areas you plan to sail, budget constraints, and your personal preferences.

In this article, you’ll find all you need to know about catamaran vs monohull sailing. So, let’s dive into it right now and see the key differences between these two popular types of watercraft.

Post updated: 25.10.23

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

• Understand the differences in design and performance between catamarans and monohulls.
• Consider factors like comfort, safety, and cost when choosing a boat.
• Gain insights into the pros and cons of each type of vessel to make an informed decision.

Design and Structure

Hull comparison.

When choosing between a catamaran and a monohull, one of the main differences lies in their hull structures. A  catamaran  consists of two parallel hulls connected by a beam, offering more stability and a shallower draft.

A  monohull  has a single hull and relies on a deep keel for stability. Monohulls often give the feeling of sailing closer to the water and provide the traditional sailing experience many enthusiasts enjoy.

Deck and Cabin

In terms of living quarters, catamarans offer larger, more open deck spaces and cabins than monohulls. This allows for a more comfortable living experience, with roomy kitchens and dining areas.

On a monohull , the living space can feel more confined, but some sailors appreciate the cozy atmosphere and the challenge of maximizing every inch of space.

Beam and Ballast

The beam refers to the width of the boat, and in the case of a catamaran , it is typically wider than a comparable monohull, as it stretches across both hulls. The increased beam improves stability, making catamarans less likely to rock or roll in waves when navigating in good conditions.

Monohulls, on the other hand, have a narrower beam and use ballast (typically in the form of a heavy keel) to assist in maintaining balance. This allows monohulls to lean or “heel” more while underway, providing a unique sailing experience for those on board.

Helm and Rudders

Both catamarans and monohulls have helms and rudders to control the boat’s direction and maneuverability. The key difference lies in the positioning and number of these components.

On a catamaran , there are typically two rudders, one behind each hull, providing more responsive steering and faster turning.

Monohulls have a single rudder, which might make steering more challenging in strong winds or high seas.

Performance

Speed and efficiency.

When comparing catamarans and monohulls, one of the first things that comes to mind is their speed and efficiency.

Catamarans are generally faster than monohulls of the same length and displacement.

This is primarily due to their lighter weight and slim hulls, which offer less water resistance and drag.

In fact, a catamaran can often sail at half the speed of wind, which is about 30% faster than a monohull. However, this also depends on factors like sail configuration, wind conditions, and sea state.

Handling and Maneuverability

Handling characteristics differ significantly between catamarans and monohulls. Generally, monohulls are more responsive to trim adjustments and wind pressure, providing a more engaging sailing experience for the sailor.

On the other hand, catamarans are less maneuverable under sail since they lack the deep keel of a monohull, which is essential to track and coast.

Nonetheless, catamarans excel in maneuvering when under power, thanks to their twin-engine configuration. They can pivot the boat into position more easily, making docking a breeze.

Monohulls rely on prop walk and reverse to position themselves, which can be challenging for some sailors.

Upwind Sailing

Sailing upwind is an essential aspect of any sailing adventure. Here, monohulls have the edge, as they can sail closer to the wind. This means that when you’re racing or trying to reach an upwind destination, a monohull might get you there faster.

Catamarans, on the other hand, struggle to tack upwind as efficiently due to their wider hull separation and lower resistance.

Water Resistance and Drag

Water resistance and drag play a crucial role in a sailboat’s performance. Catamarans have slender hulls with minimal wetted surface area, which reduces drag and allows them to cut through the water more efficiently.

This design contributes to their speed advantage over monohulls . On the contrary, monohulls have a larger wetted surface and a deeper draft, which increases water resistance and slows them down in comparison.

Both catamarans and monohulls have their unique strengths and weaknesses in terms of performance. While catamarans are generally faster and offer better maneuverability under power, monohulls excel in upwind sailing and provide a more engaging sailing experience. 

Comfort and Space

Spaciousness and comfort.

Regarding comfort and space, catamarans have a clear advantage over monohulls. Thanks to their wide beam, catamarans offer more spacious accommodations, especially in the main saloon and cockpit areas.

The twin-hulled design provides greater stability, resulting in a smoother sailing experience with less heeling and rocking.

This makes catamarans ideal for those who prioritize comfort and want plenty of room to move around during their sailing adventures.

Kitchen and Dining Experience

A key difference in the kitchen and dining experience between catamarans and monohulls lies in the amount of space and layout.

Catamarans typically feature roomier galleys with ample counter space for meal preparation, making it easier for everyone to lend a hand in the kitchen.

The dining area in catamarans is often designed as an extension of the cockpit, allowing for seamless indoor-outdoor socializing and easy access to both the galley and the deck.

In contrast, monohull sailboats have smaller galleys, often in a U-shape or along one side of the hull. The dining area might be more confined, usually within the main salon. While it may be cozy, it lacks the open and airy feel of a catamaran’s dining space.

Privacy and Living Quarters

Another aspect to consider is the privacy and living quarters in both types of sailboats.

Catamarans usually have separate hulls for the living accommodations, which can provide greater privacy and personal space for guests or crew members as the cabins tend to be physically separated from the common areas.

Additionally, because the cabins are situated in the hulls, they are less affected by noise or disturbance from the main salon and cockpit.

Monohull sailboats, on the other hand, usually have more compact living quarters located within the same hull. Privacy may be slightly compromised due to the closeness of the cabins to the common areas.

That said, monohulls can still provide adequate living space and privacy, depending on the layout and size of the sailboat.

Safety and Stability

When comparing catamarans and monohulls, safety and stability are important factors to consider. In this section, I’ll explain the differences between the two boat types regarding capsize and buoyancy, seasickness, motion, dealing with waves and bad weather, and docking and anchoring.

Capsize and Buoyancy

Catamarans are known for their stability due to their two-hull design, which increases their resistance to capsizing.

Conversely, Monohulls can roll over more easily but can right themselves due to their heavy, lead-loaded keels. However, catamarans have natural buoyancy and can remain afloat even if they are holed, while a monohull may sink if it takes on too much water.

Seasickness and Motion

Seasickness can be a major concern for boaters, and the motion of a catamaran is generally more stable and comfortable than that of a monohull.

Catamarans are less susceptible to roll, which can reduce the chances of seasickness for those onboard.

Monohulls , however, tend to pitch more in rough seas, which can lead to a more uncomfortable ride for passengers.

Dealing with Waves and Bad Weather

While catamarans are known for their speed advantage over monohulls, heavier cruising catamarans may not be as fast if they have smaller rig sizes for ease of handling.

In bad weather, a catamaran’s speed can help outrun storms, while monohulls rely more on their stability in rough waters.

Waves in an anchorage that induce violent roll in a monohull may, however, only cause a catamaran to bounce or bob.

Docking and Anchor

When it comes to docking and anchoring, there are differences between catamarans and monohulls.

Catamarans don’t coast well primarily because they don’t have a deep keel to track. They require a different approach to docking, utilizing engines to pivot the boat into position instead of relying on coasting and prop walk.

Monohulls typically need more depth when anchoring due to their keels, while catamarans benefit from their shallow drafts, allowing them to access shallower areas and anchor closer to shore.

Cost and Maintenance

When considering catamarans and monohulls, it’s important to take into account the cost and maintenance of each type of vessel. So, let’s explore the differences in maintenance and equipment, fuel consumption, and demand and resale value between the two.

Maintenance and Equipment

Generally, catamarans are more expensive to buy and maintain than monohulls. This is mostly due to their double-hull design, which requires extra maintenance and equipment costs.

On average, catamarans are 19-66% more expensive when new and have about 60% higher annual fees.

Although monohulls ‘ maintenance and repair costs are often lower, both boat types require regular upkeep to stay in good shape.

Some key maintenance differences between catamarans and monohulls include:

• Hull and rigging maintenance:  Catamarans have two hulls, which can lead to double the maintenance costs for bottom painting and cleaning. However, their typically lighter and simpler rigging system can result in lower maintenance costs than monohulls.
• Engine maintenance:  Catamarans usually have two engines, one in each hull, increasing overall maintenance costs. Monohulls generally have one engine, which can result in lower maintenance costs over time.

Fuel Consumption

When it comes to fuel consumption, catamarans tend to be more fuel-efficient than monohulls, especially at slower speeds. This is due to their hydrodynamic design, lightweight materials, and relatively less water resistance.

Although monohulls may consume more fuel, they often have a smaller fuel tank, which can result in lower overall fuel costs.

Demand and Resale Value

When purchasing a vessel, it’s important to consider the demand and resale value of both catamarans and monohulls.

Catamarans hold their value better due to their growing popularity and scarcity in the used boat market. This means that if you decide to sell your catamaran, you are likely to get a higher percentage of your investment back.

Monohulls, on the other hand, are more common on the used boat market, resulting in lower resale values. However, they typically have a lower initial purchase price, which may be more attractive for those on a budget.

Pros and Cons of Catamarans and Monohulls

Now, let’s explore the advantages and disadvantages of both catamarans and monohulls to help you decide when choosing the right boat for your needs. Let’s dive right into it!

Advantages of Catamarans

One of the main advantages of catamarans is their  comfort . They’re more stable and less prone to heeling, making it less likely for passengers to get seasick.

Catamarans are also more  spacious  due to their dual-hull design, providing ample living space above the waterline with bright and airy saloons. This makes them perfect for sailing with family or friends.

When it comes to  speed , catamarans generally perform better than monohulls. They usually sail faster and are more maneuverable in tight spaces due to their shallower draft, allowing for safer anchorages closer to shore.

Most catamarans in the 40-ft to 50-ft range draw between 3 ft to 4.5 ft, so they can access places that monohulls can’t even consider.

Disadvantages of Catamarans

Unfortunately, catamarans do have some downsides. One of the main disadvantages is their larger  windage .

The increased surface area can make them more difficult to handle in strong winds.

Additionally, their  maintenance  can often be more specialized and expensive due to the unique design features.

Advantages of Monohulls

Monohull boats have their own set of advantages. They provide a more classic  aesthetic  that many sailors find appealing.

When it comes to sailing performance, monohull boats  heel  naturally, which can give more direct  feedback  to the sailor and make for a more exhilarating experience.

In terms of speed, modern monohulls can sometimes exceed catamarans, particularly downwind and in choppy seas. Some can reach speeds of 10 knots or more.

Disadvantages of Monohulls

On the flip side, monohull boats often have less living space, and most spaces are below the waterline, making them feel more cramped and darker compared to catamarans. The heeling experience is a double-edged sword, as some passengers might enjoy it while others may feel more prone to seasickness.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: which is safer in rough seas: a catamaran or a monohull.

When it comes to rough seas, both catamarans and monohulls have their safety advantages. Catamarans are known for their stability on the sea, and their speed can make it possible to outrun bad weather.

However, monohulls are considered to be stronger and may provide more space for emergency equipment and supplies. Safety ultimately depends on your skills as a sailor, the boat’s design, and the specific conditions you encounter.

Q: Can both catamarans and monohulls be used for offshore fishing?

Yes, both catamarans and monohulls can be used for offshore fishing. Catamarans are famous for their stability and ample deck space, which can provide a more comfortable fishing experience.

Monohulls, on the other hand, often have a deeper draft, allowing them to access deeper waters and a wider range of fishing spots. Ultimately, the choice comes down to your personal preferences and the type of fishing you plan to do.

Q: How do catamaran and monohull liveaboards differ?

There are notable differences between catamaran and monohull liveaboards. Catamarans typically provide more living and storage space, as well as more privacy due to their dual-hull design.

They’re also known to have better stability, which can make for a more comfortable living experience onboard.

Monohulls , however, can be more affordable and easier to maintain, and offer better sailing performance in certain conditions.

Q: Which type of boat is more suitable for Yacht Week: a catamaran or a monohull?

Both catamarans and monohulls can make for a fantastic Yacht Week experience, and the choice ultimately depends on your preferences and the specific event you’re attending.

Catamarans are ideal for those who prioritize stability, speed, and a more spacious layout for socializing.

Monohulls may be better suited for those who enjoy a more traditional sailing experience or are looking for a more budget-friendly option. Always consider the preferences of your crew and the requirements of the event when making your decision.

Final Words!

In summary, both designs offer their own unique advantages and drawbacks.

However, you should consider factors like your sailing goals, preferences in boat handling, and the type of waters you’ll be frequenting when deciding between a catamaran or monohull.

Both options have their merits, and your decision will ultimately be shaped by what best suits your unique needs and desires. Happy sailing!

Want More Tips? 

Subscribe to Cruising Sea newsletter  to receive every two-week the latest post straight to your inbox

Which yacht do you prefer, a catamaran or a monohull? Feel free to share your opinion in the comments below.

Daniella has been passionate about travel, the sea, and nature for many years. As a child, she frequently traveled throughout the Mediterranean and continued with her journeys throughout her adult life.

Her experiences have created the desire within her to share her love for traveling with other passionate and adventurers who want to discover beautiful horizons and new cultures.

10 thoughts on “Catamaran VS Monohull Sailing – Which Is Best For You?”

This is a very interesting article, but I think it’s very clear which side you come down on! I would tend to agree and you have laid the key points out nicely to create a strong argument for the cat. I have been on both, but I’m definitely not a sailor, but the thing I remembered the most was the smoother ride that you get with the cat. So I agree with you!

Yes, you get a smoother ride with a Cat than with a Mono due to the two hulls and not to forget that the Cat is lighter than a Mono:)

Thank you for the comment

I wish you a great day!

Hello Daniella, I am mostly a ballast when sailing but thank you for this nice article. I’ve been curious what are the differences of catamarans vs monohulls and thanks to You now i have a little better understanding. And since i was sailing on monohull now it’s time to check out catas 😉 Maybe You could you provide some more information about renting prices of catas vs mono ? I couldn’t find it here and I think it could also play a big factor when chartering a yacht. Cheers!

You are right, I didn’t mention this important detail. Sorry about it! Here is the answer. A Catamarans is generally more expensive than a monohull of the same size and the reason is because the cat is a larger boat. But you’ll get the payback in the comfort and space.

I hope it helped!

Thank you for the comment and wish you a nice day

For myself I have always owned a mono haul sailboat for the fun of sailing around. To actually do a trip on one with others, I would choose the more spacious catamaran for down south in the warmer waters.

Not knowing much about the catamaran, it was nice to read a side by side description to have a better understanding between the two.

I am glad you found this article helpful and I hope it will help you to make the right choice. If you have never tried a catamaran, then I highly suggest you to try it, I am sure you will love it!

Thank you for the comment and wish you to sail soon!

Have an awesome day

I’ll go for Monohull in this case. I’ll rather sail alone or take a person with me on board. Not keen on having a group.

As I mention before, design is one thing I emphasise on but there are lots of people on board, I think I’ll stick by having more space than more passengers.

Thanks for sharing by the way, Daniella! They’re very analytical and informative, just like the previous debate I red. Good stuff!

As long as you feel good with your choice, then no matter what you’ll choose, it will be the good decision!

I personally love catamarans:) I feel much more comfortable and safe on these boats and the seasickness is reduced to 80%, so I won’t give up on Cats!

A Catamaran sounds awesome to me! I love that there is more living space and that they can be faster in the right winds. I’ve always thought they were so cool whenever I’ve seen one. So much space to relax and enjoy the ocean. I personally do more dinghy sailing and like for sailing to be more of a workout – hiking upwind and such. What big boats sail most like a dinghy?

Yes, I totally agree with you, Catamarans are great boats for cruising. As you said, cats have everything in order to sail comfortably and in luxury as well. As far as I know, a dinghy will always be a boat and you can try to workout as you do it on a dinghy on a bigger boat like a catamaran or a monohull. If you want to navigate the boat by yourself, then you’ll need to check if you are required to have a license for bigger vessels. You might need to do a sailing course.

However, I hope it helped and if you need more information, please don’t hesitate to contact me at any time, I’ll be glad to assist:)

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. *

• Articles and Guides

Catamaran vs Monohull: The Great Sailboat Debate

16th jun 2023 by john burnham.

Do you love the natural sounds of water sliding past the boat’s hull and a breeze blowing across your rigging and sails while gliding ahead powered only by the force of the wind? If yes, you are well-suited to spending plenty of time on a sailboat, like so many generations of boat people before you. 

But do you take your lead from the Egyptians who rigged sails on their boats built of reeds along the Nile River or follow the path of the Polynesians, who used an outrigger for extra stability and sailed from one Pacific island to the next in the earliest catamarans?

The question of which is better for sailing, one hull or two, has been a matter of debate over thousands of years. Today, let’s explore these two basic types of sailboat, and while we may not settle the argument once and for all, hopefully in the process you will begin to discover which option is better for you.

What Are the Differences Between Catamaran and Monohull Boats?

The monohull and the catamaran (often referred to as “cat”) are the two most common categories of sailboats, and of the two, the monohull far outnumbers the catamaran in popularity due to its simplicity and sturdiness. Advocates of the catamaran, however, are typically even more convinced than monohull sailors that their boats are best due to performance potential and overall spaciousness.  

What are catamaran-style boats?

Catamarans are easily identified by their two-hull design. Two hulls sit side by side with an interconnecting deck or structural beams across the bap in the middle. Catamarans have been around since Pacific Islanders and other Austronesian people sailed them centuries ago, and they continue to gain popularity in a wide range of designs both as high-performance racing boats and ocean-cruising designs.

Although not part of this debate, a third sailboat type comparable to a catamaran is a trimaran. Trimaran sailboats are constructed similarly to catamarans but have three parallel hulls rather than two. Collectively, catamarans and trimarans are referred to as multihulls, and sailors of both types often refer lightheartedly to monohulls as “monomarans.”

What are monohull-style boats?

Monohull sailboats are the most common boat type because they feature a single hull, typically with a single mast and two sails. Rather than maintaining stability with a second hull creating a wider beam, monohull boats usually carry lead or other heavy ballast in their keel, or are stabilized by human weight as their crews lean out to counter the force of the wind. Monohulls can also be excellent racers and cruisers, depending on their size, volume, sail area, and displacement or weight.

Where Catamarans and Monohulls Excel 

Each type of boat has its advantages, depending on what the owner wants in a boat. Here are the main advantages of each type.

Catamaran advantages

• More space .  Catamarans have greater beam for a given length, which provides more space for the crew on a daysailer and larger living quarters on cruising designs, which are often laid out with berths in each hull and living quarters across the bridgedeck between hulls.

• Faster hull . If they are light enough, the sleeker shape and reduced wetted surface of two narrow, shallow hulls can produce quicker straight-line sailing speed than a single, deeper and wider hull.

• Comfort and stability . Two hulls provide better initial stability and generally heel less than monohulls, especially in light- or medium-strength winds and waves.

Monohull advantages

• Upwind sailing . When sailing against the wind, monohulls often sail at a closer angle to the wind and arrive more quickly at their destination.

• Easier motion . Heavier monohulls often have a slower, gentler motion in waves than a lighter catamaran. 

• Load carrying capability . A monohull’s performance is reduced less than a catamaran’s when the boat is loaded heavily with cargo or crew.  

• Righting characteristics . Larger monohulls have weighted keels that provide increased resistance to a capsize when the boat is heeled far over by wind or a wave and if capsized will return the boat to an upright position.

Catamaran vs. Monohull Sailing Speed

There are several reasons why a catamaran is often faster than a monohull boat. These include the fact that most catamaran hulls have less water resistance than monohulls, they are often lighter, and they can be more easily driven by a relatively small sailplan. At similar lengths, a catamaran can be dramatically faster than a monohull under similar sea conditions. However, weight is the enemy of a catamaran’s speed; a heavy or heavily loaded catamaran may be much slower than a lightweight monohull.

Catamaran vs. monohull power

A monohull under auxiliary power may be faster than a catamaran in certain conditions, like powering against a strong wind. In other wind and wave conditions, the catamaran is often faster. Also, with an engines on each hull, the cat is often much more maneuverable in close quarters or at the marina. While it may seem counter-intuitive, turning and controlling the boat is often less challenging than when sailing a monohull boat with the typical single engine. Monohull boats require more finesse when in tight quarters like berthing in a marina.

Catamaran vs. Monohull Efficiency

A sleek monohull may sail against the wind super efficiently, pointing close to the wind and making an excellent speed. However, the power-to-weight ratio of the catamaran allows it to make good use of whatever wind it has. Some fast, light catamarans can travel at speeds equal to or faster than the wind, something very few monohulls can achieve. When the wave action increases and you start sailing into the wind, the catamaran may lose its advantage, and in strong winds, the greater windage of the wide catamaran may have a pronounced slow-down effect compared to the sleeker monohull.  

Catamaran vs. Monohull Stability

Despite not having a weighted keel, a catamaran design is able to avoid heeling over in strong winds or bad weather due to its greater width or beam. As a result, the multihull also tends to be more stable at anchor and any time in calmer seas. However, if the winds are strong and the waves are large, a monohull, with its keel weight and ability to sail against the wind while controlling the sails, is sometimes the steadier of the two types. While a monohull with weighted keel can be knocked down by strong gusts of wind, it will only capsize in extremely large waves. Likewise, a cruising catamaran can only capsize in large ocean waves, unless it is a fast, lightweight catamaran, that can more easily tip over in gusty winds and waves.

Catamaran vs. Monohull Safety

Power catamarans and power monohulls are relatively comparable in terms of safety. But depending on the size of the mast and sails, the weight of the boat, and the wind and wave conditions experienced, many sailors believe that a monohull configuration is safer than a catamaran for a sailboat. That’s mainly because while a monohull will initially heel over further in a strong gust of wind, the weight of its keel provides increasing stability as described above and if completely capsized, the keel typically helps the boat self rescue.

It should be clarified that many sailing catamaran designs are conservatively configured and difficult to capsize except in extreme ocean wave conditions—and the same can be said for larger power catamarans. 

In terms of ultimate safety in the event of a capsize, however, the catamaran is considered safer because even should it turn once upside down, even if damaged, the catamaran with its two hulls and minimal ballast typically remains buoyant and provides a safer configuration in which to await rescue. By contrast, if a monohull’s hatches and port windows suffer damage in a knockdown, the boat can more quickly take on water and, weighed down by its keel or other ballast, be more difficult to keep afloat in extreme conditions.

Photo credit: Fountaine Pajot

Monohull vs. Catamaran Maintenance

Depending on size, age, and type of hull construction, maintenance costs will vary, but when comparing two fiberglass sailboats of similar length, the catamaran typically costs more to maintain. That’s because there are two hulls to care for, two engines, connecting structures that align the two hulls, and an overall larger boat due to the catamaran’s greater beam. Hauling and launching a catamaran can be more expensive at many boatyards, as well.

However, smaller catamarans of about 20 feet in length or less are often more comparable and sometimes cheaper to maintain than a similar length monohull. That’s because cats are often lighter and suitable for keeping on a trailer rather than in a slip or on a mooring.

Catamaran vs. Monohull Cost

Compared to similar length monohulls, a catamaran will likely cost more than a monohull boat. That’s mainly because when you purchase a 40-foot catamaran, you are buying two hulls and two engines, but you are also buying a bigger boat that typically has much more volume. In the case of a 40-footer, you end up with a boat that has a large saloon and three or four private cabins, whereas in the monohull, the saloon is smaller and you’ll have three smaller sleeping cabins. Annual maintenance will also be greater, as described above.  

Among smaller catamarans and monohulls, pricing will vary, and a lightweight beach cat may be less expensive than a heavier monohull keelboat of similar length.

Catamaran vs. Monohull, Pros and Cons

Depending on a variety of factors, there are plenty of catamaran and monohull pros and cons. These are some to keep in mind when comparing the two boat types.

Catamaran pros

• Comfort . On a cruising designed catamaran, two hulls with a wide beam create a stable and comfortable living environment with open spaces and plenty of standing room.

• Speed . Smaller, lighter catamarans are speed champions, especially in a moderate wind and modest waves. Cruising cats are often fast when sailing at reaching angles.

• Maneuverability . When equipped with two engines, a catamaran is highly maneuverable under power.

Monohull pros

• Upwind sailing . Although catamarans are often faster when sailing in a straight line, monohulls typically perform better against the wind.

• Self-righting . Except for unballasted monohulls that rely on crew weight for stability, the ballasted keel of a monohull prevents capsizing in most circumstances and the keel makes the boat self-righting.

• Maneuvering under sail . Monohulls turn more easily due to their shape, maneuvering in close quarters or tacking when sailing against the wind.

Catamaran cons

• Lack of feel when steering . Except in lighter, more performance-oriented catamarans, the broad platform with two rudders and two hulls sometimes isolates the sailor and provides little feedback through the helm when under sail.

• Sailing against the wind . Upwind sailing is generally not a catamaran’s best point of sail, but its straight-line speed can be such that it may arrive quickly at its destination, even though you will have traveled much farther than in a monohull.

• Pricing . Catamarans are typically more expensive than monohull boats due to their two hulls and other required build components and complexity.

• Not self-righting . Thanks to its wide beam and two-hull design, a catamaran is more difficult to flip, but it is not designed to right itself except for small beach cats where the crew can use their weight to re-right the boat.

Monohull cons

• Weight . Most monohulls have thousands of pounds of weight in the keel for ballast that is vital to its stability but can degrade performance.

• Wave motions .   Monohull boats are much more susceptible to rolling wave motions.

• Cabin . With the monohull cruising design, you'll typically find a darker interior with smaller port windows and fewer space options.

• Heeling effect . Monohulls will heel over in a moderate wind, which is normal but often uncomfortable for newer sailors.

Written By: John Burnham

John Burnham is a marine ​editor and writer with ​decades of journalism experience as ​Chief Editor of​ boats.com,​ Sailing World, Cruising World, and ​other boating websites. As a competitive sailor, he has led teams to world and national titles in the International One-Design, Shields, and other classes. Based in Newport, Rhode Island, John is a​ PCC leadership coach, a member of the ​America’s Cup Hall of Fame Selection Committee​, and a ​past board member of Sail America and US Sailing. For more, see  johnsburnham.com .

More from: John Burnham

Related Articles and Guides

30th Mar 2024

Best Boat Navigation Apps for Smartphones

29th Mar 2024

Best Jet Boat Brands Among All Types of Small Craft

26th Mar 2024

Best Sport Fishing Boats, Convertible and Express to Center Console

20th Mar 2024

Best Wakesurf Boat Brands, V-Drive, Jet-Drive, Forward-Drive & More

• Explore Rightboat
• Boats for Sale
• Boating Articles
• Buyers Guide
• About RightBoat
• Sell Your Boat
• Boat Selling Advice

Enter your email to keep up to date with the latest news

Join for free

Sign up now for free and discover how easy it is to keep up to date with THE latest boats for sale. Find your right boat, and tailor your voyage to finding your next boat.

Benefits of becoming a member:

• Set up tailored alerts
• Personalise your experience
• Download full specifications and broker details
• Keep tabs on your favourite boats

Are you a broker? Join as a Broker

Rightboat - join for free.

Do you have an account already? Login

Save this search

Save your search and receive new boats in your email..

You can unsubscribe from your alerts whenever you like. By pressing the button you accept the Legal Terms and conditions

Catamaran vs Monohull – Which is Better?

Which is better a catamaran or a monohull.

I’m often asked by my students why one would choose a sailing monohull or a sailing catamaran for their adventures. The simple answer is: There is no simple answer — it depends on a lot of things, perhaps the most important one is your preference. “Yeah, well, this is my first week sailing ever, so how do I have a preference?” Let’s explore the differences and discuss the ins and outs of sailing, chartering, performance, and living aboard either vessel.

Notice that I don’t say “pros” and “cons” when considering the differences between the two vessels. To some, the gentle rocking of the monohull elicits nostalgia for a bygone youth spent sailing dinghies in the bay. To others, it represents sleepless nights, banging kitchenware, and angry spouses.

Short Summary – Catamaran vs Monohull

Generally, I describe my preference as follows: If I want to invite guests that are not frequently on the water, have less tolerance for “bumpy” nights, or expect a more “luxury” experience (you’ll see why I put it in quotes shortly) then I select a sailing catamaran. There is more room to spread out (vs the same length mono), rocking at anchor/mooring is minimized, and the kids love playing on the trampoline. Or perhaps phrased differently, “If you want to drink from beach to beach…”

DO NOT DRINK ALCOHOL WHILE OPERATING ANY VESSEL. EVER.

If, however, you want to put some miles down sailing from port to port in the Med (or wherever you have variable wind direction), then the mono is probably the better option. It has better upwind performance and costs less in marinas.

Let’s get into the details. We’re going to compare a suitable, common charter catamaran ( Lagoon, 40 ’) with a good, common charter monohull (Beneteau, 41’).

Sailing and Performance

The monohull total tacking angle is about 90-100 degrees apparent wind angle (AWA). This means that the closest close-haul sailing angle achievable is approximately 45-50 degrees off the wind. The comparable catamaran has a total tacking angle of about 110-120 degrees (55-60 degrees AWA off the wind). This loss is due to the extra leeway experienced in the catamaran. This is a significant difference when trying to beat to windward and can mean the difference between sailing the entire distance vs putting the sails up for show only. For those interested in math, the progress into the wind is determined by the cosine of the close haul sailing angle (angle of the wind) times the length of the leg on that tack.

windward distance = cosine(𝜶) x leg length

Where α is the close haul sailing of the vessel. Table 1 compares the windward distance achieved of 3 sailing angles over a leg length of 1 unit (nautical mile, km, etc). For example, if the leg length is 1 nm, and 7 legs are sailed, a total distance of 7 nm is covered. However, the progress to windward is not 7 nm, but

cosine(𝜶) x leg length = cos(45°) x 7 nm = 0.71 x 7 nm = 5.0nm

for a monohull sailing 45° to the wind, and 4.0 nm for a catamaran sailing 55° to the wind. The final difference after 7 tacks each is 1.0 nm, which would take the catamaran an additional 2 tacks (and just shy of 2 nm distance sailed) to make up the difference.

Table 1. Sailing Angle and Distance Comparison Sailing Angle (off the wind) Windward Distance Achieved % loss from 45°

Figure 1. Sailing Angle Mono vs Cat

A real-life example

Sailing from Mallorca on a new Lagoon 40. We needed to sail directly upwind in about 20 knots of wind, 3 miles from Cala Mondragó to Cala D’Or. It took over 2 hours and we sailed over 7 nm. As you can see, the tacking angle is far from 90º typical to a monohull.

Additionally, the loss to each tack must be considered. Speed and headway is lost with each tack – the mono carries its momentum much better (minimal speed loss) through the tack and has minimal leeway loss compared to the catamaran. The cat loses a tremendous amount of its momentum and experiences significant leeway loss. And it has to take more tacks to make the same windward distance, rendering the loss greater than that just lost to having to sail a greater distance due to the tacking angle.

Daggerboards greatly reduce leeway and give catamarans excellent upwind performance on par with monohulls. There are reasons why all cats don’t just have daggerboards. Especially on charter boats, one mistake, leaving the boards down, in shallow water can destroy the boat.

Across the wind (most reaching situations), the catamaran is faster. Upwind, the mono makes better progress due to the tacking/sailing angle. Downwind is a competition.

Downwind is where catamarans really shine. The stability and smooth ride is no comparison to a monohull. We sailed Never Say Never, our Lagoon 400S2 from Hilton Head SC to Ft Lauderdale, we had a NE wind of 20-25 knots. For us to stay inshore of the Gulf Stream to avoid rough conditions, we were wing-on-wing for over 24 hours, surfing down gently at over 7 knots. We covered over 160 miles in 24 hours. Escorted by dolphins, this was one for the books —non-stop 3-day delivery.

Comfort & Stability

The catamaran doesn’t heel (well, it shouldn’t. I guess if that’s the case we’re having another conversation ). No heeling can mean easier walking about while underway: we’re all familiar with walking on level ground; walking with the ground at an angle is a less-common experience. However, there is an oft-missed discussion about the mono’s stability on a heel. Waves tend to roll under the mono’s hull. Once sea legs are found, the motion of the hull on the water is predictable and smooth.

The cat’s motion on waves tends to bounce between two “stable” states: one resting on the starboard hull, the other resting on the port hull. You get a slight, but sudden rock to starboard when the wave passes under the port pontoon, then a sudden return to port as the wave passes under the starboard hull. This tends to be a jarring motion all day. So while some argue that mono heeling is tiring, others will argue that this cat phenomenon is tiring. A sarcastic captain often says:

“One benefit of a cat, you get each wave twice!”

Each vessel has its own quirks for sail trim, so that is a wash. I can read a mono’s sails much easier than a cat’s, but I sailed monos for 20+ years before trying cats so I may be biased.

Catamaran vs Monohull Safety

The mono gives lots of feedback about being overpowered long before it becomes a problem: heel angle and weather helm are the loudest. The cat is much more subtle: mast and boom groans, light windward pontoon, lack of steerability. Experiment with the main traveller position and reefing on a schedule per the owners manual to find the optimum sail configuration on a cat.

When the seas pick up, catamarans do much better downwind. Monohulls tend to roll, yaw and wallow in the troughs and round up on the face of the waves. Catamaran’s tend to surf straight down the waves. A force 7-8 blow can be enjoyable. Stow your main and run with just the jib downwind on a cat and you’ll see the beauty and ease to steer this configuration.

“When the seas pick up, catamarans do much better downwind. Monohull’s tend to roll, yaw and wallow in the troughs”

Chartering and Living Aboard Considerations

Charter cost – cats are 30-60% more expensive than the equivalent mono.

In marinas, the cat rate is usually 50% greater than the mono rate. And, unless you get a reservation long in advance, they might not have room for you.

On moorings, depending on the bow cleat location, the mooring lines can run over or along portions of the hull of the cat. This leads to line stretch-and-relaxation noise all night long. For anyone in the forward cabins, this is a nightmare. Or worse since you can’t even get to sleep to have a nightmare.

Cats tend to have shallower draft and therefore can anchor closer to the beach. If wind and swell are from the same direction, cats tend to weather it better at anchor. Due to the bridle, cats do not swing on anchor. Older monos used to swing a lot, modern designs have reduced this swing tremendously.

There is lots more room on a cat to house the luxury amenities like A/C, water makers, and generators. Though, modern design is allowing for clever locations for these items in the mono, so there will probably be more monos becoming available with these options.

Cats tend to carry more potable water than the mono. They also carry more fuel. And burn more. Our weekly mono fuel bill ranges from $80-150 USD. Our weekly cat fuel bill ranges from $180-300 USD. (1.) Though you pay more for a catamaran, most systems are redundant. Two engines are better than one.

Catamaran vs Monohull Maneuverability

Cats are far easier to maneuver under power due to the two engines being separated by such a great distance. This makes picking up moorings, dropping and weighing anchor, and docking a breeze.

I would argue that monos are easier to manoeuvre under sail due to large rudders and heavy keels. The heavy keel maintains its momentum through manoeuvres much better than the cat. The large rudder means a small helm adjustment is quickly experienced in the respective heading. This large rudder also reduces steerage way to about 0.75-1.0 kts, whereas the cat is about 2.5 kts. While I doubt we’ll see cheaters , I mean bow thrusters, on 40’ monos, I have seen them on 44’ monos before. This added amenity makes up for greatly increased manoeuvrability while docking or weighing anchor.

Dinghy Storage

Storing the dinghy on the davits is a wonderful location for passages of any length. The reduced drag from not towing it is immediately seen in increased sailing speed. Monos must carry theirs on the bow or tow it astern. And you have to take the engine off too. Usually by hand, so you are not going to see a 20HP electric start engine on a dinghy for a 40’ mono. Not that you’d see that size for a 40’ cat either, but a 9.9 – 15 HP isn’t out of the question.

Ultimately, it boils down to what your preferences are. Do you like the extra space and amenities the cat provides? Do you like the sailing performance of the mono? Again, I choose a cat to sail from island to island in the Caribbean, where having a water maker or A/C is nice, fairly flat water is expected at all times, and anchoring close to the beach is a cool experience for everyone on board. I choose a mono to sail greater distances, go offshore, or hop from one marina to another in the Med.

1. This article was written in the spring of 2022, just before the crazy increase in fuel prices.  As of publication date, these numbers need to be adjusted higher by about 50-100%

Ben Martin is a long-standing instructor at Nautilus Sailing. ASA 201, 203, 204, 205, 214 Certified Instructor, RYA Yachmaster Offshore, USCG 100 Ton Captain. Ben grew up in Northern Maine sailing dinghies on a lake. He graduated from University of Maine with a Master’s in Electrical Engineering. After working for the US Navy for a few years, he decided to pursue his passion on the water and worked as a charter yacht captain for several years in the Caribbean and the Mediterranean. Eventually, his career led to sailing instruction and he hasn’t looked back since.

• ← Prev Post
• Next Post →

HOW IT WORKS

Connect With Us

Plan Your Trip

START YOUR SAILING JOURNEY NOW

As featured in.

EXCLUSIVE EVENTS

The only way to join our tribe is to learn to sail with Nautilus.

We’re really careful to make sure that we know and trust anyone coming on one of our special trips.

Join us on flotillas, offshore deliveries, free webinars and unforgettable sailing adventures around the world. Join the Tribe.

• TERMS OF USE
• Privacy Policy

Catamaran Or Monohull? 27 Important Facts (Explained)

Catamarans and monohull boats are two very different kinds of vessels.  Each craft offers distinct advantages and disadvantages that you’ll want to consider before choosing between the two.

In this post, we’ll go over some of the important things to consider when choosing between catamarans and monohull boats:

Table of Contents

Cost & Availability

Both catamarans and monohull boats come in small recreational sailing versions, larger motorboat versions, and larger sailing models.  In all cases, the catamarans will cost more and will be harder to find.

The reason catamarans are harder to find because there are not as many of them, and they’re mostly made overseas.

Also, there aren’t as many catamaran manufacturers, so sailors have fewer options when buying them.

On top of this, catamarans have only recently become popular in the United States and other areas of the developed world.  This means the used market for boats doesn’t have as many catamarans on it.  You might find that you have fewer options when making a used catamaran purchase, which could bring costs up to a premium.

Two Times The Fun with Catamarans

Another reason that catamarans are more expensive than monohulls is the fact that catamaran buyers have to purchase two hulls, two engines, and two of all of the components that help make an engine work.

Traditional sailboats and large powerboats with one engine don’t have this cost issue.

On top of this, a catamaran is much wider than a monohull, and thus you have more space to build and equip.

On the other hand, once you’ve purchased the boat, you do get to enjoy the benefits of having two of everything.  We’ll talk about the advantages of this further down in this post.

Maintenance Cost Makes A Difference

The maintenance on a catamaran is also more expensive than the maintenance on a monohull boat.  This goes back to the fact that there is twice as much of everything to maintain.

Catamaran owners will need to do preventative maintenance on two different engines, and they’ll have two hulls and a large deck area to clean and maintain as well.  If they’re getting the bottom of the boat treated, they’ll have to do this twice (once for each hull).

Even the interior components can usually be found twice.

Each cabin will usually have a head in it, so you’ll have at least two toilets and sinks to maintain, which obviously has its plusses and minuses.

One positive aspect of this is that catamaran owners do have the option of deferring some of their maintenance.  For example, if one head is no longer functioning properly, you always have the second one that you can use.

It also adds a bit of safety as well.

This is because while the catamaran does have two engines to maintain, the owner does have power even if one of the engines happens to go down.

Some catamaran owners also like to point out that maintenance may not have to be done as frequently.  This is because the engines don’t have to work quite as hard, and other items like additional bathrooms and sinks might only be used half as much.

How Much Space Do You Need?

A catamaran has more space than a monohull.  This is because the boat is wider, and it has a much larger deck area.  It also has twice as many hulls, so you have more overall space between the two of them.

The additional space is great for people looking to throw parties on their boats.

Most boat owners would agree that the catamaran is usually the party boat of choice at the docks.

Even if you aren’t into throwing parties, the extra space can still be nice for relaxing on the deck or getting a suntan.  The wide-open space also makes it easy to use the boat as a fishing platform.

Additionally, you have more space for stuff like surfboards, rafts, and other items that can easily clutter up the deck of a monohull.  Even fishing can be easier from a catamaran as the deck provides plenty of space between different anglers.

Catamaran owners also have additional space for carrying fresh water and adding generators and solar panels.

Interior space is generally more plentiful on a catamaran, and luxury catamarans have an easier time fitting large items like washers and dryers inside of them.  You can have these on larger monohulls as well, but it will be harder to make them fit than it is in a catamaran.

On the other hand, all of the additional space means the catamaran owner has more space to maintain and clean.  Also, all of the additional items that can be brought onto the boat will make it heavier.  A heavier boat will use more fuel, and it will travel more slowly.

Living Quarters Vary Between The Two

The living quarters on a catamaran are much different than they are on a monohull.  Most people would agree that the berths in a monohull are much more spacious than in a catamaran.

A monohull offers people the opportunity to have a large bed with space on either side to walk around it.  This is great for couples who want to get out of bed without waking up their partner.

Catamarans, on the other hand, have the advantage of being able to offer large above-deck salon areas.  The galleys, the dining areas, and the living areas can all be above-deck, while the two hulls can provide heads and berths.

Some boat owners say that living in a monohull is akin to living in a basement apartment .  Other boat owners prefer the monohull because it brings them closer to the water and gives them the feeling of being at sea.

Privacy Can Be Prioritized On Catamarans

A catamaran offers up many different living areas that people can take advantage of.  For example, each hull will typically have its own bathroom and bedroom.

This gives each sleeping area complete privacy from the other.

The living quarters are usually up on the deck, so early risers can wake up and move to these quarters without waking up the others.

The same holds for night owls.  A night owl can stay up late without bothering the people who want to retire to their beds earlier.

With two hulls, large catamaran owners can hire a crew and give them their own hull to live in so that there is separation between the cruisers and the crew.  This is a wonderful advantage for honeymooners looking to have their own space.

The downside to all of this, of course, is that sometimes a family may not want the additional privacy.  For example, a family with small children might not want their children in a different hull than they are.

Additionally, the extra privacy can make it hard for people on the boat to communicate.  This could become a big problem in the event of an emergency.

For this reason, it is often recommended that each hull have a radio in it so that the occupants can quickly communicate with each other.  Remember, even in inland areas, cell phone reception may not be very good inside the boat hulls.

Recreation In a Monohull vs. a Catamaran

Most sailors agree that sailing a monohull boat is much more exhilarating than sailing a catamaran.  Traditional sailboats heel, and sailors get instant feedback while they’re sailing.  For the most part, catamarans stay stable, and you don’t get the same feeling with the movement of the wind and the water.

When it comes to monohull powerboats, you have the advantage of being able to pull water skiers, kneeboarders, and tubers with ease, as long as the boat has the power and a planing hull.  A power catamaran usually doesn’t have the speed or maneuverability to pull off these recreational opportunities because they are displacement hull designs.

Catamarans excel in more leisurely recreational activities.  A catamaran makes a great party deck as well as a great cruising deck.  Catamaran owners can comfortably walk around a catamaran without having to worry that the boat might knock them over the next time it decides to heel.  This allows boaters to sit and talk with one another comfortably.

A catamaran can also be used as a beaching vessel.  This makes it a great platform for people looking to go swimming or fishing around sand bars and other shallow water areas.  It also makes it a great boat for sailors looking to sail a larger boat on a river or lake known for having shallow areas.

Swimming and Diving

Swimming and diving off of a catamaran are usually much easier than doing the same from a monohull.  The wide stance of the two hulls offers boat designers the option to put in staircases at the back of both hulls.

In between these staircases, some boats will have an additional diving platform and/or a dedicated frame for pieces of equipment and dinghy storage.  This makes catamarans great for swimmers, snorkelers, and divers.

On the other hand, modern monohull sailboats can also have good transom stairs for easy access to the dinghy and swimming.  Both types of boats can easily travel far out to sea, giving boaters the option of diving in areas that can’t be accessed from beaches and developed areas.

Boat Draft In Shallow Waters

For the uninitiated, the boat’s draft refers to how deep the boat’s hull sits within the water.

A monohull typically sits deep within the water, while a catamaran sits much higher on the water.  This is why we stated that a catamaran is good for shallow waters.

The advantage of having a boat that can go into shallow waters isn’t restricted to just recreational activities like swimming and fishing.  A boat that can go into shallow water is safer to operate in areas where a boat with a deeper draft might become damaged.

Additionally, a catamaran has more stability on calm waters.  This helps make a catamaran more comfortable to relax or sleep on while at anchor or the dock.

The deeper draft of a monohull boat has its advantages as well.  A deeper draft provides more stability in rough waters and allows a boat to go further into the sea.

For this reason, many coastal cruisers will prefer catamarans, while many ocean voyagers will prefer monohull boats.  In fact, some areas of the Caribbean and the Florida Keys can be off-limits to boats with deep drafts as it simply isn’t safe for the boat to navigate these waters.

This isn’t to say that you can’t navigate these waters in a monohull boat, but you will have to be cautious depending on how deep your monohull’s boat draft is.  You wouldn’t have this issue in a catamaran.

Stability On The Sea

A catamaran offers a lot more stability in shallow waters, in calm waters, at the dock, and anchorage.  This makes the boat great for cruising and for relaxing in port.

A monohull offers a lot more stability in rough waters.

This makes this boat great for heading out to sea and for navigating vast distances.

Safety Issues To Consider

Both catamarans and monohulls can be built to navigate the waters they were made for safely.  This will be determined more by the boat’s category designation rather than the type of boat.

However, each boat deals with unsafe situations in different ways.  For instance, a monohull boat is likely to right itself if it is capsized.

This means that even in rough seas, you’re unlikely to find yourself permanently capsized.

The downside to this is that should you become completely swamped from a capsize in a monohull boat, you are much more likely to sink.  In fact, if there is a hull breach on a monohull boat, your boat could sink.

Catamarans are said to be unsinkable.  This isn’t completely true, but it is very unlikely that a catamaran will sink.  Even if a hull is breached, you still have a second hull to keep the catamaran afloat.

However, a catamaran can’t right itself.  If you capsize your catamaran, it will stay capsized.

One other safety concern to consider is that a monohull sailboat will heel while a catamaran will not.  This increases the chances that someone could fall off the boat or onto the deck in a monohull boat.

Catamarans Are Faster Than Monohull Boats

A catamaran is faster than the average monohull boat.

This is because they face less water resistance, and their narrow hulls don’t have to deal with their own bow waves as a monohull does.

Of course, catamarans aren’t always faster.  Old cruising catamarans may not go faster than 8 knots, and modern monohulls can exceed 10 knots.

Monohull boats tend to sail downwind and in choppy seas better than catamarans.  This gives them a speed advantage during ocean voyages.

We have a separate post with complete average speeds per type of catemaran . It’s a must read if you are at all concerned about speed!

Fuel Consumption Considerations

Catamarans have two engines to burn fuel, which can drive up fuel costs.

However, a catamaran is lighter on the water, so it usually takes less energy to move a catamaran.  This means you’ll end up using less fuel in a catamaran than you would in a monohull.

On top of this, catamarans can decide to use just one engine in low wind areas.  This further decreases the amount of fuel that a catamaran consumes.

These rules only apply to calm waters.

A monohull navigates waters with high waves and strong winds much more efficiently than a catamaran.  In this case, you’ll use less fuel in a monohull than you would in a catamaran.

Sailing Differences To Notice

Sailing a monohull boat can be exhilarating.  These boats can glide through choppy waters, and you get to feel the motion of the boat as the sea rushes by the cockpit and the wind causes you to heel.

This type of sailing also provides instant feedback as you’ll know what you need to do with the sails as you’ll feel what is going on through the boat’s motion.

Sailors all over the world have been using monohull sailboats for years, and you’ll find plenty of outlets for recreational sailing with a monohull sailboat.

Sailing catamarans do not heel like a monohull sailboat.

These boats, therefore, do not provide the sailor with instant feedback.  Also, if you incorrectly sail a catamaran, you do risk capsizing the boat more easily.

Training Can Be Quite Hard

Sailing a catamaran and sailing a monohull boat are two different experiences.  People looking to sail either should probably get professional training.

Obtaining this training will always be easier with a monohull boat.

This is because monohulls are more popular, so you’ll have more instructors available to you.

Do You (Or Your Friends) Get Seasick?

People who are prone to getting seasick easily might want to consider a catamaran.  A catamaran provides much more stability in calm waters, and you get a lot less movement.

On the other hand, people who are not prone to getting seasick might prefer a monohull in choppy waters.

This is because a monohull will deal with deep and choppy waters with high waves much better than a catamaran will.

As a result, a catamarans movement can seem extreme under these types of conditions.  People who have never gotten seasick before can end up sick under these conditions.

Here’s a separate article we wrote with everything you should know about seasickness on Catamarans . There are some things you can do and some things you should know!

Docking Is (Usually) Easier With A Monohull Boat

Docking a catamaran can be a difficult endeavor.

This is because catamarans are often too wide to be docked within the slips located in central areas of a marina.

Because of this, they need to be docked at the end of the dock.  This leaves them with fewer spots to dock.  It also makes docking more expensive.

Catamaran owners traveling through areas that are unlikely to have many catamarans in them may find it difficult to find a dock at all.  This is true in areas of the northern Atlantic where monohulls are much more popular than catamarans.

Storage Issues To Consider

Even storing a catamaran can be more difficult.  This is because storage facilities often do not have the equipment to get a catamaran out of the water.

The wide width of these boats requires special lifts, and not all boat marinas will have them.

Storage facilities that do get the catamaran out of the water will often charge more money for it.  They’ll charge additional fees for taking the catamaran out of the water, and they’ll charge additional fees for the actual storage of the boat as well.

Redundancy And Backup Equipment

We touched upon this earlier, but it is worth repeating that catamarans have many redundancy built into them.  This can be a big advantage when it comes to safety.

For example, if one rudder becomes inoperable, the boat can still be steered with the other one.  If one engine becomes inoperable, the boat can still be driven with the other one.

In extreme cases, a hull could become damaged, and you could still stay afloat because the other hull will keep the boat safely above water.  These safety advantages can save lives and keep people from becoming stranded out at sea.

The primary downside is the maintenance issue that we mentioned earlier.  All of these redundant components will need to be maintained.  As a result, maintenance costs will be close to twice as expensive in a catamaran.

Cooking Is Easier On Catamarans

Cooking on a catamaran is usually easier than it is on a monohull.  The main reason for this is that a catamaran doesn’t heel like a monohull, so you don’t have to worry as much about things falling over.

This not only makes cooking easier, but it makes cooking safer as well.

Additionally, catamaran galleys tend to have more space in them to move around.  Also, they are often up on the deck, so you don’t have to climb in and out of the hull with your dinner in hand.

Dinghy Storage

Monohulls and catamarans can both hold dinghies.  The larger the boat, the larger the dinghy can be.

However, catamarans have a wide area at the rear of the boat that is perfect for holding dinghies.

This makes getting in and out of the dinghy easier.  Also, people can often have larger dinghies on their catamarans because the boat’s stern is so accommodating.

Power Generation Is Easy On A Catamaran

A catamaran has a lot of space for solar panels and wind turbines.  Rigid panels can be placed in areas that won’t be walked on, like overtop of the bimini, and flexible panels can be placed in areas where the panels might end up getting stepped on.

The width of a catamaran even gives them more opportunities to put hydro generators into the water.

This means catamarans can generate more power than the average monohull boat can generate.

On the other hand, a monohull usually has less powered items to worry about.  Monohulls need less power to operate at full capacity, so you may not need all of the additional space for generating power.

Ventilation Issues To Think About

Some people feel that monohull boats don’t offer enough ventilation.  This is especially true in warmer areas of the world.

Catamarans also lack ventilation within their hulls, but fortunately for them, much of the living space is located up on deck.  This gives catamarans an edge when it comes to cruising in warm weather.

On the other hand, monohull owners aren’t exposed to the cold winds that you might find up on deck in harsher climates. 

This lack of airflow may actually be of benefit in this instance.

Some people find monohulls to be better looking than catamarans and vice versa.

This all comes down to personal preference, so you’ll have to decide for yourself which type of boat has the advantage in this case.

Some people think catamarans are the most elegant thing in the world while others prefer monohull boats as they look more classic.

Resale Value Is An Important Factor

If you read our extensive guide to boat depreciation per boat type , you know that no matter what boat you buy, it will always go down in value.  This is just a sad fact of boat ownership that people need to consider before buying a boat.

Many factors go into how much you’ll be able to get for your boat when you resell it.  These factors are the condition of the boat, the age of the boat, and the economy in general.  For example, people are less likely to want to buy boats during a recession.  This is especially true when it comes to smaller boats.

However, one additional factor that catamaran owners need to consider when thinking about resale value is the value of the dollar. 

People from the United States don’t have many American catamarans to choose from and will usually need to buy these overseas.

This means that a catamaran will be less expensive to buy when the dollar is strong compared to the Euro and more expensive to buy when the dollar is weaker in comparison.  This will affect the used market as well because higher values on new catamarans can help to bring up the value on the used market.

With a monohull boat, you may not have to consider situations like this as there are makers of monohull boats all over the world.

Don’t Let The Length Trick You!

One thought to keep in mind when comparing monohull boats and catamarans is that their different shapes account for different space advantages.

For example, a 40-foot long catamaran will have much more cubic space than a 40-foot long monohull.

Because of this, when comparing boats, you should look at the cubic space rather than the length. In this case, you may be comparing a 48-foot long monohull with a 40-foot long catamaran.

When you compare the two types of boats in this manner, the price differences aren’t quite as large, and the comparison is fairer.  It also may make the operating and maintenance costs more similar.

This is an important distinction to make because the length of the boats can trick you!

Consider Trying Both (Before Buying)

Boats can be an expensive purchase, so it makes sense to try them out before you decide to make your purchase.

Rent each type of boat and use it on the types of waters that you intend to cruise on the most.

Try the boat out in different weather conditions as well, and don’t be afraid to do multiple rentals before you make your final choice.  The time and money invested into making sure you get the boat you really want will be more than worth it in the end.

Click to share...

• Catamaran vs. Monohull: What Type of Boat is Right for You?
• Sailing Hub
• Sailing Dilemmas
• Catamaran vs. Monohull - which one should you choose?

When you are planning a sailing holiday, you’ll be faced with a choice; catamaran vs. monohull. Each type has many benefits, but it’s important to think about what your needs are because that will tell you just which one to pick!

Let's dive right in!

Ease of sailing

Maneuverability, space/layout, holiday vibe.

You may also like:  Sailing holiday destinations for your next boat trip

One of the top considerations you should have is what type of sailor you are because catamaran vs monohulls offer a distinctly different sailing experience. If you are a first time sailor and just want something incredibly easy to handle, then a catamaran will probably win out. 

Catamarans have great control when it comes to maneuvering in tight places. Since they have twin engines and rudders, you get a lot of control and can turn pretty much 360 degrees with ease.

Catamarans also have a shallow draft, which will allow you to explore much closer to the shoreline than a monohull would be able to venture. 

In the catamaran vs monohull speed debate, it might be more of a draw. Catamarans are typically 25-30% faster than a comparable monohull, but some argue that it comes at a price. When catamarans are sailing full speed you might experience a lot of slapping from the waves. Monohulls are designed to cut through the water. Also note that catamarans can be inefficient upwind and tack slowly. 

When considering sailing conditions , a catamaran vs monohull in rough seas will perform very differently. 

During rough sailing, you must be more vigilant when on a catamaran. The feedback from the wheel of a cat is not as obvious as that from a monohull. In high winds, you’ll need to know when to reduce sail. 

However, monohulls tend to roll more in stormy weather, while catamarans stay pretty level even in rough seas.

When thinking about catamaran vs monohull stability, the stability that catamarans offer is a huge draw for many. Since cats bounce with the waves less, it is easier to walk around and enjoy the yacht while in motion. The increased stability is also great for children, or seniors, or anyone who might be prone to seasickness. When it comes to catamaran vs monohull seasickness, catamarans come out on top.

Although it is worth noting that monohulls swing less than catamarans if placed side by side in an anchorage.

If you’re deciding on a catamaran vs. monohull, you’ll have to think about what type of group you have. For family sailing holidays , maybe a catamaran is the best choice. Catamarans are very spacious, offering a large living space, and many cabin/head options. This makes them optimal for parties that want to spread out. Whether you’re a family, a big group of friends, or even couples looking for a 5 star, luxury experience who appreciate the extra space and comfort even if it’s not needed, a catamaran can fit your needs.

If thinking about catamaran vs monohull liveaboard readiness, the catamaran is a top contender. With far more living space and a much more spacious kitchen, Catamarans are great for people and groups that want to focus on entertainment and lounging.  

Catamarans also typically have more spacious cabins and more privacy due to the layout with the cabins separate from the living area. This way you can send the kids to bed, and still enjoy the kitchen, dining, and living area. 

While catamarans are often touted for being roomy and luxurious, it’s worth nothing that monohull yachts can also be large and luxe. The Oceanis 62 and the Jeanneau 64 are top choices for those who want to live in the lap of luxury during their sailing holidays , while still getting that real sailing yacht experience.

In terms of catamarans vs monohull price , a monohull will definitely win. Charter prices for a catamaran can be 50-100% higher than that of a comparable sailing yacht. But that can be boiled down to the fact that you’re getting more space and more equipment with a catamaran! 

A monohull, will only have one of everything - like it’s name suggests. It has one hull, one engine, one rudder, whereas a catamaran has twice the equipment and twice the living space of a monohull of the same length.

Another catamaran vs monohull cost to consider is the mooring costs. A catamaran, due to its twin hulls, might use two spots. Monohulls take less space to moor, and will be less expensive in that regard. 

The cost of fuel should also be a consideration and in the question of catamaran vs monohull fuel efficiency, catamarans are the winner. With easy to drive hulls, and super light weight, they have great fuel efficiency. 

Lastly, there is an abundant supply of monohull charters yachts, so the charter costs tend to be less to match the demand. 

In the end, what it all comes down to is preference. In terms of performance, price, and comfort, catamarans and monohulls both have a lot going for them. You just need to decide what kind of holiday vibe you’re looking for, and Yacht4Less can help you with the rest! 

At Yacht4Less we recommend fully crewed catamaran charters if you’re looking for top-of-the-line luxury and a super relaxing holiday where you don’t have to lift a finger. These boats will offer the space and comfort you’d expect from a 5-star hotel. 

If you’re looking for a hands-on sailing adventure holiday, you might want to do a skippered charter with a monohull.. Your captain can show the ropes and help you learn how to sail. Or if you’re already an experienced sailor, go for a bareboat monohull charter . The exhilarating feeling of sailing a monohull is unmatched. It’s the classic romantic sailing experience, and makes for a thrilling holiday. 

For those looking for a sailing experience somewhere in between extravagant luxury and exciting escapades, Yacht4Less is here to help you find the perfect boat for your needs.  More sailing holiday dilemmas? We got you covered! Sailing Holidays vs. Land-Based Holidays  » Party Sailing vs. Natural Wonders  »

Get a free & non-binding quote

Matt Weidert

Catamaran vs Monohull: Why the Cat is Better for Your Sailing

• We enjoy the extra lounge space a cat provides, especially a flybridge if available - that's where we'll spend most of our time during the day
• We like the common areas being above the waterline and the better stability
• We care less about sailing performance - we are the type of crew that is OK dropping sails if the winds are light or it's more convenient to motor
• As the captain, I appreciate the maneuverability twin engines provide for docking - it keeps some stress out of the equation
• Most tend to come with generators, AC, and water makers: all features we enjoy on these trips

Space & lounging

Sailing performance, maneuverability.

• Comfort & Stability

• Catamaran draft: ~4-5 feet
• Monohull draft: ~5-6 feet

Comfort & stability

Explore these related articles from the Yacht Warriors

BVI vs Exuma Bareboat Charter: Exploring New Horizons

Explore BVI vs Exuma differences for bareboat charters, from logistics and cruising conditions to unique charter experiences.

The complete sailing trip packing list- Here’s What to Pack

We've perfected our sailing trip packing list over the years. Here's what to pack on your next trip - the obvious, and maybe not so-obvious.

2024 BVI Charter Season Preview

Find out what's new for the 2024 BVI charter season including new catamaran additions and the latest need-to-know charter developments.

When is your next yacht charter? Consider booking with the Yacht Warriors.

Charter. Beyond.

Get fresh ideas for your next yacht charter trip - insider guides, sailing itineraries, planning tips, and more. Subscribe and receive my free BVI Trip Planning Document.

• River Cruising

GCT M/S Tikhi Don - St. Petersburg to Moscow

By usnavyguy , June 24, 2012 in River Cruising

Recommended Posts

This is a review of a St. Petersburg to Moscow river cruise from 5/31/2012 - 6/14/2012 with Grand Circle Travel. I'll divide the review into sections starting with the ship so folks can jump to those sections of interest & ignore what isn't pertinent to them. For an excellent discussion on pre-trip planning, visa issues, comments on various cruise lines, this link:

http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=1559518

will give you all the details you need. I'll not repeat it here.

So, let's get to the specifics:

Ship : Tikhi Don is owned by Grand Circle Travel (GCT) and is one of two ships, the other being M/V Rossia they operate between Moscow & St. Petersburg. All the cabins are identical: 146 square feet with one window that opens, situated on 3 decks. The only difference is location on the ship. The cabins were clean as were the attached bathrooms. Storage space was adequate for two weeks. There is one 120V and one 220V electrical outlet in the cabin as well as a 115V electrical outlet in the bathroom. I purchased a 4 outlet power strip specifically for this trip to plug in rechargeable digital camera batteries as well as a cell phone. The ship has an elevator near the reception desk forward that services Decks 1, 2, and 3. There is a double stairway in the after end of the ship that runs from the Main Deck to Decks 2, 3, and 4. All other stairways are external and serve all 4 decks. We had about 206 passengers embarked and about 100 staff, so the ratio of staff to cruisers was pretty high. It seems that all river ships operating in Russia carry about 200 or so customers which make them quite a bit larger than the average European waterways river ship. Since they have far fewer bridges to deal with in terms of height, and water depths are somewhat deeper than European rivers, they can and do take advantage of that to leverage a larger number of customers. That doesn't make it bad; it just makes it different. Tikhi Don draws about 9 feet of water which I suspect is about average for a Russian river cruiser. The ship has two bars, one on the 3rd deck forward (Tsar Bar) and one on the 4th deck aft (Presidents Bar). The restaurant is located on the 2nd deck aft and is used for the breakfast buffet and the sit down daily lunches & dinners. One disadvantage to my way of thinking was the sit down lunch. When we've cruised on Viking, they offered a light buffet lunch in the bar/lounge and a sit down lunch in the restaurant. That gave one some options which weren't available with GCT. Again, not necessarily bad; just different. Each cabin is equipped with a flat panel LCD TV with various satellite channels available depending upon the location of the ship at the time. There also were 3 different movie channels showing a different movie each day. Since we didn’t watch TV, I can only surmise it must have worked okay as we did not hear any complaints. While each cabin has individual air conditioning controls, they didn’t appear to function very effectively and the cabin remained around 68-70 degrees Fahrenheit at all times. There is a separate heating unit mounted beneath the window on the outside bulkhead which proved very useful on some of the colder mornings we experienced during the cruise. The cruise covers 829 miles between St. Petersburg and Moscow, and consists of several lakes, rivers and canals including the transit of 16 locks.

Travelers: One significant difference I noted was the average age of the passengers was somewhat older than we had previously experienced with Viking in Europe. I would guess that average age was around mid-70s; some younger, and some a good bit older. We had several veterans of WW2 embarked and I can only hope I'm as spry as they were when I'm that age. They also are very loyal to GCT. Those folks who had previously traveled 3 or more times with GCT or their companion company, Overseas Adventure Travel were identified with a gold name badge. I'd estimate that at least 50% of the embarked travelers fell into this category. This was a very seasoned group of world travelers. Few on the trip were making their 1st river cruise and even fewer were traveling with GCT for the 1st time (we fell into that category). The tours generally involved quite a bit of walking and a not so slow pace, but most everyone managed to keep at it, and few opted out of the walking tours. I'll discuss those in more detail later in this post.

Ship Staff: The staff was quite young (mid to late 20s mostly), inexperienced, but always willing to help. Their command of English was generally very limited although I expect that will improve as the season wears on. Their English was way better than my Cyrillic so they get an A+ for effort. The cruise is managed by a Cruise Director who spoke idiomatic English. The ship's Captain was the most personable Captain I have ever sailed with on a cruise ship. He spoke good English, greeted all the travelers as they debarked for each tour, met each traveler at the gangplank when they returned, and along with the Cruise Director and Hospitality Manager stood on the pier and waved goodbye to every bus that departed. I'm used to the Captain putting in a brief appearance at the Welcome & Farewell Cocktail parties, then disappearing for rest of the cruise. This was a novel & most welcome change.

We were divided into 6 groups of about 32-35 people, assigned a Tour Director who worked exclusively with that group for the entire cruise. Very occasionally for an optional tour, the groups would be combined to keep the numbers about the same, but basically, you functioned within your assigned group. The Tour Directors all had majored in foreign languages at the University and had anywhere from two to as many as eight years with GCT. They all spoke idiomatic English and did a great job of keeping track of their charges. I liken managing U.S. tour groups to herding cats and these folks were always cheerful, ready to answer any question, and resolve any problem. The wait staff in the dining room had limited English, but knew enough to converse with the passengers with regard to the menu & was a hustling young group of Russians. They were extremely pleasant to deal with.

Food on Board: In general the meals were quite good. Breakfast was served buffet style and one always had the opportunity to order an omelet or eggs of any style. There also was a special breakfast order each day. They also included the European breakfast meats and other items common on European river cruise ships. Service was quick and efficient. Restaurant seating included tables for 2, 4, 6 or 10 passengers so there was a wide variety of seating. Lunches & dinners would be best described as Russian modified for American taste. As I remarked previously, all lunches were sit down, formal service with soup, entre (including a vegetarian selection). Salad bar and dessert. Dinners consisted of an appetizer, followed by a soup course, entre (again including a vegetarian choice), and dessert. At dinner, there was always available salmon or chicken breast with a baked potato and steamed vegetables for those who did not fancy the main course. Food was served hot when appropriate and cold when in order. Service was friendly and efficient. Even with 200 people sitting down to eat, there was no sense of “steam table” cooking. With the exception of two meals ashore, all meals were served onboard. In the event of an evening tour such as the Moscow circus or the St. Petersburg ballet, an early dinner was served to those attending the event, followed by a late night heavy snack following return onboard. While I did not eat very many lunches, my wife tried most of them and said the food was very good. We found the dinners to be tasty and a nice introduction to Russian cooking, including the famous Russian stroganoff which is not served over noodles as it is in the U.S., but over spaetzle or mashed potatoes which we were told is common in Russia. Early bird coffee was available from 6:00-7:00AM and also throughout the day at the coffee station on the main deck. Lunch was served at either noon or 1:00PM depending on the tour schedule, with dinner at 7:00PM.

Onboard Activities: There was never a shortage of things to do onboard, but all were voluntary so you could participate in as few or as many as you wished. They featured the usual port talks, introduction to the Russian language, lectures on Russian handicrafts, vodka tastings, blini parties, pelmeni (dumpling) cooking class, and hand painting of Russian Matryoshka (nesting) dolls. We also noted several spontaneous bridge, cribbage, and canasta card games in progress at various times.

There is a large, well stocked gift store on the ship, operated as a separate concession. My wife found the prices for souvenirs of all types were generally better than souvenir shops ashore. They accept major credit cards or roubles. You cannot charge items from the store to your shipboard account.

Tours: There were a limited number of optional (extra cost) tours available. In St. Petersburg, that included:

Rivers & Canals of St. Petersburg

Yusopov Palace

St. Petersburg Ballet

Peterhof Gardens

In Petrozavodosk: Karelian Folk Show

Zlatoust Singers

Jewish Heritage of Moscow

Tretyakov Gallery

You can view the details of these optional tours on the GCT website: http://www.gct.com

under the Russian river cruise itinerary.

All passengers are provided with a pair of head phones & a battery powered receiver to provide the ability to listen to the tour guide while still wandering about the particular venue. The system works perfectly and depending upon location & interference such as walls, floors, and the like is crystal clear up to 100 feet from the tour guide. I have used these systems on other tours and would never consider a tour/cruise that did not employ this technology.

We took the Rivers & Canals of St. Petersburg tour which entailed taking a canal boat up & down the various rivers & canals running through St. Petersburg. It lasted approximately 90 minutes with a well informed local guide who commented on what we were seeing. It was interesting and informative and gives you another whole perspective on St. Petersburg than from a city bus tour.

We also went on the Peterhof gardens tour which unfortunately, did not go as well. The morning tour for that day was Peter & Paul Fortress which was really not that interesting and turned out to be just another church tour. However, because of the distance from where the boat moored to the fortress, then into St. Petersburg for lunch, the morning and part of the afternoon was pretty well shot by the time we departed for Peterhof. Peterhof is a good 45 minute drive from St. Petersburg; so consequently, it was well after 2:00PM when we arrived at the gardens. I’d like to say the local guide tried to cram what could easily have been a 4 hour tour into something less than two hours. So, we consequently were trying to set land speed records for walking tours as she was determined to show us as many of the Peterhof fountains as possible, and there are more than a few. My wife is a bit slow of foot as she has limited walking capacity so she was hard pressed to keep up. I, on the other hand, wanted more time to take pictures of the fountains and didn’t appreciate being rushed from spot to spot. Fortunately, our tour director Alex was particularly solicitous of my wife and made sure we could cut some corners and get ahead of the tour where necessary. Unfortunately, the local tour guide was annoyed when told to slow down and became somewhat hostile. The tour ends at the Peterhof palace which has a very large number of very beautiful fountains, all in gold leaf and is a photographer’s dream. It easily could have been worth an hour or more of picture taking opportunities. While I do understand some folks just want to check the block of having seen it and move on, there are, I think, a larger number of us who don’t expect to see those things again and want to take full advantage of the picture taking opportunities.

St. Petersburg: We spent 4 days in St. Petersburg not counting the day of arrival. The 1st full day, we had a city bus tour which included a stop & tour of St. Isaac’s Cathedral, and an approximately two hour visit to the famed Hermitage Art Museum with an option to stay for an additional 90 minutes, On Day 2, we had Catherine’s Palace & Park Tour, an offsite lunch paid for by GCT followed by the optional Rivers & Canals Tour, Day 4 was the Peter & Paul Fortress, again followed by lunch (this time on your own) followed by the optional Peterhof Gardens tour. On Day 3 of the visit, there were optional tours available of Yusopov Palace and the St. Petersburg ballet (evening). The boat was moored about 1 hour from downtown, depending on traffic, as the city authorities do not allow the riverboats to moor downtown. This caused some angst among those taking their 1st river cruise as they assumed this was standard. Of course, it’s not, and in fact, almost all European river cruises including Paris moor almost in the heart of the city. However, for those with free time and a little bit of adventurism, the subway took you downtown in less than 40 minutes. There is a bus from the head of the pier which costs 30 roubles (in early June 2012, roubles were 32.5 to 1 USD). That dropped you at the nearest metro entrance where 25 roubles and 5 stops later, landed you in the heart of Nevsky Prospekt, St. Petersburg’s equivalent to Times Square in NY or Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The metro is clean, no graffiti in the stations or on the cars, efficiently run and very safe. To return to the ship, just reverse the process. Once downtown, there are many attractions within easy walking distance such as the statue of the Bronze Horseman, a tribute from Catherine the Great to Peter the Great and the Church of our Savior on the Spilled Blood on which site, Tsar Alexander II was murdered by an assassin on 1 March 1881.

This was our 2nd time in St. Petersburg as we were there on an ocean cruise of the Baltics in 2003 when the city celebrated its 300th anniversary. It is to my mind, much more European than Russian with the latest fashions on display, many, many outdoor restaurant cafes and a mostly young, apparently well off population (at least during a business day).

We had previously been to Catherine’s Palace and the Hermitage and enjoyed returning to both places. St. Isaac’s is very impressive, but unfortunately, it is crowded and pickpockets are afoot. Several men & at least 1 woman had wallets stolen in the crowds so for them, not so much fun. Peter and Paul Fortress from a historical perspective is important, but rather unimpressive.

We visited St. Petersburg during the period of the summer referred to as “White Nights” which are quite famous. Sunrise occurs about 4:30AM and sunset at 11:15PM. Since winters are long, cold, and sometimes very harsh, the many hours of sunlight are greatly appreciated and folks go out to stroll, especially on Nevsky Prospekt well into the evening hours enjoying the many parks and recreation areas throughout the city.

Svir Stroi: This is a small village of about 600 people located on the Svir River. They have the requisite souvenir shops, but the highlight of the stop was the visit to the home of a Russian villager. Our opportunity came to visit the wife of a local employee of the hydro electric plant. We visited her home and were served tea & pirozhki’s (Russian tea cakes). With the able help of our tour director, Tanya who translated, the lady explained her daily life in the village and the challenges ordinary people now face compared to the days of the Soviet Union. This is also where we first encountered the fierce Russian mosquitoes or as the tour directors called them, the KGB mosquitoes. They’re big, they bite and they fly around over the 3 months of summer. Mosquito repellent does, however, work when liberally applied.

Petrozavodsk: This port city on Lake Onega which is the second largest lake in Europe, only surpassed by Lake Ladoga, included a bus tour as well as a visit to the memorial to Russian’s Unknown Soldier from World War II, and a tour of the local market. It is the industrial, cultural, and scientific center of the Republic of Karelia. The visit also included an optional tour to a Karelian folk show which we opted not to attend.

Kizhi (Kee-shee) Island: This small island in the center of Lake Onega is home to the oldest known wooden church in Russia, the Church of Transfiguration which features 22 timbered onion shaped domes. The church was assembled without the use of a single metal nail and is currently undergoing extensive renovation. The stop also featured a “Fishing with the Ship’s Captain & Staff” for those who are ardent anglers. Fishing apparently wasn’t so successful as we did not have fish on the menu that evening!

Goritzy/Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery: Goritsky is just another tiny town, but the monastery was built in 1397 and had close connections with Ivan the Terrible. At one time, over 200 monks lived in the monastery, but with the Russian revolution and the harsh suppression of religion in Russia, it deteriorated significantly and now houses only 6 monks. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, restoration efforts have begun and the museum features an impressive collection of Russian Orthodox icons.

Uglich: The last city we visited prior to Moscow is located on the Volga River. Cruising on the river as you come onto Uglich is very impressive. The Kremlin (or fortress) has no exterior walls so the many colored churches and domes make great picture opportunities. The very large Cathedral of Transfiguration looms over the town while the Church of St. Dmitry on the Blood with its rich red walls and blue onion domes offer a sharp contrast. Souvenir and shops selling all sorts of goods line the route from the ship’s berth to the main street of Uglich. We were told by the local guide that as many as 7 to 8 river cruise ships a day visit Uglich during the summer. They also were having a display of lacquer and paper Mache’ boxes for sale at very Western prices. Enameled watches are also a specialty of Uglich. We were treated to a short concert by a group of male classically trained singers who rendered several Russian songs a capella during our visit.

Moscow: We arrived in Moscow about 3 hours late because of heavy fog the previous evening while transiting the Moscow Canal. The river authorities do not allow movement in the canal during heavy fog, so we waited out the down time in one of the locks. The ship moored a good ways from downtown as the city authorities do not allow river cruise ships downtown, the same rule as St. Petersburg. Moscow is a city of 11.5 million people and traffic can be a nightmare. However, we were fortunate to arrive on a Monday before a national holiday (Day of Russia) on Tuesday and Moscovites are like people everywhere; they angle to take the day before a big holiday off. So, the traffic to downtown was pretty light and we made up some time on the city tour which started in the famous Red Square outside the Kremlin walls. The tour included a walk around Saint Basil’s Cathedral which is actually a museum, then on to the GUM department store which resembles a U.S. mall. We also walked past a “Historic Toilet” located in Gum’s that I believe was the 1st indoor lavatory in a Moscow department store. (Use of the WC was 84 roubles for those interested; I took a pass). We also went for a ride on the famed Moscow metro where many of the stations are elaborately decorated in frescoes, busts representing the struggle of the common man, and other adornments of the Russian revolution. As in St. Petersburg, the metro is clean (no graffiti in the stations or on the cars) and very safe.

The next day was the national holiday so our tours steered us quite far from Red Square (where demonstrations were purported to occur against the Presidential election recently completed) and out to Sparrow Hills which is a high priced area of the city. We also toured the New Maiden cemetery where various Russian notables such as Boris Yeltsin and Nikita Khrushchev are buried. The evening tour involved a visit to the Moscow circus which has been in continuous operation since 1980. A fun time of clowns, jugglers, trained poodles, bears, a lion taming act and culminated with a trapeze performance by 5 daring men & 1 woman.

The following day was a tour inside the Kremlin walls and to one of the 5 churches located inside the walls. I found it ironic that 5 churches would be allowed to exist following the revolution, but many things in Russia are strange, this only being one example. We also toured the Kremlin armory which contains the Tsar’s Crown Jewels, armor and armaments of the 16th- 18th century, many Tsarina coronation and wedding dresses as well as a very extensive display of Faberge eggs. The tour concluded with lunch at Moscow’s Hard Rock Café and time to tour Arbat Street which is a pedestrian only street in the heart of Moscow.

We had family obligations that required us to cut the last full day off the cruise and return home via direct flight from Moscow to Dulles International.

Final Observations: It was a very interesting and different river cruise for us. Because the distances are so vast, there is a lot more down time on this cruise than one in European waters, but Grand Circle can make it as busy or as relaxed as you like. The meals were comparable to those served on our other river cruises for quantity and quality. There are slightly more optional tours than with some other companies, but on the other hand, some of the included tours were excellent. St. Petersburg is a great city and one I’d be pleased to visit again; Moscow, not so much. Grand Circle is certainly worth your consideration as a cruise line as the prices are competitive with all other Russian river cruises. We did book our air through Grand Circle which I’m normally reluctant to do, but the routing was the same that I would have chosen had I done my own booking and the pricing was better than I could do on my own, especially considering what GCT would have charged for transfers to and from the ship. We did not purchase travel insurance through GCT as I found we could do better by shopping around over the Internet.

Link to comment

Share on other sites, beverlyjack.

We did this trip in 2004, aboard the chartered Nicholay Chernychevski, before Grand Circle had put the Tikhi Don into service. This was an excellent review and brings back memories. Please post it under Travelers Reviews on http://www.gct.com on this trip.

Thank you for the informative review. I am taking this tour in mid August. I will print what you wrote so that I can refer to it as I do some of my planning.

How many people were in your "group" ? Did you take the pretrip to Helsinki and Tallinn?

We had about 32 people in our group. I don't know what, if any criteria, other than numbers were used to make up the groups. We did not take any pre or post trips with this cruise.

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

• Welcome to Cruise Critic
• New Cruisers
• Cruise Lines “A – O”
• Cruise Lines “P – Z”
• Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
• Special Interest Cruising
• Cruise Discussion Topics
• UK Cruising
• Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
• Canadian Cruisers
• North American Homeports
• Ports of Call
• Cruise Conversations

Announcements

• New to Cruise Critic? Join our Community!

Write Your Own Amazing Review !

Click this gorgeous photo by member SUPERstar777 to share your review!

Features & News

LauraS · Started Friday at 06:20 PM

LauraS · Started Thursday at 07:00 PM

LauraS · Started Wednesday at 05:35 PM

LauraS · Started Wednesday at 11:50 AM

LauraS · Started Tuesday at 02:48 PM

• Existing user? Sign in OR Create an Account
• Find Your Roll Call
• Meet & Mingle
• Community Help Center
• All Activity
• Member Photo Albums
• Meet & Mingle Photos
• Favorite Cruise Memories
• Cruise Food Photos
• Cruise Ship Photos
• Ports of Call Photos
• Towel Animal Photos
• Amazing, Funny & Totally Awesome Cruise Photos
• Write a Review
• Live Cruise Reports
• Member Cruise Reviews
• Create New...